agentleFS
slowdinislowdini/slow-powers/AGENTS.md

slow-powers

AGENTS.md2 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub

Slow-powers is a set of software development methodology skills and meta skill-writing guidance. This repo ships Slow-powers across four harnesses: - skills/ — Skills, assets, and cross-cutting tests - .claude-plugin/ — Claude Code plugin - .codex-plugin/ — OpenAI Codex plugin - opencode/ — OpenCode plugin (@slowdini/slow-powers-opencode) - cline/ — Cline plugin (CLI/SDK/Kanban only; declared via the cline field in package.json, with skills/ auto-discovered from the package root) Cline-specific setup for working on this repo also lives at root: - .clinerules/…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    All skills MUST use cross-harness vocabulary, as described in slow-powers/writing-skills.

    line 39
  2. Distinctive:

    Read existing skills before proposing changes to skill content.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    Test your change on at least one harness and note which one in the PR description.

    line 47
  4. Distinctive:

    If you modify skill content:

    line 53
  5. Very specific:

    Use slow-powers:writing-skills to develop and test changes.

    line 55
  6. Distinctive:

    Run adversarial pressure testing across multiple sessions, not just the happy path.

    line 58
  7. Distinctive:

    Ensure skills are cross-harness compatible: avoid harness-specific tool or feature names.

    line 65

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Slow-powers

Slow-powers is a set of software development methodology skills and meta skill-writing guidance.

What lives here

This repo ships Slow-powers across four harnesses:

  • skills/ — Skills, assets, and cross-cutting tests
  • .claude-plugin/ — Claude Code plugin
  • .codex-plugin/ — OpenAI Codex plugin
  • opencode/ — OpenCode plugin (@slowdini/slow-powers-opencode)
  • cline/ — Cline plugin (CLI/SDK/Kanban only; declared via the cline field in package.json, with skills/ auto-discovered from the package root)

Cline-specific setup for working on this repo also lives at root:

  • .clinerules/ — Cline rules (the Memory Bank custom instructions), tracked
  • memory-bank/ — Cline Memory Bank contents. Gitignored: each developer keeps their own local bank; only the rule in .clinerules/ is shared

Editing the right files

Two file-confusion traps are common in this repo. Avoid both:

  • Write memory-file changes to AGENTS.md, the only real file. CLAUDE.md (and any future harness-specific memory files) are symlinks to AGENTS.md. Edit AGENTS.md directly; the symlinks reflect it automatically. Never try to "fix up" the other names — there's nothing to fix.
  • Read and edit only files inside this repository, never the installed slow-powers plugin. Your environment almost always has the slow-powers plugin installed while this repo is the bleeding-edge dev source. The two trees diverge, so an installed skill file is not the file you want. Every read and edit belongs to a path under this project directory.

Cross-Harness Compatibility

All skills MUST use cross-harness vocabulary, as described in slow-powers/writing-skills.

Pull Request Requirements

  • Read existing skills before proposing changes to skill content. Skill prose has been tuned over many iterations upstream and downstream; changes to behavior-shaping content (Red Flags tables, rationalization lists, "human partner" language) need evidence the change is an improvement.
  • Test your change on at least one harness and note which one in the PR description. If your change touches harness-specific infrastructure, test that harness.

Skill Changes

If you modify skill content:

  • Use slow-powers:writing-skills to develop and test changes.
  • Define coverage against the skill's intended goals. Reuse the suite for prose revisions; change cases for changed goals, uncovered failures, or defective grading.
  • Run adversarial pressure testing across multiple sessions, not just the happy path.
  • For behavior-shaping changes, show before/after eval results in the PR description. For deterministic changes (instruction-following the agent reliably does anyway), state the decision and reasoning to skip the eval instead — see "When to run" in slow-powers:evaluating-skills. Label exploratory evidence and unfinished measurement explicitly.
  • Ensure skills are cross-harness compatible: avoid harness-specific tool or feature names.
  • Our discipline-enforcing skills should carry at least one seeded eval case — one that embeds a short prior transcript so the skill is met mid-session under a competing attractor — because their real-world failures happen in-flight and a cold prompt alone under-measures them. Keep a cold contrast and see "Seeding conversation context" in the pressure-scenarios reference.

Local development

bun install   # also activates git hooks via the `prepare` script
bun test
bun run check

bun install runs the prepare script, which installs the git hooks (pre-commit runs typecheck + lint-staged; pre-push runs the test suite).

bun scripts/bump-version.ts <version> updates every manifest in lockstep.

To test the Cline integration live: cline plugin install ./ --cwd <scratch-dir>, run a Cline session in the scratch dir, then cline plugin uninstall slow-powers --cwd <scratch-dir> when done.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.