workflow-vault-weekly
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run the full weekly vault-health pipeline — vault-lint (consistency check) → backlinks (graph repair) → vault-index (rebuild overview) → weekly-signals (deferral / pattern surface) → weekly-learnings (publishable thread surface). Use when /weekly-review is invoked, on Friday afternoons, when the user says "weekly vault review", "audit my vault", "what should I publish this week", or after a week of heavy capture activity. Skips stages whose preconditions aren't met (e.g. weekly-learnings needs ≥3 daily notes from the week).
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- adversarial-diff-verifySkill
- agent-harnessSkill
- agents-md-generatorSkill
- plugin-manifest-referenceSkill
- publish-postSkill
- research-sweepSkill
- workflow-designSkill
- workflow-feature-specSkill
- workflow-monthly-skill-auditSkill
- workflow-stage-draftSkill
- work-trackingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
After a week of heavy note capture, before reviewing for patterns.
- Very specific: line 67
Default: run lint → backlinks → index → signals → learnings in order, with checkpoints between each (except index, which auto-continues).
- Very specific: line 71
If <step> is not in {lint, backlinks, index, signals, learnings}, print:
- Very specific: line 104
If a stage errors, stop and print: which step failed, the underlying skill's error, and the resume command (/workflow-vault-weekly …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: /workflow-vault-weekly
Runs the five vault-health skills in dependency order so the later stages have current data from the earlier ones. Use weekly.
When to use
- Friday-afternoon vault review.
- After a week of heavy note capture, before reviewing for patterns.
- The user explicitly says "weekly vault review" / "what should I publish this week".
When NOT to use
- Daily; the daily rituals (
/morning,/eod,/log) cover the within-day cadence. - For specific known issues (one orphan note, one stale tag) — call the targeted skill directly.
Steps
| Step name | Stage | Invokes |
lint | Lint | vault-lint |
backlinks | Backlinks | backlinks |
index | Vault index | vault-index |
signals | Weekly signals | weekly-signals |
learnings | Weekly learnings | weekly-learnings |
Stage 1: Lint — step lint — invokes vault-lint
Scans Concepts/, finds orphans, broken links, missing pages, contradictions. Writes vault-lint-report.md.
Output: report file exists. Checkpoint: surface any blocking issues before continuing.
Stage 2: Backlinks — step backlinks — invokes backlinks
Audits and repairs the backlink graph; flags structurally important orphans.
Output: backlink-audit summary in conversation. Checkpoint: confirm fixes applied before rebuilding the index.
Stage 3: Vault index — step index — invokes vault-index
Rebuilds the vault-index note from current state.
Output: vault-index.md updated.
Checkpoint: skip checkpoint by default — auto-continue.
Stage 4: Weekly signals — step signals — invokes weekly-signals
Reads patterns.md + the week's daily notes; surfaces deferral patterns and flagged items.
Output: weekly-signals output (in conversation; can be saved if user asks). Checkpoint: confirm signal review before surfacing publishable threads.
Stage 5: Weekly learnings — step learnings — invokes weekly-learnings
Looks for publishable threads from the week's signals + vault deltas.
Output: list of 1–3 candidate threads.
Resume protocol
Default: run lint → backlinks → index → signals → learnings in order, with checkpoints between each (except index, which auto-continues).
--resume-from <step>: skip every step before <step> and begin from <step>. The named step itself runs.
If <step> is not in {lint, backlinks, index, signals, learnings}, print:
Invalid resume-from step: <step>
Valid steps: lint, backlinks, index, signals, learnings…and stop.
Required state when resuming
The vault stages mostly read from the live vault, so missing prior outputs are usually fine — but a few steps depend on prior reports.
--resume-from lint— same as a fresh run.--resume-from backlinks— runs against the live vault. Ifvault-lint-report.mdis absent, warn the user thatlintwould normally have surfaced issues first; ask whether to continue.--resume-from index— runs against the live vault. No required prior state.--resume-from signals— needspatterns.mdand at least the current week's daily notes. Ifpatterns.mdis missing, surface the gap and stop.--resume-from learnings— works best with the previous step's signals output. If signals weren't run this week, ask the user to paste the signals output or confirm we should derive learnings without them.
Examples:
/workflow-vault-weekly --resume-from signals --no-pause # cron-style mid-week signal pull
/workflow-vault-weekly --resume-from learnings # signals already reviewed manuallyOther flags
--skip <step>to skip a step (e.g.--skip learningsto stop after signals).--no-pauseto run end-to-end (use this for the cron-driven weekly run).
Stage quality gate
After each stage: does the output actually address the stage goal (lint = issues enumerated; backlinks = graph repaired; index = current; signals = patterns surfaced; learnings = candidate threads identified)? If it partially misses, retry the stage once with an explicit note on the gap. On second failure, surface to the user and move on rather than blocking the rest of the pipeline.
Failure handling
If a stage errors, stop and print: which step failed, the underlying skill's error, and the resume command (/workflow-vault-weekly --resume-from <step>).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

