note
Skill1 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Quick capture — instantly create a SlashNote with auto-detected type
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- WALKERKILLER/Look-Tongji-Notestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- egregore-labs/egregoretheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- buildomator/buildomatortheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- lza6/claw-code-tingfengtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Srltas/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- chris-peterson/tacktheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use add, update and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
tim-mccrimmonSkilladd
Process a document (PRD, architecture doc, security requirements, etc.) into structured context. Extracts relevant information and generates appropriate SCDs.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillupdate
Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity. Use when pulling new assignments from your project tracker into TASKS.md, triaging stale or overdue tasks, filling memory gaps for unknown people or projects, or running a comprehensive scan to catch todos buried in chat and email.
Also in 4 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillresume
Resume a thread by loading its ~800-token context capsule
Also in 3 projects that use this
BlockSkillplan
Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
- buildomator/buildomator★ 102same name
- yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit★ 54same name
- WALKERKILLER/Look-Tongji-Notes★ 53same name
- owenliang60-ship-it/knowledge-mgmt★ 37same name
- microsoft/DocAtlas-Harness★ 21same name
- maxwellsdm1867/wheeler★ 12same name
- flowing-abyss/obsidian-vault-skills★ 9same name
- lza6/claw-code-tingfeng★ 5same name
- tansuasici/claude-research-kit★ 4same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- note-bugSkill
- note-contextSkill
- note-decideSkill
- note-findSkill
- note-loopSkill
- note-meetingSkill
- note-snippetSkill
- note-standupSkill
- note-todoSkill
- note-wrapupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Create a SlashNote sticky note instantly from the user's input.
- Very specific: line 77
Format: If input is URL-only → # Bookmark heading + URL as body.
- Distinctive: line 81
When no category reaches 2 points, or input is short (< 5 words):
- Very specific: line 89
Add as # <Title> heading
- Distinctive: line 96
If multiple categories score equally:
- Distinctive: line 98
If still ambiguous, default to yellow plain text
- Very specific: line 106
Call mcp__slashnote__create_note with detected color and formatted content
- Distinctive: line 125
Scoring: No category reaches 2 → Yellow plain text
- Distinctive: line 147
Keep it fast — one tool call, no extra questions
- Distinctive: line 148
Do NOT ask the user for confirmation, color choice, or anything else
- Distinctive: line 151
When in doubt, prefer yellow plain text over a wrong category
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/note — Quick Capture
Create a SlashNote sticky note instantly from the user's input. Zero friction — one command, one tool call, done.
Usage
/note <text>Auto-Detection Rules
Analyze the user's input using a confidence scoring system. Each signal adds weight — the category with the highest score wins. Minimum 2 points to activate a category; otherwise default to plain note.
Checklist (peach) — score 2+ to activate
| Signal | Points |
Contains - or * list items (2+ items) | 3 |
| Contains comma-separated items (3+ items, no verbs/sentences) | 2 |
| Contains TODO/task keywords: "todo", "task", "checklist", "list" | 2 |
| Contains action verbs at start of items: "buy", "review", "deploy", "send", "check", "update" | 1 |
Format: Convert each item to - [ ] Item. If comma-separated, split by commas. No heading needed.
Bug (pink) — score 2+ to activate
| Signal | Points |
| Explicit bug words: "bug", "crash", "broken", "regression" | 3 |
| Error context: "error", "exception", "fails", "not working", "undefined" | 2 |
| Word "fix" combined with another bug signal | 1 |
| Word "fix" alone (without other signals) | 0 |
| Word "issue" with technical context | 1 |
Format: # Bug: <concise title (max 8 words)> then body text. The word "fix" alone does NOT trigger bug — it's too common in normal usage.
Idea (blue) — score 2+ to activate
| Signal | Points |
| Speculative words: "maybe", "what if", "could we", "how about" | 3 |
| Exploration words: "consider", "explore", "experiment", "try" | 2 |
| Word "idea" or "concept" | 3 |
| Question format about approach/design | 1 |
Format: # Idea heading + the text as body.
Code (purple) — score 2+ to activate
| Signal | Points |
| Contains triple backticks | 3 |
Contains code keywords: func , def , class , import , const , let , var at word boundary | 2 |
Contains code operators: ->, =>, ::, |> | 2 |
Contains file path patterns: src/, .swift, .ts, .py, .rs | 1 |
Format: Wrap in code block with detected language. Add # Snippet heading if content is multi-line.
Link (yellow + bookmark) — score 2+ to activate
| Signal | Points |
Contains URL pattern: http://, https://, www. | 3 |
Contains domain pattern: *.com, *.io, *.dev, *.org | 2 |
| Contains "link", "url", "site", "page", "article" keywords | 1 |
Format: If input is URL-only → # Bookmark heading + URL as body. If URL + description → description as title + URL below. Color stays yellow but content is formatted.
Default (yellow) — fallback
When no category reaches 2 points, or input is short (< 5 words):
- Plain text, no heading, no formatting
- Color: yellow
Auto-Title
For notes longer than 20 words that don't get a heading from category detection:
- Generate a concise title (max 6 words) from the content
- Add as
# <Title>heading - This makes notes scannable in the list view
Short notes (< 20 words) → no auto-title needed.
Tie-Breaking
If multiple categories score equally:
- Checklist > Bug > Idea > Code > Link (priority order)
- If still ambiguous, default to yellow plain text
Behavior
- Parse the user's input after
/note - Score each category using signals above
- Pick the highest-scoring category (minimum 2 points)
- Apply auto-title if needed (long notes without heading)
- Call
mcp__slashnote__create_notewith detected color and formatted content - Confirm to the user: "Created [color] note: [first line preview]"
Examples
Input: /note Fix race condition in WebSocket handler
Scoring: Bug gets 0 ("fix" alone = 0 points) → Yellow plain text
Input: /note Bug: race condition crashes WebSocket handler
Scoring: Bug gets 6 → Pink bug note
Result: # Bug: Race condition crashes WebSocket handler
Input: /note - Buy milk - Review PR - Deploy staging
Scoring: Checklist gets 4 → Peach checklist with 3 checkboxes
Input: /note buy milk, review PR, deploy staging, send email
Scoring: Checklist gets 3 → Peach checklist with 4 checkboxes
Input: /note Use LRU cache for API responses
Scoring: No category reaches 2 → Yellow plain text
Input: /note Maybe we should try SSE instead of WebSockets
Scoring: Idea gets 5 → Blue idea with # Idea heading
Input: /note func validate(token: String) -> Bool
Scoring: Code gets 4 → Purple Swift code block
Input: /note https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code
Scoring: Link gets 3 → Yellow bookmark
Result: # Bookmark heading + URL
Input: /note Great article about SwiftUI performance https://swiftui-lab.com/performance
Scoring: Link gets 3 → Yellow with description as title
Result: # SwiftUI Performance Article heading + URL below
Input: /note We discussed the migration strategy with the team today. The consensus was to use a phased approach starting with the auth module, then moving to the API layer, and finally the UI components. Timeline is 3 sprints.
Auto-title applied (>20 words, no category) → Yellow with generated title
Result: # Migration Strategy — Phased Approach heading + full text
Important
- Keep it fast — one tool call, no extra questions
- Do NOT ask the user for confirmation, color choice, or anything else
- Confidence scoring happens in your head — do not show scores to the user
- Short inputs (< 5 words) → always yellow plain text (skip scoring)
- When in doubt, prefer yellow plain text over a wrong category
- Zero friction is the #1 goal — never add steps between input and note creation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

