agentleFS
slashnote-appslashnote-app/claude-code-plugin/skills/note/SKILL.md

note

Skill1 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Quick capture — instantly create a SlashNote with auto-detected type

23 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use add, update and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • tim-mccrimmonSkill

    add

    Process a document (PRD, architecture doc, security requirements, etc.) into structured context. Extracts relevant information and generates appropriate SCDs.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    update

    Sync tasks and refresh memory from your current activity. Use when pulling new assignments from your project tracker into TASKS.md, triaging stale or overdue tasks, filling memory gaps for unknown people or projects, or running a comprehensive scan to catch todos buried in chat and email.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • genomewalkerSkill

    resume

    Resume a thread by loading its ~800-token context capsule

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    tdd

    Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create a SlashNote sticky note instantly from the user's input.

    line 12
  2. Very specific:

    Format: If input is URL-only → # Bookmark heading + URL as body.

    line 77
  3. Distinctive:

    When no category reaches 2 points, or input is short (< 5 words):

    line 81
  4. Very specific:

    Add as # <Title> heading

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    If multiple categories score equally:

    line 96
  6. Distinctive:

    If still ambiguous, default to yellow plain text

    line 98
  7. Very specific:

    Call mcp__slashnote__create_note with detected color and formatted content

    line 106
  8. Distinctive:

    Scoring: No category reaches 2 → Yellow plain text

    line 125
  9. Distinctive:

    Keep it fast — one tool call, no extra questions

    line 147
  10. Distinctive:

    Do NOT ask the user for confirmation, color choice, or anything else

    line 148
  11. Distinctive:

    When in doubt, prefer yellow plain text over a wrong category

    line 151

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/note — Quick Capture

Create a SlashNote sticky note instantly from the user's input. Zero friction — one command, one tool call, done.

Usage

/note <text>

Auto-Detection Rules

Analyze the user's input using a confidence scoring system. Each signal adds weight — the category with the highest score wins. Minimum 2 points to activate a category; otherwise default to plain note.

Checklist (peach) — score 2+ to activate

SignalPoints
Contains - or * list items (2+ items)3
Contains comma-separated items (3+ items, no verbs/sentences)2
Contains TODO/task keywords: "todo", "task", "checklist", "list"2
Contains action verbs at start of items: "buy", "review", "deploy", "send", "check", "update"1

Format: Convert each item to - [ ] Item. If comma-separated, split by commas. No heading needed.

Bug (pink) — score 2+ to activate

SignalPoints
Explicit bug words: "bug", "crash", "broken", "regression"3
Error context: "error", "exception", "fails", "not working", "undefined"2
Word "fix" combined with another bug signal1
Word "fix" alone (without other signals)0
Word "issue" with technical context1

Format: # Bug: <concise title (max 8 words)> then body text. The word "fix" alone does NOT trigger bug — it's too common in normal usage.

Idea (blue) — score 2+ to activate

SignalPoints
Speculative words: "maybe", "what if", "could we", "how about"3
Exploration words: "consider", "explore", "experiment", "try"2
Word "idea" or "concept"3
Question format about approach/design1

Format: # Idea heading + the text as body.

Code (purple) — score 2+ to activate

SignalPoints
Contains triple backticks3
Contains code keywords: func , def , class , import , const , let , var at word boundary2
Contains code operators: ->, =>, ::, |>2
Contains file path patterns: src/, .swift, .ts, .py, .rs1

Format: Wrap in code block with detected language. Add # Snippet heading if content is multi-line.

Link (yellow + bookmark) — score 2+ to activate

SignalPoints
Contains URL pattern: http://, https://, www.3
Contains domain pattern: *.com, *.io, *.dev, *.org2
Contains "link", "url", "site", "page", "article" keywords1

Format: If input is URL-only → # Bookmark heading + URL as body. If URL + description → description as title + URL below. Color stays yellow but content is formatted.

Default (yellow) — fallback

When no category reaches 2 points, or input is short (< 5 words):

  • Plain text, no heading, no formatting
  • Color: yellow

Auto-Title

For notes longer than 20 words that don't get a heading from category detection:

  • Generate a concise title (max 6 words) from the content
  • Add as # <Title> heading
  • This makes notes scannable in the list view

Short notes (< 20 words) → no auto-title needed.

Tie-Breaking

If multiple categories score equally:

  1. Checklist > Bug > Idea > Code > Link (priority order)
  2. If still ambiguous, default to yellow plain text

Behavior

  1. Parse the user's input after /note
  2. Score each category using signals above
  3. Pick the highest-scoring category (minimum 2 points)
  4. Apply auto-title if needed (long notes without heading)
  5. Call mcp__slashnote__create_note with detected color and formatted content
  6. Confirm to the user: "Created [color] note: [first line preview]"

Examples

Input: /note Fix race condition in WebSocket handler Scoring: Bug gets 0 ("fix" alone = 0 points) → Yellow plain text

Input: /note Bug: race condition crashes WebSocket handler Scoring: Bug gets 6 → Pink bug note Result: # Bug: Race condition crashes WebSocket handler

Input: /note - Buy milk - Review PR - Deploy staging Scoring: Checklist gets 4 → Peach checklist with 3 checkboxes

Input: /note buy milk, review PR, deploy staging, send email Scoring: Checklist gets 3 → Peach checklist with 4 checkboxes

Input: /note Use LRU cache for API responses Scoring: No category reaches 2 → Yellow plain text

Input: /note Maybe we should try SSE instead of WebSockets Scoring: Idea gets 5 → Blue idea with # Idea heading

Input: /note func validate(token: String) -> Bool Scoring: Code gets 4 → Purple Swift code block

Input: /note https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code Scoring: Link gets 3 → Yellow bookmark Result: # Bookmark heading + URL

Input: /note Great article about SwiftUI performance https://swiftui-lab.com/performance Scoring: Link gets 3 → Yellow with description as title Result: # SwiftUI Performance Article heading + URL below

Input: /note We discussed the migration strategy with the team today. The consensus was to use a phased approach starting with the auth module, then moving to the API layer, and finally the UI components. Timeline is 3 sprints. Auto-title applied (>20 words, no category) → Yellow with generated title Result: # Migration Strategy — Phased Approach heading + full text

Important

  • Keep it fast — one tool call, no extra questions
  • Do NOT ask the user for confirmation, color choice, or anything else
  • Confidence scoring happens in your head — do not show scores to the user
  • Short inputs (< 5 words) → always yellow plain text (skip scoring)
  • When in doubt, prefer yellow plain text over a wrong category
  • Zero friction is the #1 goal — never add steps between input and note creation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.