Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
Skill: Codereview for TheAlgorithms/Python
Review a pull request against the rules already written in
[`CONTRIBUTING.md`](../../../CONTRIBUTING.md). The goal is a review that any
reviewer (human
Review code changes for correctness, regressions, and unintended scope. Use when reviewing a pull request, branch, commit, patch, or local diff, including when invoked with /code-review.
Perform a code review of the current session's changes. Use when the user requests a code review via the Run Code Review button in the Changes toolbar.
Reviews Spec Kit code changes for consistency with applicable design documents, positive and negative test coverage, regression evidence for bug fixes, and consistent repository terminology. Use when reviewing a diff or pull request. Do not use for implementing changes or posting GitHub review actions.
Review llama.cpp changes against project conventions and common reviewer pitfalls before a PR. Use when the user wants to review a diff, branch, or PR.
Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis. Use when user asks to review code, check for bugs, or audit a codebase.
Code review flow — review a diff, PR, or code change, delegating the review to a subagent that follows the code-review-criteria skill. Use it when the user asks to review code or a PR, in any phrasing.
Steady4 mentions in 2 weeks
61 projects use a version of this
62k51d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review changed code against project standards. Checks for missing tests, dead code, type safety, lint issues, and coding conventions. Run after completing any implementation work.
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
Review a pnpm diff or pull request against the repository review guide and product conventions, verify findings, and report actionable issues. Use for code reviews and reviewing your own changes before or during a PR workflow.
61 projects use a version of this
37k5d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
Rigorous review of OWASP Cheat Sheet Series pull requests across security correctness, practicality, link and source verification, duplication, and language. Use for any pull request that touches cheatsheets/ or cheatsheets_draft/, or that adds or changes external links or citations.
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.
mattpocockSkill
