Hunt architectural, lifecycle, and state-confusion security bugs in Rabby that diff-scoped review misses — consent surviving session boundaries, cross-context message confusion, fail-open guards, and unsafe state across restarts. Use for any security audit of the Rabby codebase, especially non-PR-scoped or release-time audits.
1.9k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Inspect, mark, or revoke vulnerable LobeHub Desktop versions through the existing release workflow and signed R2 security policy. Use for forced security updates across Stable, Canary, Beta, and Nightly.
86k1d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Run an AWS Security Agent threat model review on spec/design documents. Use when the user asks to review a spec for security, run a threat model, check if a design introduces security risks, review requirements.md or design.md for security posture changes, or STRIDE analysis.
Steady49 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
3.5k3d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Security audit checklist based on OWASP Top 10 and best practices. Covers authentication, injection, XSS, CSRF, secrets management, and more. Use when reviewing security, before deploy, asking "is this secure", "security check", "vulnerability".
Steady3 mentions in 2 weeks
4 projects use a version of this
1.2k54d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Find security vulnerabilities in a codebase or repository with Strix — a white-box AI security review that reads your source, reasons about the actual data flow and authorization model, then exploits what it finds in a live sandbox so every reported issue has a working proof-of-concept instead of a noisy static-analysis alert. Covers injection, XSS, SSRF, broken access control and IDOR, insecure deserialization, secrets in code, unsafe dependencies, and business-logic flaws. Use when the user asks to security-scan, security-review, or audit their code, repo, or pull request for vulnerabilities.
Steady5 mentions in 2 weeks
2 projects use a version of this
76k9mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Enforces GitHub Actions security and compliance for this monorepo. Use when adding third-party actions, handling secrets, defining permissions, and reviewing CI security trade-offs.
4.4k10d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.
Steady6 mentions in 2 weeks
2 projects use a version of this
14k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a change (a PR, the current branch diff, or a set of files) or audit a Symfony UX package or the whole `src/` tree for missing or incorrect security hardening. Reasons about trust boundaries from first principles, then checks the code against the hardening families catalogued from ux's past security fixes. Use when asked for a security review or a security audit of ux code, whether a change weakens a security control, or to hunt a vulnerability class across the packages.
1.1k9d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Comprehensive API security testing methodology covering REST, gRPC, and WebSocket attack surfaces. Addresses the full OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, excessive data exposure, rate limiting bypass, BFLA, mass assignment, SSRF, and security misconfiguration. Includes REST-specific attacks such as HTTP verb tampering, content-type switching, and parameter pollution. Covers gRPC exploitation through protobuf interception, reflection API enumeration, and metadata injection. Addresses WebSocket vulnerabilities including origin bypass, message injection, and cross-site WebSocket hijacking. Provides tooling guidance for Burp Suite, Postman, grpcurl, websocat, and mitmproxy. Each technique includes detection signatures and defensive indicators so you understand what artifacts your testing leaves behind. Designed for authorized penetration testing engagements against API-driven architectures.
2 projects use a version of this
11k52d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Linux security mechanism bypass playbook. Use when facing restricted bash/rbash, read-only or noexec filesystems, AppArmor, SELinux, seccomp filters, or audit logging that must be evaded during post-exploitation.
2.4k7mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
macOS security bypass playbook. Use when targeting macOS endpoints and need to bypass TCC, Gatekeeper, SIP, sandbox, code signing, or entitlement-based protections during authorized red team or pentest engagements.
2.4k7mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Draft a GitHub security advisory (GHSA) for nrwl/nx from a vulnerability report. Investigates the affected code, determines affected packages and version ranges, proposes a CVSS score and CWEs, and writes a draft advisory following the layout of previously published nrwl/nx advisories. Output is a local draft only — a human reviews and publishes. Use when a security vulnerability report needs to become an advisory, or when the user says "draft an advisory", "write a GHSA", or "security advisory for <report>".
29k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when reviewing authorized WeChat mini-program or mini-app targets for authentication bypass, IDOR, undefined-path access, API abuse, decryption and signature analysis, runtime reverse engineering, route mapping, and sensitive data exposure, with file-submission attack surfaces intentionally excluded.
2.2k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.
2 projects use a version of this
7.8k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Design, implement, test, and ship the actual code fix for a security advisory that has already been verified as real (typically by security-advisory-triage) against this repo. Use this whenever the user asks to fix, patch, remediate, harden, or "build a comprehensive fix for" a confirmed vulnerability or GHSA, or says something like "now let's fix it" right after a triage/verification step. Don't wait for the user to ask for "the process" by name; if a vulnerability is confirmed and they want it shipped, this skill is almost certainly what they want. Companion to security-advisory-triage, which verifies and writes up the advisory; this one builds and ships the fix.
1.7k14d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.