Substance-focused review of a PX4 pull request — merit, first-principles correctness, architecture fit. Produces a debrief for the user and a draft review comment.
185 projects use a version of this
13k34d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Load before reviewing any pull request, deciding a PR's fate, or drafting a PR verdict, close comment, or review comment — and inside batch triage as the per-PR engine.
13k6d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
QA review for code changes — test coverage analysis, edge case identification, test plan generation, regression detection, test health tracking over time.
13k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review Highcharts code and pull requests (PRs), branch diffs, staged diffs or selected files for correctness, performance, API consistency, accessibility, security, docs/doclets and tests using CODE_REVIEWS.md.
186 projects use a version of this
13k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Presidio pull request, or the current branch, against the repo's contribution rules and return a short verdict with what is missing. Use when asked to review, check, or approve a PR, or before opening one.
Steady24 mentions in 2 weeks
185 projects use a version of this
12k7d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Terraform AWS Provider pull request for correctness and conventions. Start here for any PR review: it holds the cross-cutting review principles and routes to scoped sub-skills (review-lifecycle, review-schema, review-helpers, review-identity, review-tags, review-generated, review-tests, review-tests-helpers, review-docs) based on which files the PR changes. Use when given a hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws PR URL and asked to review it.
11k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review GitHub pull requests for the Gumroad codebase against project guidelines, code quality, and correctness. Use when the user wants to review a PR, check new comments on a PR, provide feedback on code changes, or asks about PR quality. Triggers on: "review PR", "review this PR", "check PR #NNN", any GitHub PR URL (e.g. https://github.com/antiwork/gumroad/pull/NNNN), "what's new on the PR", "check comments", "review the diff", "give feedback on this PR", or requests to evaluate code changes in a pull request.
185 projects use a version of this
10k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Prepare for client review meetings with portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, and action items. Pulls together account data into a concise meeting-ready format. Use before quarterly reviews, annual checkups, or ad-hoc client meetings. Triggers on "client review", "meeting prep for [client]", "quarterly review", "prep for [client name]", or "client meeting".
3 projects use a version of this
41k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when reviewing changes to @wordpress/components, @wordpress/ui, or @wordpress/theme and their public contracts. For application code that only consumes these packages, use design-system-ui-review.
12k16d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Author and file a separate ASP.NET Core API review issue from an originating issue and an implementation pull request or commits. USE FOR writing API review issues, preparing api-ready-for-review proposals, filling API proposal templates, creating API review descriptions from issues and code changes, "fill out the API review", "prepare API review", or opening a pull request that changes public API. DO NOT USE FOR reviewing API design decisions, approving APIs, implementing APIs, or general code review.
39k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review pending UTM changes before they are submitted. Runs a standard correctness/quality code review of the current branch's diff AND audits it against UTM's contribution rules in CONTRIBUTING.md and AGENTS.md — scope discipline, commit/PR format, AI attribution, logging hooks, generated files, UI/design philosophy, and platform compatibility. Use this before opening or updating a UTM pull request, whenever the user asks to review UTM changes, or when the user runs /utm-review. The /utm-submit workflow expects this to have been run on the current changes first.
37k8d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review an OpenMetadata connector against golden standards. Runs multi-agent analysis covering architecture, code quality, type safety, testing, and performance. When a PR number is given, automatically posts the quality summary to the PR description and a detailed review as a PR comment.
Steady5 mentions in 2 weeks
1 project uses a version of this
16k35d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.