Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to \"review since X\".
Review guidance for ESPHome pull requests. Use this when reviewing a pull request that changes ESPHome Python, C++, or component code, to check it against the project's coding conventions, embedded-systems memory rules, testing requirements, and breaking-change policy.
Review OpenVINO changes for correctness, compatibility, performance, security, testing, and maintainability. Use when reviewing a pull request or proposed diff.
Review Orleans changes for layer contracts, invariants, minimal complexity, runtime performance, testing, and focused documentation. Use for GitHub Copilot code review and other review tasks.
Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use when asked to review code or when a shipping skill needs a review receipt. Use when asked to apply this review's findings locally. Use ce-resolve-pr-feedback for feedback already left on a PR.
26k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Use when reviewing a pull request in the deepseek-harness repo — orients the reviewer to this codebase's standards (AGENTS.md conventions, defensive patterns, ADRs, quality gates) and the review-specific checks that code alone can't show
Run a local pre-push AI code review of the current branch with the OpenAI `codex` CLI, the same way ClickHouse CI does, and optionally iterate fix and re-review until clean. Use when asked to review the current branch before pushing, run "the codex review" / "the AI review" locally, or get an independent second opinion on a diff. Not for reviewing someone else's PR on GitHub (CI already does that).
name: code-reviewer
description:
Use this skill to reviewcode. It supports both local changes (staged or working tree)
and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). It focuses
Delegation mode for open-code-review (OCR). Instead of OCR calling an LLM endpoint, this skill instructs the host agent to perform the code review itself, using OCR only for deterministic engineering: file selection and rule resolution. Use when the host agent should drive the review with its own LLM capabilities.
40k37d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the `ocr` CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply fixes when requested. With appropriate review rules, can detect various types of issues including bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and code quality concerns.
Surging6 mentions in 2 weeks
1 project uses a version of this
50k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.
Perform a static, read-only code review of an Astro pull request or of a local branch, commit range, diff, patch, or working tree being prepared as a pull request. Determine whether the change satisfies its stated business requirements and is good enough to merge, using the PR description, linked requirement issues and roadmap items, and PR or issue discussions when available. Use this skill only for PR review or self-review, not issue triage or bug investigation. It reports only merge-relevant findings and never edits code or runs project code, tests, builds, checks, or scripts.
64k3mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Code craft lens for Orleans — control flow, function shape, scope, signatures, conditions, naming, units, and compiler strictness. Use during code review, and when writing or refactoring code.
No other project uses it yet
11k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.
formbricksSkill
