Claude skills and agent skills

NVIDIASkill

review-github-pr

NVIDIA/OpenShell/.agents/skills/review-github-pr/SKILL.md

Review a GitHub pull request by summarizing its diff and key design decisions. Use when the user wants to review a PR, understand changes in a branch, or get a code review summary. Trigger keywords - review PR, review pull request, summarize PR, summarize diff, code review, review branch, PR summary, diff summary.

No other project uses it yet

wanshuiyinSkill

auto-review-loop

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/auto-review-loop/SKILL.md

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

wanshuiyinSkill

auto-review-loop

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/skills-codex/auto-review-loop/SKILL.md

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Uses a fresh Codex agent or selected Gemini, Grok, or Claude Code reviewer, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says \"auto review loop\", \"review until it passes\", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

wanshuiyinSkill

auto-review-loop

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/skills-codex-claude-review/auto-review-loop/SKILL.md

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Claude Code via claude-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says \"auto review loop\", \"review until it passes\", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

wanshuiyinSkill

auto-review-loop

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/skills-codex-gemini-review/auto-review-loop/SKILL.md

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using Gemini via gemini-review MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says \"auto review loop\", \"review until it passes\", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.

code-yeongyuSkill

pre-publish-review

code-yeongyu/oh-my-opencode/.agents/skills/pre-publish-review/SKILL.md

Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.

rendercvSkill

review-rendercv-pr

rendercv/rendercv/.claude/skills/review-rendercv-pr/SKILL.md

Review a GitHub pull request against RenderCV's codebase standards, architecture, and test requirements, then post a detailed review.

emilkowalskiSkill

review-animations

emilkowalski/skill/skills/review-animations/SKILL.md

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Often used withfind-animation-opportunities·pick-ui-library·animation-vocabulary

redisSkill

maintainer-review

redis/redis-py/.agents/skills/maintainer-review/SKILL.md

Review a GitHub issue or pull request URL as a redis-py maintainer, with a staged assessment of whether the claim is real, practically important, already solvable with supported functionality, correctly scoped, better served by another design, and worth maintainer and contributor effort. Use when assessing issue validity or severity, deciding whether an issue should be prioritized or closed, determining whether a requested feature represents an unmet need rather than a discoverability or usage gap, judging whether a PR is worth bringing to mergeable quality, comparing open PRs or alternative designs, separating code quality from repository readiness, or drafting a concise maintainer assessment. When closure, additional evidence, or code changes should be requested, also produce a polite, concise, complete, copy-paste-ready maintainer comment.

redisSkill

maintainer-review

redis/redis-py/.claude/skills/maintainer-review/SKILL.md

Review a GitHub issue or pull request URL as a redis-py maintainer, with a staged assessment of whether the claim is real, practically important, already solvable with supported functionality, correctly scoped, better served by another design, and worth maintainer and contributor effort. Use when assessing issue validity or severity, deciding whether an issue should be prioritized or closed, determining whether a requested feature represents an unmet need rather than a discoverability or usage gap, judging whether a PR is worth bringing to mergeable quality, comparing open PRs or alternative designs, separating code quality from repository readiness, or drafting a concise maintainer assessment. When closure, additional evidence, or code changes should be requested, also produce a polite, concise, complete, copy-paste-ready maintainer comment.

netdataReads credentialsSkill

repo-pr-reviews

netdata/netdata/.agents/skills/repo-pr-reviews/SKILL.md

Inspect selected PR comments or perform complete PR review triage; address verified findings when authorized. Covers GitHub review threads, bot feedback, SonarCloud findings and CI. Ordinary code review without PR-comment handling uses the relevant domain skills.

No other project uses it yet

metabaseSkill

typescript-review

metabase/metabase/.claude/skills/typescript-review/SKILL.md

Review TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.

jakubkrehelSkill

interface-review

jakubkrehel/skills/skills/interface-review/SKILL.md

Reviews a branch, pull request or uncommitted change for the interface problems it introduced or regressed, across accessibility, layout, writing, typography, color and UI.

HashiCorpSkill

review-generated

hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/.agents/skills/review-generated/SKILL.md

Review generated code in the Terraform AWS Provider (files ending in _gen.go produced by go generate). Use when a PR changes internal/service/**/*_gen.go — check whether the generator was run, whether the diff is plausible for the source change, and whether files were hand-edited. Do NOT apply hand-written-code rules to these files.

HashiCorpSkill

review-lifecycle

hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/.agents/skills/review-lifecycle/SKILL.md

Review Terraform AWS Provider resource lifecycle: CRUD step order, smerr/smarterr error handling, and AutoFlex model-to-SDK conversion. Use when reviewing a PR that changes non-test resource logic in internal/service/**/*.go (Create/Read/Update/Delete, error wrapping, flex.Expand/Flatten/Diff).

GitHubSkill

review-and-refactor

github/awesome-copilot/skills/review-and-refactor/SKILL.md

Review and refactor code in your project according to defined instructions

novuhqSkill

address-pr-review

novuhq/novu/.agents/skills/address-pr-review/SKILL.md

Critically triage pull request review comments against PR requirements and codebase reality, implement only valid fixes, and reply only when declining a suggestion. Use when the user asks to address PR comments, review feedback, CodeRabbit/Bugbot threads, or `/address-pr-review`.

GoogleReads credentialsSkill

github-pr-review

google/adk-recipes/.agents/skills/github-pr-review/SKILL.md

Review a GitHub pull request and leave inline comments in a natural human reviewing voice, indistinguishable from comments typed by hand on the GitHub web UI. Deliberately bounded to defects a reader can settle by looking at the anchored line, rather than a deep audit, so every comment is cheap for the author to check. Scales to 2-20 comments by PR size, parallelises analysis across sub-agents, drafts for approval, then posts individually with human pacing. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review PR 123", pastes a github.com/.../pull/N link, or asks for comments on a pull request. Don't use for reviewing local uncommitted changes or a diff against a branch (use the `review` skill for that).

dotnetSkill

review-public-api

dotnet/aspnetcore/.github/skills/review-public-api/SKILL.md

Review a proposed public API for the dotnet/aspnetcore repo the way the @dotnet/aspnet-api-review team would, and recommend concrete changes to the API shape. USE FOR reviewing an API proposal or api-ready-for-review issue, critiquing a ref-assembly diff, deciding whether a new or changed type/method/overload/property should be added at all, evaluating whether an API change or addition is a good idea, changing/extending an existing API or a shipped default/convention, or checking naming/namespace/nullability/async/sealing/return-type/overload/language-feature choices. Trigger phrases: "review this API", "is this API a good idea", "should we add", "API proposal", "api-ready-for-review". Produces a verdict, a need assessment (commonality + target audience), per-type bullet changes, and a diff against the existing repo API surface. DO NOT USE FOR implementing an approved API, writing analyzers, or general code review unrelated to public API surface.

dotnetSkill

review-pull-request

dotnet/aspnetcore/.github/skills/review-pull-request/SKILL.md

Review an identified ASP.NET Core pull request against a complete, frozen, trusted source-and-guidance bundle. Return source-supported findings without publishing.