Diff-scoped self-review of frontend changes under site/src against the FE pattern rules (FE1-FE10) before creating or updating a PR. Use whenever a branch diff touches site/src files.
17k32d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
MUST USE before planning, implementing, refactoring, OR reviewing any GitLab code changes (including merge request reviews, code review feedback, new features, bug fixes). Evaluate every principle group to ensure cross-domain coverage. Triggers: review, reviewing, plan, planning, implement, implementing, refactor, refactoring, MR review, code review.
25k23d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Executes the Antagonistic-Review process from the Elephant-Goldfish Model (EGM) via an automated multi-agent review loop to audit documents against qualitative standards and structural templates, and automatically apply approved fixes. Use when reviewing design docs, READMEs, feature specifications, implementation plans, or verifying document completeness and tone.
Steady81 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
14k12d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
AWS CDK regression + breaking-change reviewer. Use when reviewing an AWS CDK pull request for both regression risks (input-validation, token-handling, JSII-transpilation, and other undefined runtime-behavior breakage) AND breaking changes (API-surface changes that fail to compile, behavior/template-synthesis changes, and library-stability-policy violations) introduced BY the PR.
13k18d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
AWS CDK security reviewer. Use when reviewing an AWS CDK pull request for security exposure introduced BY the PR — across IAM least-privilege, network/resource access, secrets/credentials, and secure-by-default changes. Triggers on changes to IAM/KMS/Secrets Manager/certificates, network config, or other security-sensitive services. Leading concepts: least-privilege and secure-by-default.
13k18d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Security audit for code changes and PRs — OWASP top 10, auth flows, data handling, secrets exposure, supply chain risks. Writes findings as actionable items.
Review Terraform AWS Provider Resource Identity: the identity-strategy annotations (@ArnIdentity, @SingletonIdentity, @IdentityAttribute), multi-attribute @ImportIDHandler parsers, and region opt-out for global services. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes identity annotations or import-ID parsing in internal/service/**/*.go.
11k6mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review a Kedro PR for checklist compliance, architecture, correctness, and clarity. Optionally post findings as a GitHub PR comment. Use when the user asks to review a PR, review this PR, or do a PR review.
11k5mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Review YugabyteDB backport diffs by comparing them against their original commits/diffs. Use when the user provides a Phorge backport diff ID (e.g. D51405) and wants to verify the backport is correct, or when reviewing backport revisions.
No other project uses it yet
11k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Findings-driven targeted code review. Understands the patch via patch-explainer and surrounding code via codebase-analysis, then consults a catalog of bug patterns (~11 categories under references/categories/). Picks only categories whose diff-signals match the patch and items whose "look for" hints match actual code shapes, groups them by review focus (function/file/feature), and spawns parallel subagents — each with a tight scope and selective checklist. Use for medium-to-large patches (50-1000 LOC) as a focused alternative to whole-patch ensemble or whole-file deep review. Triggers on: "review this patch/diff/change", "find bugs in this change", "scoped review", "what could go wrong here", "review using findings", or proactive PR review.
10k5mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Render Markdown or LaTeX research artifacts to HTML or PDF with pandoc. Use when the user wants to review a written artifact, export a report, or view a rendered document.
15 projects use a version of this
10k8d agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
Comprehensive review of a pull request in the actualbudget/actual repo. Performs an offline code review against the repo's CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md and AGENTS.md (no GitHub comments are ever posted), then browser-tests the change with playwright-cli. For bug PRs, reproduces the issue on edge.actualbudget.org first and verifies the fix on the Netlify preview; for feature/enhancement PRs, exercises the change on the preview and captures annotated screenshots highlighting the new functionality. Use whenever the user asks to review, test, validate, vet, sanity-check, QA, or otherwise look at a PR / pull request in the Actual Budget repo — including phrases like "review #1234", "check this PR", "test the fix in 1234", "does PR 1234 work", "validate PR 1234", or when given a github.com/actualbudget/actual/pull/N URL. Trigger even when the user doesn't explicitly say "review".
Steady2 mentions in 2 weeks
No other project uses it yet
30k4mo agoReviewMountCreate a free account to mount
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.