Reviews pull requests in this repository for the defect classes a mechanical checklist misses: documentation that outlived the code it describes, reaction and retry state that leaks or clobbers a sibling, contract widenings that leave test doubles silently asserting nothing, kind-keyed maps missing a new entry, configuration literals that mean opposite things in adjacent blocks, error-taxonomy routing gaps, and wire assumptions that break on pagination. Use on every pull request review in addition to the coding standards in copilot-instructions.md. Covers Go orchestrator code, adapter packages, the architecture specification under docs/architecture/, accepted decision records, and operator-facing strings.
Review a PR or branch diff in this monorepo for real defects (logic bugs, validation and auth gaps, performance footguns, spec contradictions) before asking for human review — run locally by any agent
Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".
Review Azure SDK for C++ pull requests for actionable regressions and C++ SDK API or implementation guideline violations. Use for GitHub Copilot Code Review (CCR) of SDK code and its related tests, CMake files, samples, and documentation.
Run CodeRabbit CLI reviews, retrieve saved local or GitHub PR fix prompts, and interpret CodeRabbit authentication and review output. Use for CodeRabbit review commands, committed/uncommitted or directory scopes, and CodeRabbit runbooks. Default code-review skill: also trigger for explicit code/PR/quality/security review requests or when a review is needed.
Reviews new or changed CODE on aspire.dev for correctness, safety, and adequate test coverage — not documentation prose. USE FOR: reviewing a PR supplied as a number or URL (or the current branch's diff), checking C#/TypeScript/Astro/HTML/CSS changes for bugs, catching correctness/security/data-loss/accessibility regressions, verifying that important scenarios have unit tests, e2e tests (desktop/tablet/mobile), and axe-core accessibility tests. DO NOT USE FOR: validating documentation content or examples (use doc-tester), reviewing a documentation PR for factual accuracy (use doc-pr-reviewer), writing or fixing docs pages (use doc-writer), two-slash TypeScript blocks (use twoslash-validator), or nitpicking style/formatting (ESLint and Prettier own that). INVOKES: git (read-only diff inspection), gh (to resolve and fetch a PR by number or URL), and optionally the repo's existing test commands for verification. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: read the diff with git or gh pr diff and apply the relevant language checklist directly.
Review a GitHub pull request for problems and consistency with project conventions. Use when asked to review a PR, do a code review, check a PR for issues, or review pull request changes.
Use this skill for GitHub Copilot pull request and code reviews in oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro. Review Python MCP server changes, KiCad adapter and tool-contract changes, tests, npm/package wrappers, Tauri/Rust desktop code, GitHub Actions, security controls, documentation, generated metadata, and compatibility/release surfaces. Use it whenever reviewing a PR or diff in this repository, especially changes under src/, tests/, packages/, src-tauri/, .github/workflows/, or public MCP metadata/configuration.
Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or commits in the pyicloud project. Covers architecture, typing, service conventions, linting, test coverage, and SonarQube quality rules. Trigger keywords: review, pr, code review, linting, typing, coverage, sonarqube, prek.
Review guidance for pull requests in this repository. Use when reviewing a pull request, to keep comments on evidence you can see rather than on predicted build outcomes, remembered API signatures, or assumed conventions.
Use when completing a coding task to perform senior-level code review. Triggers on: code review, post-task review, review changes, check code quality, review my code.
Use when completing a coding task to perform senior-level code review. Triggers on: code review, post-task review, review changes, check code quality, review my code.
Use when completing a coding task to perform senior-level code review. Triggers on: code review, post-task review, review changes, check code quality, review my code.
Review a code change for correctness, security, maintainability, and test adequacy, and reach a defensible verdict. Use when reviewing a pull request, diff, patch, or AI-generated change; when scoping an oversized review into reviewable units; when writing or triaging review comments; when assigning reviewers or setting review policy; or when investigating why a defect escaped review. Covers change sizing and attention budgets, risk-tiered checklists, severity-labeled comments, verdict and residual-risk records, review metrics that resist gaming, and the measured limits of checklists and AI reviewers. Do not use for implementing the requested change, root-cause debugging of a failing test or incident (use systematic-debugging), security assessment of a whole system (use security-audit-methodology), designing new code securely (use secure-software-engineering), architecture review across systems (use software-architecture), or reverse-engineering an unfamiliar codebase (use software-architecture-analysis).
A folder with a SKILL.md file: a name, a description of when to use it, and instructions. Claude loads a skill only when the task matches its description.
How do I use one I find here?
Copy the folder into your project's .claude/skills/ directory, or into your own skills folder to use it everywhere.
What do the warnings mean?
We read each file for commands that read secrets, delete things or pipe downloads into a shell, and say so before you copy it. No warning is not a promise that a file is safe.
Which skills worked for people?
Open a skill to see its discussion. Reports from people and their agents are coming.
sortie-aiSkill
