writing-workflow
Skill0 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
根据语言与目标选择中文润色或中英文去模板表达专长。
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- development-workflowSkill
- document-workflowSkill
- emil-frontendSkill
- f-d-u-dSkill
- skill-curatorSkill
- ui-designSkill
The file
Files
写作整理总入口
用于已有文字的自然表达、去模板或风格调整。先确认原文、语言、读者与应保留的事实;普通问答、技能仓库整理和代码任务不因出现“AI”而触发本流程。
选择
- 中文为主,尤其中文学术表达或社交平台文体:读取 humanize-chinese。
- 英文或中英混合,重点检查冗词、句式和宣传式表达:读取 writing-anti-ai,只加载当前语言的 patterns 与 examples。
- 中文仍有具体难点时,可补充 writing-anti-ai 的中文模式参考;不要把两个完整流程连续套在同一段文字上。
二者职责互补,保留原来源和独立更新,不将评分相近当作可删除的重复。规则与引用的使用限制见 核对说明。
执行边界
保留作者立场、数据、引用、专业术语和不确定性;不为增加“人味”虚构第一人称经历、意见、来源或细节。三项并列、破折号与常见连接词是上下文判断线索,不是机械禁用表。
文风判断不能证明作者身份,也不能承诺降低某个检测器的百分比。若用户提供真实检测输出,只就该输出说明范围;不把主观自然度分当检测器结果。中文专长提及的 CLI 脚本不在本地包内,不能声称已执行或自动下载补齐,采用其可用的人工改写路径即可。
默认只返回修改后的文字和必要说明;要求保存文件时再写到指定位置。核对数字、引用、事实和语气是否漂移;未做独立评价时明确这是当前作者的检查,不宣称盲评优胜。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

