agentleFS
siemenssiemens/ix/.agents/skills/changeset-decision/SKILL.md

changeset-decision

Skill390 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub

Decide whether IX changes need a changeset, which packages to include, and draft the changeset summary. Use for pull requests, code reviews, component changes, styling or theming updates, accessibility changes, public API changes, behavior changes, and internal-only change classification in the Siemens IX monorepo.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈13

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check whether linked issues or release details should appear in the changeset summary.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    If impact is unclear, prefer adding a changeset or explicitly state why one is not needed.

    line 42
  3. Distinctive:

    If yes or unclear, require a changeset.

    line 49
  4. Distinctive:

    If no, state that the change is internal-only and explain why.

    line 50
  5. Distinctive:

    If a changeset is required, identify the affected packages.

    line 51
  6. Very specific:

    If the work is linked to a GitHub issue, include Fixes #<issue-number> in the changeset summary.

    line 54
  7. Distinctive:

    If the change is breaking, make sure the summary clearly explains the break and any migration steps.

    line 55
  8. Very specific:

    If the change introduces a new component, property, method, or event, verify that JSDoc includes an @since tag aligned with the expected …

    line 56
  9. Very specific:

    Use @siemens/ix for core component, styling, theme, token, and behavior changes in packages/core.

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    Avoid adding unaffected packages only because generated files changed.

    line 64
  11. Distinctive:

    When evaluating a change, report the result in this structure:

    line 68
  12. Very specific:

    Follow-up checks: mention @since, accessibility coverage, or storybook coverage when relevant.

    line 75
  13. Distinctive:

    Write the summary in release-note language, describing the consumer-visible outcome.

    line 79
  14. Distinctive:

    Keep the summary specific to the affected packages.

    line 80
  15. Distinctive:

    If the change is internal-only, do not invent a changeset.

    line 81
  16. Distinctive:

    If the package list is uncertain, say so and explain which repository surfaces need confirmation.

    line 82
  17. Distinctive:

    If no changeset is added, the review should explicitly confirm the change is internal-only.

    line 112

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Changeset Decision

When to Use

  • Determine whether a change in the IX monorepo requires a changeset.
  • Review a pull request for missing or incomplete changesets.
  • Decide whether a change is user-facing or internal-only.
  • Choose which packages belong in the changeset.
  • Draft the changeset summary and package entries.
  • Check whether linked issues or release details should appear in the changeset summary.

Decision Criteria

A changeset is required when the change is relevant for end users or downstream consumers. Treat the following as requiring a changeset unless the user explicitly established the change is internal-only:

  • Public API changes.
  • Component behavior changes.
  • Styling or theming changes.
  • Accessibility changes.
  • Bug fixes that materially affect users.
  • Documentation changes that affect usage expectations.
  • Design token or theme changes.
  • Generated wrapper changes when consumer behavior or API usage changes.

A changeset is usually not required when the change is clearly internal-only and has no consumer impact, for example:

  • Refactors with unchanged behavior.
  • Test-only updates.
  • Tooling or CI changes.
  • Internal build configuration changes.
  • Documentation edits with no usage impact.

If impact is unclear, prefer adding a changeset or explicitly state why one is not needed.

Procedure

  1. Inspect the changed files and summarize the effective user impact, not just the implementation detail.
  2. Classify the change as one of: public API, behavior, styling or theming, accessibility, documentation affecting usage, bug fix, or internal-only.
  3. Decide whether downstream consumers would notice the change in release notes.
  4. If yes or unclear, require a changeset.
  5. If no, state that the change is internal-only and explain why.
  6. If a changeset is required, identify the affected packages.
  7. Include only relevant packages in the changeset. Do not add wrapper packages unless the wrapper surface or consumer experience is affected.
  8. Draft the changeset with the affected package entries and a concise summary focused on consumer impact.
  9. If the work is linked to a GitHub issue, include Fixes #<issue-number> in the changeset summary.
  10. If the change is breaking, make sure the summary clearly explains the break and any migration steps.
  11. If the change introduces a new component, property, method, or event, verify that JSDoc includes an @since tag aligned with the expected release type.
  12. Mention accessibility coverage and storybook coverage when the change affects component behavior, UI states, or user interaction.

Package Selection Guidance

  • Use @siemens/ix for core component, styling, theme, token, and behavior changes in packages/core.
  • Include framework wrappers only when the wrapper package itself exposes a consumer-visible change.
  • Include @siemens/ix-aggrid or @siemens/ix-echarts only when their package behavior, theme output, or public usage changes.
  • Avoid adding unaffected packages only because generated files changed.

Review Output Format

When evaluating a change, report the result in this structure:

  1. Changeset required: yes or no.
  2. Reason: one short explanation tied to consumer impact.
  3. Affected packages: explicit package list or none.
  4. Draft changeset: either a proposed changeset block or not needed.
  5. Changeset notes: required summary details such as issue link, breaking-change migration note, or internal-only justification.
  6. Follow-up checks: mention @since, accessibility coverage, or storybook coverage when relevant.

Drafting Guidance

  • Write the summary in release-note language, describing the consumer-visible outcome.
  • Keep the summary specific to the affected packages.
  • If the change is internal-only, do not invent a changeset; explain why none is needed.
  • If the package list is uncertain, say so and explain which repository surfaces need confirmation.

Example Draft Output

Changeset required: yes
Reason: The component styling change affects the rendered appearance for consumers.
Affected packages: @siemens/ix
Draft changeset:

---

## '@siemens/ix': patch

Adjust component styling so the updated visual state is applied consistently.

Changeset notes: Add `Fixes #1234` if this work resolves the linked issue.
Follow-up checks: Verify component accessibility coverage and storybook coverage for the new visual state.

Examples

  • Use the changeset-decision skill for this PR. I changed a core component SCSS file and updated a React example.
  • Determine whether my accessibility fix in tabs needs a changeset and which package to include.
  • Review these changed files and tell me if this is internal-only or release-note worthy.
  • Review my diff and draft the changeset I should add for this bug fix.

Repo Rules Captured By This Skill

  • Missing changesets are review issues for user-facing or consumer-relevant changes.
  • If no changeset is added, the review should explicitly confirm the change is internal-only.
  • New component APIs should be checked for correct @since tags based on the expected release version.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.