paper-framework-figure-studio-pro
Skill11 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when planning a source-grounded method overview, architecture, pipeline, system/data-flow, mechanism, or agent-workflow figure for a CS or deep-learning paper. Produces an editable figure brief before image generation or manual redrawing; not for plots, tables, or general prose.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- asimfish/super_teasertheir own version, first seen Sep 5, 2026
- tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 22, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- tuoxie2046/claude-code-research-skills★ 5same name
- asimfish/super_teaser★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- app-bug-forensicsSkill
- app-feature-craftSkill
- app-release-readinessSkill
- codex-session-restoreSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- experiment-plannerSkill
- feishu-paper-readingSkill
- github-project-releaseSkill
- grill-meSkill
- paper-review-panelSkill
- paper-share-htmlSkill
- paper-visual-craftSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- rebuttal-response-skillsSkill
- research-evidenceSkill
- search-firstSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Treat image generation as opt-in.
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep the workflow human-in-the-loop.
- Distinctive: line 25
Stop after S5. The human chooses the final candidate, performs manual redrawing/editing, and decides final caption and paper placement.
- Distinctive: line 32
Before designing the figure, identify the available evidence:
- Distinctive: line 44
If inputs are incomplete, state the assumptions and ask only for missing facts that materially affect the diagram contract.
- Very specific: line 50
Use references/workflow.md when a task needs the full staged process.
- Distinctive: line 58
S2 Sketch exploration: only if explicitly requested, generate or describe first-round candidate directions.
- Distinctive: line 64
S5 Candidate image: only if explicitly requested, generate final raster candidates.
- Distinctive: line 72
Every visible entity, label, symbol, connector, and visual metaphor must be:
- Distinctive: line 78
Use these checks before proposing prompts or candidates:
- Distinctive: line 80
Do arrows have evidence for both source and target semantics?
- Distinctive: line 89
If the contract is not supportable, stop at the risk register and ask for the missing paper detail or user decision.
- Very specific: line 107
Use templates/figure-brief-template.md when the user asks for a structured brief or when a worker needs a handoff.
- Very specific: line 112
Read references/source-map.md before discussing provenance, upstream licensing, or vault updates.
- Very specific: line 114
Read references/workflow.md before running a full S0-S5 planning session.
- Very specific: line 115
Use templates/figure-brief-template.md for reusable handoff briefs.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Paper Framework Figure Studio Pro
This is a lightweight local adapter inspired by
c-narcissus/paper-framework-figure-studio-pro. It keeps the useful
paper-grounded S0-S5 co-design flow while avoiding the upstream package's heavy
asset vendoring, mandatory checkpoint zip behavior, and fixed personal response
rules.
Default Boundaries
- Work in conversation by default. Do not create project files, reports, checkpoints, generated images, or restore bundles unless the user explicitly asks for them.
- Treat image generation as opt-in. S2 and S5 are planning handoff stages unless the user explicitly asks to generate images.
- Keep the workflow human-in-the-loop. Execute at most one public stage per response unless the user explicitly requests a compact text-only bundle such as "do S0/S1 together."
- Stop after S5. The human chooses the final candidate, performs manual redrawing/editing, and decides final caption and paper placement.
- Route final plot/table polish, Matplotlib/LaTeX edits, captions, and rendered
validation to
$paper-visual-craft.
Input Discipline
Before designing the figure, identify the available evidence:
- Paper source: PDF, LaTeX, abstract/method text, notes, or user summary.
- Target role: method overview, architecture, pipeline, data flow, mechanism, or agent workflow.
- Venue/style constraints: CVPR/ICCV/ECCV/NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML/CoRL, double column, grayscale safety, line-art preference, space budget.
- Existing visuals: reference figures, current draft figure, or explicit instruction not to inspect an existing paper diagram.
- User constraints: must-show modules, forbidden claims, terminology, symbols, and whether image generation is allowed.
If inputs are incomplete, state the assumptions and ask only for missing facts that materially affect the diagram contract. Do not invent paper modules, symbols, arrows, metrics, or evidence.
Local S0-S5 Workflow
Use references/workflow.md when a task needs the full staged process.
- S0 Paper foundation: inventory sources, extract core modules, terms, equations/symbols, data/control/model flow, evidence anchors, and ambiguity risks.
- S1 Figure strategy: define the reader question, figure type, story path, semantic graph, visible text budget, style family, and source-grounded prompt contract.
- S2 Sketch exploration: only if explicitly requested, generate or describe first-round candidate directions. Default to text-only candidate briefs.
- S3 Direction select: compare candidates against the source contract and user preference; record what to keep, avoid, simplify, or repair.
- S4 Formal candidate brief: prepare the final candidate matrix or image prompts with strict source-fidelity, symbol, connector, and density rules.
- S5 Candidate image: only if explicitly requested, generate final raster candidates. Otherwise hand off prompt packages or a manual-redraw brief.
For ordinary requests, start with S0/S1 and return a concise figure brief rather than a full staged dossier.
Source-Faithful Figure Contract
Every visible entity, label, symbol, connector, and visual metaphor must be:
- directly supported by the paper/user material, or
- explicitly marked as an inference with the reasoning chain, or
- marked unsupported and excluded from the figure.
Use these checks before proposing prompts or candidates:
- Do arrows have evidence for both source and target semantics?
- Are variables, metrics, weights, losses, or thresholds shown as edge/port/tag information instead of peer modules when appropriate?
- Does one symbol/color/line style mean exactly one thing?
- Is the diagram explaining the paper's actual contribution rather than a generic architecture pattern?
- Can dense details move to caption, legend, or prose without weakening the first-glance story?
If the contract is not supportable, stop at the risk register and ask for the missing paper detail or user decision.
Default Output
Unless the user requested files or images, answer in conversation with:
figure rolereader questionsource-backed core modulessemantic flowvisible text contractstyle / surface recommendationmust-include / must-excluderisks or unsupported partscandidate directionsnext action
Use templates/figure-brief-template.md when the user asks for a structured
brief or when a worker needs a handoff.
Reference Routing
- Read
references/source-map.mdbefore discussing provenance, upstream licensing, or vault updates. - Read
references/workflow.mdbefore running a full S0-S5 planning session. - Use
templates/figure-brief-template.mdfor reusable handoff briefs.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

