agentleFS
shinprshinpr/claude-code-workflows/skills/integration-e2e-testing/SKILL.md

integration-e2e-testing

Skill712 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Defines integration/E2E skeleton annotations, lane and file contracts, and route-parity review criteria. Use when generating or consuming test skeletons or reviewing shared mutation routes.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use the project's comment syntax to wrap these annotations (e.g., // for C-family, # for Python/Ruby/Shell).

    line 30
  2. Distinctive:

    When verification points need explicit enumeration:

    line 34

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Integration and E2E Skeleton Contracts

Test Lanes

LaneObservable boundaryDependencies
integrationInteractions within a process, including framework-rendered UI and module/API handlersReal participating components; mock only outside the claimed boundary
fixture-e2eActual UI behavior in a real browser with deterministic fixturesFixtures may replace dependencies outside the claimed boundary
service-integration-e2eOutcome depends on actual cross-service interaction or persistenceRequired local services and stores are real; stubs only outside that proof boundary

Test Skeleton Specification

Required Comment Patterns

Each test MUST include the following annotations:

AC: [Original acceptance criteria text]
Behavior: [Trigger] → [Process] → [Observable Result]
@lane: integration | fixture-e2e | service-integration-e2e
@dependency: none | [component names] | full-system
Selection evidence: [required claim, uncovered failure, and why cheaper existing proof is insufficient]

Use the project's comment syntax to wrap these annotations (e.g., // for C-family, # for Python/Ruby/Shell).

Verification Items (Optional)

When verification points need explicit enumeration:

Verification items:
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]

Test File Naming Convention

  • Integration tests: *.int.test.* or *.integration.test.*
  • fixture-e2e tests: *.fixture.e2e.test.* (or organize under tests/e2e/fixture/)
  • service-integration-e2e tests: *.service.e2e.test.* (or organize under tests/e2e/service/)

The test runner or framework in the project determines the appropriate file extension. Repos that already use a single *.e2e.test.* convention may keep it as long as each file declares @lane: in its header — the lane annotation is the source of truth for routing.

Route Parity for Shared Mutations

When multiple routes reach the same mutation, compare validation, classification, resource bounds, and read/parse/mutation/reporting order. A difference becomes a proof obligation when it can violate an authoritative contract or expose a material bypass in the changed boundary. Reuse existing proof or add the smallest test that detects that failure.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.