integration-e2e-testing
Skill712 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Defines integration/E2E skeleton annotations, lane and file contracts, and route-parity review criteria. Use when generating or consuming test skeletons or reviewing shared mutation routes.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- shinpr/ai-coding-project-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shinpr/agentic-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- shinpr/codex-workflowstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- shinpr/ai-coding-project-boilerplate★ 236same name
- shinpr/agentic-code★ 51same name
- shinpr/codex-workflows★ 39same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-development-guideSkill
- coding-principlesSkill
- documentation-criteriaSkill
- external-resource-contextSkill
- implementation-approachSkill
- llm-friendly-contextSkill
- recipe-add-integration-testsSkill
- recipe-buildSkill
- recipe-designSkill
- recipe-diagnoseSkill
- recipe-front-adjustSkill
- recipe-front-buildSkill
- recipe-front-designSkill
- recipe-front-planSkill
- recipe-front-reviewSkill
- recipe-fullstack-buildSkill
- recipe-fullstack-implementSkill
- recipe-implementSkill
- recipe-planSkill
- recipe-quality-profileSkill
- recipe-reverse-engineerSkill
- recipe-reviewSkill
- recipe-update-docSkill
- requirement-convergenceSkill
- subagents-orchestration-guideSkill
- testing-principlesSkill
- typescript-rulesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 30
Use the project's comment syntax to wrap these annotations (e.g., // for C-family, # for Python/Ruby/Shell).
- Distinctive: line 34
When verification points need explicit enumeration:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Integration and E2E Skeleton Contracts
Test Lanes
| Lane | Observable boundary | Dependencies |
integration | Interactions within a process, including framework-rendered UI and module/API handlers | Real participating components; mock only outside the claimed boundary |
fixture-e2e | Actual UI behavior in a real browser with deterministic fixtures | Fixtures may replace dependencies outside the claimed boundary |
service-integration-e2e | Outcome depends on actual cross-service interaction or persistence | Required local services and stores are real; stubs only outside that proof boundary |
Test Skeleton Specification
Required Comment Patterns
Each test MUST include the following annotations:
AC: [Original acceptance criteria text]
Behavior: [Trigger] → [Process] → [Observable Result]
@lane: integration | fixture-e2e | service-integration-e2e
@dependency: none | [component names] | full-system
Selection evidence: [required claim, uncovered failure, and why cheaper existing proof is insufficient]Use the project's comment syntax to wrap these annotations (e.g., // for C-family, # for Python/Ruby/Shell).
Verification Items (Optional)
When verification points need explicit enumeration:
Verification items:
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]Test File Naming Convention
- Integration tests:
*.int.test.*or*.integration.test.* - fixture-e2e tests:
*.fixture.e2e.test.*(or organize undertests/e2e/fixture/) - service-integration-e2e tests:
*.service.e2e.test.*(or organize undertests/e2e/service/)
The test runner or framework in the project determines the appropriate file extension. Repos that already use a single *.e2e.test.* convention may keep it as long as each file declares @lane: in its header — the lane annotation is the source of truth for routing.
Route Parity for Shared Mutations
When multiple routes reach the same mutation, compare validation, classification, resource bounds, and read/parse/mutation/reporting order. A difference becomes a proof obligation when it can violate an authoritative contract or expose a material bypass in the changed boundary. Reuse existing proof or add the smallest test that detects that failure.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

