security-review
Skill25 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review authorized application code, configuration, designs or artifacts for concrete authorization, data exposure, injection, secret, dependency and LLM/tool security risks. Use for a requested security review or a change affecting a trust boundary.
Files
Security Review
Load the review method; use Research when dependency/advisory claims need current evidence. Reuse existing fix/testing authority; review alone adds no remediation or live-exploitation authority.
flowchart LR
R[Code Review method] -->|Current dependency / advisory evidence| D[Research]
click R "../code-review/references/review.md"
click D "../research/SKILL.md"- Trace = sensitive asset + caller/input + required permission → actual enforcing owner → operation/data. UI visibility or a caller's check does not prove server authorization.
- Coverage = focused change → affected path + adjacent callers; broad review → actual entry points + assets, then relevant surfaces below. Mark material missing evidence.
| Surface | Resolve |
| Identity / sessions | Caller-selected identity, role or tenant; login, recovery, expiry + revocation boundaries. |
| Data / privilege | Actor + tenant enforcement for object, field, list/export + mutation; alternate entry points. |
| Input / files | Query, markup, URL, path, upload/archive → normalization + downstream parser, fetch, storage or execution. Path built from input or config before delete/overwrite → resolved path stays inside the intended root. |
| Secrets / artifacts | Source, logs, client bundle, generated config + packaged output exposure; inspect the actual in-scope artifact. Internal address alone ≠ secret. Exposed live secret → rotate/revoke first; history rewrite alone ≠ fix. |
| Personal data | Collection → storage, logs, analytics, exports + backups → retention + deletion; each copy has an owner + delete path. |
| LLM / tools | Untrusted content influencing privileged actions; permissions + validated arguments outside the model; required approval at the action boundary. |
| Dependencies | Resolved lockfile/image/SBOM/runtime version + existing scan + primary advisory ranges. Trace production/build/dev/transitive use; manifest range ≠ resolved version. Confirmed vulnerable version ≠ proven exploitability; unknown reachability never waives a required gate. |
- Finding = entry point + actor/input preconditions + enforcing/missing control + affected asset + realistic impact. Test competing explanations through source + permitted probes; unproven exploit path stays unknown.
- Secret evidence = type + location + exposure path; mask values. Keep findings, optional hardening + unresolved questions distinct.
- Authorized fix = smallest control satisfying the requirement; verify original unauthorized path denied + legitimate access preserved at the actual permission/input boundary. Run applicable gates.
- Result = assessed surfaces + findings + gaps. Scanner success proves only its checked scope; no whole-application certification or implied runtime proof.
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- sgaabdu4/appwrite-backend★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- affaan-m/ECC★ 246ksame name
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- langfuse/langfuse★ 37ksame name
- nearai/ironclaw★ 13ksame name
- joe-bell/cva★ 6.9ksame name
- doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper★ 5.5ksame name
- compozy/compozy★ 2.8ksame name
- getsentry/sentry-python★ 2.2ksame name
- trycompai/comp★ 2.1ksame name
- xu-xiang/everything-claude-code-zh★ 1.9ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use dependency-cve-sweep, fleet-standard-adoption and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
berntpoppSkilldependency-cve-sweep
Use when handling Dependabot PRs, CodeQL/Trivy alerts, or doing a routine dependency/CVE sweep for this repo.
Also in 12 projects that use this
berntpoppSkillfleet-standard-adoption
Use when bringing this repo into compliance with a GeneFoundry fleet standard (tool-naming, response-envelope, container-hardening, versioning, MCP transport, or logging) or closing its tracking issue.
Also in 12 projects that use this
niloykumarbarmanSkillagent-sort
Build an evidence-backed ECC install plan for a specific repo by sorting skills, commands, rules, hooks, and extras into DAILY vs LIBRARY buckets using parallel repo-aware review passes. Use when ECC should be trimmed to what a project actually needs instead of loading the full bundle.
Also in 12 projects that use this
ysyecustSkillbrand-discovery
Use when a brand needs to discover or articulate its identity through structured multi-session interviews. Covers purpose, positioning, audience, personality, voice, narrative, and founder-brand tension across 8 modules using laddering, 5 Whys, and projective techniques. Produces a resumable session with disk-persisted state and a master brandbook (90_SYNTHESIS.md).
Also in 5 projects that use this
InfopibeSkilleverything-claude-code
Also in 11 projects that use this
royaluniondesign-sysSkillconfigure-ecc
Interactive installer for Everything Claude Code — guides users through selecting and installing skills and rules to user-level or project-level directories, verifies paths, and optionally optimizes installed files.
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +2 more from berntpopp
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- building-flutter-appsSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- e2eSkill
- he-buildSkill
- he-learnSkill
- he-planSkill
- he-shipSkill
- heSkill
- marketing-videoSkill
- product-walkthrough-videoSkill
- researchSkill
- writing-great-skillsSkill
- building-flutter-appsSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

