agentleFS
serbanghitaserbanghita/plan-critique-skills/.github/skills/plan-execute/SKILL.md

plan-execute

Skill13 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute the user's plan that has been iteratively refined, step by step, with resume on failure. Use when the user runs /plan-execute or asks to execute an existing plan.

7 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

50 rules. 0 are common, 30 are distinctive, and 20 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 30

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 20

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the working agreement at working-agreement.md before step 1 and follow it for the whole run.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Never report a step as done, fixed or working until you have run the tests and shown the output.

    line 20
  3. Very specific:

    Never add yourself as a co-author and never append a Co-Authored-By or Generated-with trailer to a commit.

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    Commit only when the user answers yes to the per-step commit prompt.

    line 31
  5. Very specific:

    Read .copilot/plan-critique-config.json and get plansFolder path from settings.

    line 40
  6. Very specific:

    If neither file exists or plansFolder is not set or is an empty string: Respond with "No plans folder configured.

    line 42
  7. Very specific:

    If the variable is empty, use the literal value default instead.

    line 46
  8. Very specific:

    Read the current session's plan from [plansFolder]/.sessions/[sessionId] if it exists.

    line 49
  9. Very specific:

    If no plan folders exist: Respond with "No plans found.

    line 52
  10. Very specific:

    If sessionPlan exists and matches a plan folder, auto-select it.

    line 54
  11. Very specific:

    Update the session file [plansFolder]/.sessions/[sessionId] with the selected plan slug (create if needed).

    line 67
  12. Very specific:

    If [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/plan.md does not exist: Respond with "No plan.md found."

    line 69
  13. Very specific:

    If plan.md is empty: Respond with "Plan file is empty.

    line 70
  14. Distinctive:

    Read the project instructions from the project root if they exist.

    line 71
  15. Very specific:

    Read [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/critique.md if it exists.

    line 73
  16. Distinctive:

    Use the critique as supplementary context during execution: implementation hints, alternative approaches, and risk warnings from the …

    line 75
  17. Very specific:

    If critique.md does not exist, warn: "This plan has not been critiqued.

    line 78
  18. Distinctive:

    Check git status by running git status.

    line 80
  19. Distinctive:

    If git repo and clean: inform user "Git available.

    line 81
  20. Distinctive:

    If git repo and dirty: warn "Uncommitted changes detected.

    line 82
  21. Distinctive:

    If not a git repo: inform "Not a git repository.

    line 84
  22. Very specific:

    If found, record the command that runs the suite and inform the user: "Test suite detected: [command].

    line 89
  23. Distinctive:

    If not found, inform the user: "No test infrastructure detected.

    line 91
  24. Very specific:

    Check for existing execution state.

    line 95
  25. Distinctive:

    Wait for user response before proceeding.

    line 97
  26. Distinctive:

    Use Glob and Grep to estimate which existing files each step is likely to affect.

    line 115
  27. Distinctive:

    Wait for the user to confirm or request changes to the ordering.

    line 130
  28. Very specific:

    Before each step, update execution-state.json with current progress including stepStartedAt (see execution-state-format.md).

    line 133
  29. Distinctive:

    Ask for explicit user permission before high-risk operations:

    line 135
  30. Distinctive:

    If tests are available (step 12), write the test for this step before writing any implementation code.

    line 141
  31. Distinctive:

    Run it, show the output, and confirm it fails for the expected reason.

    line 142
  32. Distinctive:

    After the step completes, run verification:

    line 147
  33. Distinctive:

    If tests are available (step 12), run the suite with the recorded command and show the output verbatim.

    line 148
  34. Distinctive:

    Do not mark the step COMPLETED until the tests pass.

    line 149
  35. Distinctive:

    If tests are not available, state plainly that the step is unverified by tests and say what evidence you do have, such as the diff or the …

    line 151
  36. Distinctive:

    Use code intelligence on files modified in this step to surface errors and warnings.

    line 153
  37. Distinctive:

    If new errors are found, inform the user and ask: "Fix now, continue, or stop?"

    line 155
  38. Distinctive:

    If git is available (step 11), offer to commit:

    line 160
  39. Distinctive:

    If the user chose "yes-to-all", commit subsequent steps automatically without asking.

    line 162
  40. Very specific:

    Commit message format: plan-execute: [plan-slug] step N - [brief description]

    line 163
  41. Very specific:

    Never append a Co-Authored-By or Generated-with trailer to the commit message.

    line 164
  42. Distinctive:

    If a step introduces architectural patterns that should be documented in the project instructions, flag this to the user immediately rather …

    line 168
  43. Very specific:

    Stop execution - save state, stop.

    line 178
  44. Distinctive:

    Wait for user choice.

    line 179
  45. Distinctive:

    If tests are available (step 12), run the full suite one last time and show the output.

    line 181
  46. Distinctive:

    If tests are not available, say so explicitly in the final message rather than implying verification.

    line 184
  47. Distinctive:

    Update execution log with final summary.

    line 185
  48. Distinctive:

    If git was used, mention the commit count: "Plan executed across N commits.

    line 187
  49. Distinctive:

    Never continue past a failed step automatically.

    line 193
  50. Distinctive:

    Keep the execution log updated in real-time.

    line 194

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

You are executing the user's plan that has been iteratively refined.

Fixed rules:

Read the working agreement at working-agreement.md before step 1 and follow it for the whole run. If that path does not resolve, look for working-agreement.md in the project root, then in .github/. If it cannot be found anywhere, tell the user it is missing and apply the rules listed below.

These rules bind this phase and override any step below that conflicts with them:

  1. Never report a step as done, fixed or working until you have run the tests and shown the output. A step whose tests were not run is reported as unverified, never as COMPLETED.
  2. Where the project has test infrastructure, write the test for a step first, confirm it fails, then implement until it passes. Never modify an existing test to make it pass. Where there is no test infrastructure, say so at step 12 and continue without inventing one.
  3. Prove claims with evidence: command output, a file:line reference, or a diff. Never assert a plausible but unverified result.
  4. Re-read the working agreement, the project instructions, and the relevant plan sections before touching a new area of the codebase, especially in a long run.
  5. Output complete file contents. Never truncate code with "... rest of code ..." placeholders.
  6. Never add yourself as a co-author and never append a Co-Authored-By or Generated-with trailer to a commit. Commit only when the user answers yes to the per-step commit prompt. Answering yes-to-all authorises the remaining steps of this run only, and nothing beyond it.
  7. Be brief. No filler, no preamble. No emojis, no em dashes in code, comments, docs or commit messages.

In this skill, "project instructions" means the first of these files that exists in the project root: .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, or CLAUDE.md.

To do this, follow these steps precisely:

  1. Read .copilot/plan-critique-config.json and get plansFolder path from settings. If that file does not exist, read .claude/plan-critique-config.json instead. If neither file exists or plansFolder is not set or is an empty string: Respond with "No plans folder configured. Run /plan-create first to set up."
  2. Get the Copilot CLI session id from the COPILOT_AGENT_SESSION_ID environment variable. Read it with echo $COPILOT_AGENT_SESSION_ID on macOS or Linux, or $env:COPILOT_AGENT_SESSION_ID on Windows. If the variable is empty, use the literal value default instead. Store this as sessionId.
  3. Clean up stale sessions: scan [plansFolder]/.sessions/ for files and delete every file that has not been modified in the last 7 days. This is non-blocking cleanup, never abort the run because of it.
  4. Read the current session's plan from [plansFolder]/.sessions/[sessionId] if it exists. Store as sessionPlan.
  5. Scan [plansFolder]/ for subdirectories (each subdirectory is a plan). Exclude archived/ and .sessions/ folders and any files, only list plan directories. If no plan folders exist: Respond with "No plans found. Create one with /plan-create".
  6. Select the plan to execute:
    • If sessionPlan exists and matches a plan folder, auto-select it. Inform the user: "Using current session plan: [sessionPlan]"
    • Else if only one plan exists, auto-select it and inform user.
    • Otherwise, ask the user to select a plan from the list. Example:
      Available plans:
      1. add-user-authentication
      2. refactor-database-layer
      3. implement-caching
      
      Which plan would you like to execute? [1-3]
  7. Update the session file [plansFolder]/.sessions/[sessionId] with the selected plan slug (create if needed).
  8. Check prerequisites:
    • If [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/plan.md does not exist: Respond with "No plan.md found."
    • If plan.md is empty: Respond with "Plan file is empty. Run /plan-critique first."
  9. Read the project instructions from the project root if they exist. Hold those standards as context and ensure compliance during each execution step. If none exist, note this but do not block execution.
  10. Read [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/critique.md if it exists. Note the iteration number and summary. Inform the user: "Plan was critiqued (iteration N). Last critique summary: [brief]." Use the critique as supplementary context during execution: implementation hints, alternative approaches, and risk warnings from the critique are relevant when executing related steps. Do not treat the critique as authoritative since the user chose what to incorporate into plan.md. If critique.md does not exist, warn: "This plan has not been critiqued. Run /plan-critique first, or confirm you want to proceed without review." Wait for user confirmation before continuing.
  11. Check git status by running git status.
    • If git repo and clean: inform user "Git available. Per-step commits will be offered after each step."
    • If git repo and dirty: warn "Uncommitted changes detected. Recommend committing or stashing before execution to enable clean per-step rollback." Wait for user acknowledgement.
    • If not a git repo: inform "Not a git repository. Per-step commits are not available." Store whether git is available for later use.
  12. Detect test infrastructure. Look for a test runner and existing tests: a test script in package.json, pytest.ini or tox.ini, phpunit.xml, a go.mod alongside _test.go files, Cargo.toml, a tests/, test/ or __tests__/ directory, or a Makefile target named test.
    • If found, record the command that runs the suite and inform the user: "Test suite detected: [command]. Tests-first is binding for every step of this run."
    • If not found, inform the user: "No test infrastructure detected. Steps will be verified by diagnostics and diffs only, and results will be reported as unverified." Do not create a test harness the project does not already have. Store the test command and whether tests are available for later use.
  13. Check for existing execution state. If [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/execution-state.json exists, read it and prompt: "Previous execution found at step [X] of [total]. Resume or restart?" Wait for user response before proceeding.
    • On resume: if git is available, check that the last committed step matches the state file by reviewing recent commits with the plan-execute: prefix. If they do not match, warn the user that the codebase may have diverged from the recorded state. Skip already-completed steps.
    • On restart: overwrite execution-log.md with a new header. Note the restart in the log: "Restarted execution (previous attempt reached step [X])."
  14. Review supporting files in the [plansFolder]/[selected-plan]/ folder. Classify each file by type and inferred purpose. Present to the user alongside the step list: "Supporting files found: schema.sql (SQL migration), mockup.png (UI reference)." Let the user confirm or clarify how each file should be used during execution.
  15. Parse the plan into discrete, executable steps using this ordering strategy:

    • Independent tasks first: changes with no dependencies on other changes
    • Small to large: within independent tasks, order from smallest to largest scope
    • Dependent tasks after: once all independent tasks are ordered, add tasks that depend on them
    • Same-level tiebreaker: for tasks at the same dependency level, order by logical grouping

    Example: If a plan has "Add utility function", "Create database migration", and "Update API endpoint (uses utility)", order as: 1) Add utility function, 2) Create database migration, 3) Update API endpoint

  16. Use Glob and Grep to estimate which existing files each step is likely to affect. Prefer the affected files the plan already lists, and use Glob to confirm each of those paths exists before presenting it. Present the steps to the user for confirmation, including the dependency graph and file estimates:
    I've parsed your plan into the following steps:
    1. [Step description] - likely affects: src/auth.ts, src/middleware.ts
       (no dependencies)
    2. [Step description] - creates new file: src/utils/hash.ts
       (no dependencies)
    3. [Step description] - likely affects: src/routes.ts
       (depends on step 1)
    ...
    
    Do you want me to proceed with execution? You can reorder or adjust steps before starting.
    Wait for the user to confirm or request changes to the ordering.
  17. Execute each step sequentially:
    • Record the step start time.
    • Before each step, update execution-state.json with current progress including stepStartedAt (see execution-state-format.md).
    • Ask for explicit user permission before high-risk operations:
      • Database migrations or schema changes
      • Deleting files or directories
      • Modifying configuration files
      • External API calls with side effects
      • Any irreversible operations
    • If tests are available (step 12), write the test for this step before writing any implementation code. Run it, show the output, and confirm it fails for the expected reason. If it passes before the implementation exists, the test is wrong: fix the test, not the expectation. Never edit an existing passing test to accommodate this step.
    • Execute the step, ensuring compliance with the project instructions loaded in step 9. Reference critique.md findings when they are relevant to the current step.
    • After the step completes, run verification:
      • If tests are available (step 12), run the suite with the recorded command and show the output verbatim. Do not mark the step COMPLETED until the tests pass. If they fail, treat this as an error and go to the error branch below.
      • If tests are not available, state plainly that the step is unverified by tests and say what evidence you do have, such as the diff or the diagnostics.
      • Use code intelligence on files modified in this step to surface errors and warnings. Report only NEW errors or warnings (compare before and after to avoid flagging pre-existing issues).
      • If new errors are found, inform the user and ask: "Fix now, continue, or stop?"
    • Show a diff summary: list files added, modified, or deleted in this step.
    • Report the outcome with evidence. Cite the test output, the command output, or a file:line reference for every claim about what the step accomplished. Do not describe a step as working on the strength of the code looking correct.
    • If git is available (step 11), offer to commit:
      • On the first step, ask: "Commit this step? (yes / no / yes-to-all)"
      • If the user chose "yes-to-all", commit subsequent steps automatically without asking.
      • Commit message format: plan-execute: [plan-slug] step N - [brief description]
      • Never append a Co-Authored-By or Generated-with trailer to the commit message.
      • Record the commit hash in execution-state.json under gitCommits.
    • Compute step duration and log results to execution-log.md including duration and files changed (see execution-log-format.md).
    • If a step introduces architectural patterns that should be documented in the project instructions, flag this to the user immediately rather than waiting until completion.
    • On error:
      • Save execution state with the failed step.
      • Diagnose the error: read the error output, identify the likely root cause.
      • Include the actual error output verbatim in the execution log (not just a summary).
      • Present recovery options to the user:
        1. Fix and retry - attempt to fix the issue, then re-execute this step.
        2. Skip step - mark as SKIPPED, warn about downstream dependencies, continue.
        3. Rollback step - if git commits are available, revert the last commit. Then stop.
        4. Stop execution - save state, stop. Resume later with /plan-execute.
      • Wait for user choice.
  18. On successful completion:
    • If tests are available (step 12), run the full suite one last time and show the output. Do not declare the plan executed successfully until that run passes. If it fails, report the failure and go to the error branch of step 17 instead.
    • If tests are not available, say so explicitly in the final message rather than implying verification.
    • Update execution log with final summary.
    • Delete execution-state.json.
    • If git was used, mention the commit count: "Plan executed across N commits. Review with git log --oneline -N."
    • Inform user: "Plan executed successfully. Run /plan-archive to archive this plan."

Notes:

  • Never continue past a failed step automatically. Always present recovery options and wait.
  • Keep the execution log updated in real-time.
  • Be explicit about what changes are being made at each step.
  • Reference any supporting files in the plan folder as needed during execution.
  • critique.md is read as supplementary context, not as an authoritative override of plan.md.
  • Git commits enable rollback of individual steps via git revert. This is the primary safety net.
  • Code intelligence checks are advisory. They surface issues early but do not block execution unless the user chooses to stop. Test runs are not advisory: a failing suite blocks COMPLETED.
  • A step is never reported as done, fixed or working on the strength of the code alone. Either the test output backs it, or it is reported as unverified.
  • Plans exceeding 10 steps should be flagged to the user with a recommendation to split into smaller plans to avoid context window exhaustion during execution.
  • The project instructions are applied during execution. If any step introduces patterns that should be documented there, flag this to the user immediately.
  • Execution state is best-effort. If the session ends mid-step, the state file may not reflect the actual codebase state. Git commits provide the definitive record of what was completed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.