client-onboarding-proposal
Skill3 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build a data-backed client onboarding proposal for an agency starting a new engagement, combining an SE Ranking SEO + AI-search audit with a Planable analysis of the client's current social performance. Use this skill whenever an agency wants to show a new (or about-to-sign) client where they stand and what the plan is, or says things like "build an onboarding proposal for [client]", "we're starting with [client], put together the SEO + social analysis", "create a client proposal with audit and social baseline", "scope a SEO + AI + social engagement", or "show the client their opportunities and our plan". Assumes the client's social accounts are already connected in Planable. Always activate for new-engagement proposals that pair SE Ranking analysis with Planable social data.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- seranking/seo-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- seranking/seo-skills★ 201100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-search-gaps-to-social-campaignSkill
- content-calendar-auditSkill
- content-pattern-intelligenceSkill
- cross-client-metrics-overviewSkill
- draft-post-batchSkill
- local-gmb-visibilitySkill
- monthly-performance-summarySkill
- pending-approvals-roundupSkill
- seo-ai-social-reportSkill
- seo-gaps-to-social-campaignSkill
- site-audit-to-social-distributionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
Before doing anything else, verify both MCPs are reachable:
- Very specific: line 30
SE Ranking: call DATA_getSubscription.
- Very specific: line 32
Planable: call list_workspaces. If it fails or returns an auth error, stop immediately and tell the user:
- Distinctive: line 35
Only continue to the process steps below once both calls return a successful response.
- Distinctive: line 56
Read it as a baseline: cadence, engagement rate, platform mix, and the obvious gaps.
- Very specific: line 62
Default to a clean proposal.md in the outputs folder.
- Distinctive: line 77
Don't fabricate metrics. If SE Ranking or Planable returns nulls/empties, mark them unknown rather than guessing.
- Distinctive: line 81
Social section needs connected pages: If the client's pages aren't in the Planable workspace yet, produce the SE Ranking side and clearly …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Client onboarding proposal
Produce the document an agency brings to the start of a client relationship: an honest read of where the client stands across SEO, AI search, and social — and a clear, scoped plan for what the agency will do. It pairs SE Ranking analysis (organic + AI visibility, competitive gaps, site health) with Planable's view of the client's current social performance.
Positioning. This is an onboarding / early-engagement proposal, not a cold pitch. It assumes the client's social pages are already connected in the Planable workspace so their real performance can be analysed. (Without that access, the social section can't be produced from data — only the SE Ranking side.)
Prerequisites
- SE Ranking MCP connected (Data API for research + audit; a project is optional, and an existing finished audit can be reused via
PROJECT_listAuditsinstead of crawling). - Planable MCP connected, with the client's workspace and connected social pages available.
- The user provides: client domain + brand, market/country (default
us), 2–4 competitors, and the Planable workspace. Optionally the engagement goals (e.g. lead gen, brand, local).
Connector health check
Before doing anything else, verify both MCPs are reachable:
- SE Ranking: call
DATA_getSubscription. If it fails or returns an auth error, stop immediately and tell the user:"The SE Ranking connector isn't responding — please reconnect it before we continue. Setup guide: https://seranking.com/api/integrations/mcp/"
- Planable: call
list_workspaces. If it fails or returns an auth error, stop immediately and tell the user:"The Planable connector isn't responding — please reconnect it before we continue. Setup guide: https://help.planable.io/hc/en-us/articles/27538577098780-How-to-connect-Planable-MCP-to-your-AI-tools"
Only continue to the process steps below once both calls return a successful response.
Process
1. Scope the proposal
Confirm the client domain, competitors, the Planable workspace, and what the engagement is meant to achieve. Verify the workspace actually has the client's pages connected (list_pages) and check get_workspace_details for hasAnalytics — this gates the social section.
2. SEO + AI-search analysis (SE Ranking)
- Organic footprint:
DATA_getDomainOverviewWorldwide+DATA_getDomainKeywords— traffic, top terms, trajectory. Highlight striking-distance terms (high volume, position 11–30) — they're the fastest wins. - Competitive gaps:
DATA_getDomainCompetitors+DATA_getDomainKeywordsComparison— what competitors capture that the client doesn't (discard junk/off-brand terms). - Site health: reuse an existing audit (
PROJECT_listAudits→getAuditReport) or runDATA_createStandardAudit→DATA_getAuditReport— health score and the issues holding pages back. - AI visibility:
DATA_getAiSearchBrandto resolve the brand, thenDATA_getAiSearchOverviewandDATA_getAiSearchLeaderboardvs competitors (query the leaderboard narrowly — see the ai-search skill's timeout note). - Demand for content:
DATA_getKeywordQuestions+DATA_getRelatedKeywords— proof there's an audience to win. - Separate findings into quick wins (low effort, near-term) and strategic plays (higher effort, compounding).
3. Social baseline (Planable)
list_pages(workspaceId)— the connected channels.get_page_metrics_summary(workspaceId, pageIds, startDate, endDate)— account-level reach: audience (followers), total page impressions, and engagement rate. This is the size-of-presence number.get_post_metrics_summary(workspaceId, pageIds, startDate, endDate)— published-content performance in the window (impressions/engagement of the posts). These two impression figures are different scopes (page reach vs post reach) — report them separately and don't add or conflate them.get_post_metrics(workspaceId, pageIds, ..., limit: 5)— current top posts (what already resonates).list_posts(workspaceId, ...)— current cadence and how much is actually scheduled vs idle.- Read it as a baseline: cadence, engagement rate, platform mix, and the obvious gaps.
4. Synthesise the proposal
Structure it as: Where you are (SEO health + AI visibility + social baseline, with real numbers) → The opportunity (competitor gaps, AI gaps, under-used channels, content demand) → Our plan (scope across SEO, AI-search optimisation, and social-media management run in Planable) → First 90 days (a concrete, sequenced starter plan) → How we'll measure it (the metrics to revisit). Keep claims tied to the data pulled — this is what makes an onboarding proposal land.
5. Produce the document
Default to a clean proposal.md in the outputs folder. If the user wants a presentation-ready deliverable, build it with the docx skill (formal document) or pptx skill (pitch deck) — read that skill, then format the synthesised content into it.
Output
A client-ready proposal containing:
- Executive summary — the three or four findings that matter most.
- Current state — SEO health, AI-search visibility, and social baseline, with numbers.
- Opportunities — competitor/keyword/AI gaps and social headroom.
- Proposed scope — SEO + AI + SMM, with how Planable runs the social workflow (planning, approvals, publishing).
- First 90 days and measurement plan.
Tips
- Be honest about weak spots — a credible baseline (including unflattering numbers) builds more trust than an inflated one, and it makes future wins measurable.
- Tie every recommendation to a finding. "Competitor X ranks for 240 commercial terms you don't" beats "improve your SEO".
- Don't fabricate metrics. If SE Ranking or Planable returns nulls/empties, mark them unknown rather than guessing.
Edge cases & limits
- Social section needs connected pages. If the client's pages aren't in the Planable workspace yet, produce the SE Ranking side and clearly mark the social baseline as pending access (frame it as an onboarding step).
- Limited page-level analytics: several platforms don't return page-level analytics via the connector — commonly Twitter/X, Pinterest, Threads, and Google Business Profile. They appear under
unsupportedPages; list them as "data not available" rather than zero, and base totals on the supported channels. - Audit needs crawl budget from the plan; reuse a recent audit when one exists, and scope
max_pagesfor large sites. - This skill analyses and proposes; it does not create or publish content (use
seo-gaps-to-social-campaignorsite-audit-to-social-distributiononce the engagement starts).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

