agentleFS
sendaifunsendaifun/solana-new/skills/idea/validate-idea/SKILL.md

validate-idea

Skill178 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run a structured validation sprint on a crypto startup idea. Use when a user says "validate this idea", "is this worth building", "run a validation sprint", "help me test demand", or "should I build this". Reads idea-context.md from a prior idea phase if available.

  • Sends data out

23 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use company-values, find-community and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • insight68Skill

    company-values

    Help define company values and culture for a minimalist business. Use when someone is setting up their company culture, preparing to hire, or wanting to codify what their company stands for.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • insight68Skill

    find-community

    Help identify and evaluate communities to build a minimalist business around. Use when someone is looking for a business idea, trying to find their community, or wondering where to start as an entrepreneur.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • slavingiaSkill

    grow-sustainably

    Evaluate business decisions through the lens of sustainable, profitable growth. Use when someone is making decisions about spending, hiring, fundraising, or scaling their business.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • slavingiaSkill

    processize

    Turn a product idea into a manual-first process you can start delivering today. Use when you have an idea and want to figure out how to deliver value by hand before writing any code.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    launch

    Launch and automate VS Code Insiders with the Copilot Chat extension using @playwright/cli via Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when you need to interact with the VS Code UI, automate the chat panel, test the extension UI, or take screenshots. Triggers include 'automate VS Code', 'interact with chat', 'test the UI', 'take a screenshot', 'launch with debugging'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +4 more from insight68
  • +1 more from slavingia

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 12

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If TEL_PROMPTED is no: Before starting the skill workflow, ask the user about telemetry.

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    If A: run this bash:

    line 36
  3. Distinctive:

    If B: run this bash:

    line 43
  4. Very specific:

    Check for .superstack/idea-context.md in the workspace.

    line 62
  5. Distinctive:

    Read references/validation-framework.md for the sprint structure.

    line 63
  6. Distinctive:

    Run the crypto necessity gut-check: "What breaks if you remove the blockchain?"

    line 65
  7. Distinctive:

    Write a local HTML artifact with the validation report.

    line 68
  8. Distinctive:

    Do not rubber-stamp. If the idea is weak, say so with specifics.

    line 72
  9. Distinctive:

    Every "go" recommendation must cite at least 2 concrete demand signals (not vibes).

    line 73
  10. Distinctive:

    Every "no-go" must include a pivot suggestion, not just rejection.

    line 74
  11. Distinctive:

    If the user has no evidence of demand, the answer is "go validate" with a specific sprint plan, not "go build".

    line 75
  12. Distinctive:

    Always check if there is already a live product doing the same thing on Solana.

    line 76
  13. Distinctive:

    Always write a local HTML artifact.

    line 77
  14. Very specific:

    Write/update .superstack/idea-context.md (create if missing) with a validation field containing:

    line 84
  15. Distinctive:

    Which RPC for testing demand?: Use Helius free tier for any on-chain research.

    line 105
  16. Very specific:

    Hackathon precedents?: If the user wants to check whether similar ideas have been tried in Solana hackathons (and what won/lost), suggest …

    line 107
  17. Very specific:

    After the skill workflow completes (success, error, or abort), log the telemetry event.

    line 119

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Preamble (run first)

_TEL_TIER=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"telemetryTier": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/.*"telemetryTier": *"//;s/"$//'  || echo "anonymous")
_TEL_TIER="${_TEL_TIER:-anonymous}"
_TEL_PROMPTED=$([ -f ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
_TEL_START=$(date +%s)
_SESSION_ID="$$-$(date +%s)"
mkdir -p ~/.superstack
echo "TELEMETRY: $_TEL_TIER"
echo "TEL_PROMPTED: $_TEL_PROMPTED"
if [ "$_TEL_TIER" != "off" ]; then
_TEL_EVENT='{"skill":"validate-idea","phase":"idea","event":"started","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'"}' 
echo "$_TEL_EVENT" >> ~/.superstack/telemetry.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
_CONVEX_URL=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"convexUrl":"[^"]*"' | head -1 | cut -d'"' -f4 || echo "")
[ -n "$_CONVEX_URL" ] && curl -s -X POST "$_CONVEX_URL/api/mutation" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"path":"telemetry:track","args":{"skill":"validate-idea","phase":"idea","status":"success","version":"0.2.0","platform":"'$(uname -s)-$(uname -m)'","timestamp":'$(date +%s)000'}}' >/dev/null 2>&1 &
true
fi

If TEL_PROMPTED is no: Before starting the skill workflow, ask the user about telemetry. Use AskUserQuestion:

Help superstack get better! We track which skills get used and how long they take — no code, no file paths, no PII. Change anytime in ~/.superstack/config.json.

Options:

  • A) Sure, help superstack improve (anonymous)
  • B) No thanks

If A: run this bash:

echo '{"telemetryTier":"anonymous"}' > ~/.superstack/config.json
_TEL_TIER="anonymous"
touch ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted

If B: run this bash:

echo '{"telemetryTier":"off"}' > ~/.superstack/config.json
_TEL_TIER="off"
touch ~/.superstack/.telemetry-prompted

This only happens once. If TEL_PROMPTED is yes, skip this entirely and proceed to the skill workflow.

Wrong skill? See SKILL_ROUTER.md for all available skills.

Validate Idea

Overview

Take an idea (from a prior find-next-crypto-idea session or fresh from the user) and stress-test it with a structured validation sprint. Produce a go/no-go recommendation backed by demand signals, risk analysis, and a concrete next-steps plan.

Workflow

  1. Check for .superstack/idea-context.md in the workspace. If found, load the chosen idea. If not, ask the user to describe their idea.
  2. Read references/validation-framework.md for the sprint structure.
  3. Evaluate demand signals using references/customer-signal-rubric.md.
  4. Run the crypto necessity gut-check: "What breaks if you remove the blockchain?"
  5. Map risks: technical, market, regulatory, team.
  6. Apply references/pivot-or-persist.md to reach a go/no-go decision.
  7. Write a local HTML artifact with the validation report.

Non-Negotiables

  • Do not rubber-stamp. If the idea is weak, say so with specifics.
  • Every "go" recommendation must cite at least 2 concrete demand signals (not vibes).
  • Every "no-go" must include a pivot suggestion, not just rejection.
  • If the user has no evidence of demand, the answer is "go validate" with a specific sprint plan, not "go build".
  • Always check if there is already a live product doing the same thing on Solana.
  • Always write a local HTML artifact. Do not leave results only in chat.
  • Integration-first assessment: As part of validation, identify whether the idea can be built by integrating existing Solana protocols rather than writing a custom program. If integration is viable, note it as an advantage (faster to ship, lower audit costs). If the idea requires novel on-chain logic or the user is building the protocol layer itself, custom development is the right call — don't penalize it. Include the integration-vs-build assessment in next_steps. See data/solana-knowledge/04-protocols-and-sdks.md → "Integrate First, Build Second".

Phase Handoff

This skill is Phase 1 (Idea) in the Idea → Build → Launch journey. After completing validation:

  1. Write/update .superstack/idea-context.md (create if missing) with a validation field containing:
    • demand_signals: array of evidence items
    • risks: array of { category, description, severity }
    • go_no_go: "go" | "no-go" | "pivot"
    • confidence: 0.0 - 1.0
    • next_steps: array of concrete actions
  2. Tell the user they can proceed to the Build phase if the verdict is "go".
  3. See ../../../data/specs/phase-handoff.md for the full JSON contract.

Quick Start

# Just describe your idea and ask for validation:
#   "Validate this idea: a Solana protocol for agent-to-agent payments"
#   "Is this worth building? [describe idea]"
#   "Run a validation sprint on my idea"

Decision Points

  • No idea yet? Redirect to find-next-crypto-idea first.
  • Which RPC for testing demand? Use Helius free tier for any on-chain research.
  • Go vs. no-go threshold: Score ≥ 8/15 across founder-fit + MVP-speed + distribution + market-pull + revenue = Go. Below 6 = strong No-go.
  • Hackathon precedents? If the user wants to check whether similar ideas have been tried in Solana hackathons (and what won/lost), suggest /colosseum-copilot. Requires a free PAT — only mention if the user asks or opts in.

Resources

references/

  • references/validation-framework.md
  • references/customer-signal-rubric.md
  • references/pivot-or-persist.md

Telemetry (run last)

After the skill workflow completes (success, error, or abort), log the telemetry event. Determine the outcome from the workflow result: success if completed normally, error if it failed, abort if the user interrupted.

Run this bash:

_TEL_END=$(date +%s)
_TEL_DUR=$(( _TEL_END - ${_TEL_START:-$_TEL_END} ))
_TEL_TIER=$(cat ~/.superstack/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"telemetryTier": *"[^"]*"' | head -1 | sed 's/.*"telemetryTier": *"//;s/"$//' || echo "anonymous")
if [ "$_TEL_TIER" != "off" ]; then
echo '{"skill":"validate-idea","phase":"idea","event":"completed","outcome":"OUTCOME","duration_s":"'"$_TEL_DUR"'","session":"'"$_SESSION_ID"'","ts":"'$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)'","platform":"'$(uname -s)-$(uname -m)'"}' >> ~/.superstack/telemetry.jsonl 2>/dev/null || true
true
fi

Replace OUTCOME with success/error/abort based on the workflow result.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.