coordinator-mode
Skill4 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Multi-agent orchestration patterns: when to use coordinator mode, worker prompts, parallel execution
6 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- myths-labs/museedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- vudovn/ag-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- vudovn/antigravity-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Aankirz/coordinator-modetheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
- soumatheusgomes/agentvilletheir own version, first seen Aug 13, 2026
- sefaertunc/anthropic-watchedited, first seen Apr 30, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use batch-operations, intelligent-routing and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
goca-seSkillbatch-operations
Apply a change safely across many files — refactors touching more than 5 files, library or API migrations, project-wide renames of symbols/imports/paths, or adding boilerplate to many files. Use when "do it all at once" risks context overflow or silent failures.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SKB3002Skillintelligent-routing
Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillbash-linux
Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillred-team-tactics
Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Dimks777Skillmemory-system
Развёртывание и обслуживание 3-слойной системы памяти для любого агента OpenClaw — чтобы контекст переживал сессии. Активируется на: настрой память, memory setup, проверь память, memory check, почисти память, memory cleanup, память.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from xenitV1
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- myths-labs/muse★ 3814% same
- sefaertunc/anthropic-watch★ 1100% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- soumatheusgomes/agentville★ 9same name
- Aankirz/coordinator-mode★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-routingSkill
- backend-conventionsSkill
- claude-md-maintenanceSkill
- coding-principlesSkill
- context-managementSkill
- frontend-design-systemSkill
- git-conventionsSkill
- memory-architectureSkill
- planning-with-filesSkill
- project-patternsSkill
- prompt-engineeringSkill
- review-and-handoffSkill
- security-checklistSkill
- subagent-usageSkill
- testingSkill
- verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
Use coordinator patterns when:
- Distinctive: line 18
Don't use coordinator patterns when:
- Distinctive: line 37
Read the findings. Identify the approach.
- Distinctive: line 40
Never write "based on your findings" or "based on the research." These phrases delegate understanding to the worker instead of doing it …
- Distinctive: line 50
Commit and report the hash."
- Distinctive: line 78
Read-only tasks (research) — run in parallel freely
- Distinctive: line 79
Write-heavy tasks (implementation) — one at a time per set of files
- Distinctive: line 92
When running multiple Claude Code terminals (Boris Mode):
- Distinctive: line 95
Use /sync on develop after merging to reconcile shared-state files
- Distinctive: line 96
Use /conflict-resolver if merges produce conflicts
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Coordinator Mode
When to Use Multi-Agent Coordination
Use coordinator patterns when:
- A task has independent research + implementation phases
- Multiple file areas can be worked on in parallel
- Verification should run alongside implementation
- You need to synthesize findings before directing follow-up work
Don't use coordinator patterns when:
- The task is small enough for one session
- Steps are strictly sequential with no parallelism
- The overhead of coordination exceeds the work itself
Phase-Based Workflow
Most coordinated tasks follow four phases:
| Phase | Who | Purpose |
| Research | Workers (parallel) | Investigate codebase, find files, understand problem |
| Synthesis | You (coordinator) | Read findings, understand the problem, craft implementation specs |
| Implementation | Workers | Make targeted changes per spec, commit |
| Verification | Workers | Test changes work, try to break them |
The synthesis phase is the coordinator's most important job. When workers report research findings, you must understand them before directing follow-up work. Read the findings. Identify the approach. Then write a prompt that proves you understood by including specific file paths, line numbers, and exactly what to change.
Never write "based on your findings" or "based on the research." These phrases delegate understanding to the worker instead of doing it yourself.
Worker Prompt Best Practices
Workers cannot see your conversation. Every prompt must be self-contained:
Good — synthesized spec: "Fix the null pointer in src/auth/validate.ts:42. The user field is undefined when sessions expire but the token is still cached. Add a null check before user.id access. Commit and report the hash."
Bad — lazy delegation: "Based on your findings, fix the auth bug." "The worker found an issue. Please fix it."
Purpose Statement
Include a brief purpose so workers calibrate depth:
- "This research will inform a PR description — focus on user-facing changes."
- "I need this to plan an implementation — report file paths, line numbers, and type signatures."
- "This is a quick check before we merge — just verify the happy path."
Continue vs Spawn Decision
| Situation | Action | Why |
| Research explored exactly the files that need editing | Continue existing worker | Worker has files in context |
| Research was broad, implementation is narrow | Spawn fresh worker | Avoid context noise |
| Correcting a failure | Continue existing worker | Worker has error context |
| Verifying code a different worker wrote | Spawn fresh worker | Fresh eyes, no implementation bias |
| Wrong approach entirely | Spawn fresh worker | Clean slate avoids anchoring |
Parallel Execution
Parallelism is the primary advantage. Launch independent workers concurrently:
- Read-only tasks (research) — run in parallel freely
- Write-heavy tasks (implementation) — one at a time per set of files
- Verification can sometimes run alongside implementation on different file areas
Scratchpad Pattern
For durable cross-worker knowledge, use a shared scratchpad file:
- Workers write findings to a known location
- Other workers read from it when they need context
- Structure files by topic, not by worker
Multi-Terminal Workflow
When running multiple Claude Code terminals (Boris Mode):
- Each terminal works on a separate feature branch or file area
- Use /sync on develop after merging to reconcile shared-state files
- Use /conflict-resolver if merges produce conflicts
- Shared-state files (PROGRESS.md, SPEC.md, package.json version) are ONLY modified on develop
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

