ouroboros-intent-e2e
Skill3 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run Ouroboros desktop intent-based E2E test plans written in Markdown by driving the Electron app through Agent Browser over Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when asked to execute, debug, or author natural-language desktop QA charters in test-plan/.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-browserSkill
- ai-sdkSkill
- electron-scaffoldSkill
- electronSkill
- grill-meSkill
- ou-features-auditSkill
- ou-full-code-reviewSkill
- ouroboros-test-plan-authorSkill
- prd-to-ticketsSkill
- team-implement-ticketsSkill
- ai-sdkSkill
- grill-meSkill
- meta-thinkingSkill
- ou-full-code-reviewSkill
- prd-to-ticketsSkill
- refactor-agents-mdSkill
- team-implement-ticketsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Use this skill to execute Markdown test plans from test-plan/ against the real Ouroboros Electron desktop app through Agent Browser CDP.
- Distinctive: line 14
Read the assigned Markdown plan completely.
- Distinctive: line 24
Prefer accessible names and snapshot refs.
- Very specific: line 26
Treat all @eN refs as stale after UI changes.
- Distinctive: line 27
Use explicit waits for expected text or UI state.
- Very specific: line 32
Write {OUTPUT_DIR}/report.md and {OUTPUT_DIR}/result.json.
- Distinctive: line 36
Test only the running app.
- Very specific: line 38
If the UI blocks progress, capture the blocked state and return INCONCLUSIVE unless a clear product failure is visible.
- Very specific: line 39
If an expected outcome is contradicted by visible UI state, return FAIL.
- Very specific: line 40
If the plan passes but console/page errors appeared, include them in the report and choose FAIL when they affect user-facing behavior.
- Distinctive: line 44
Write valid JSON with this shape:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ouroboros Intent E2E
Use this skill to execute Markdown test plans from test-plan/ against the real
Ouroboros Electron desktop app through Agent Browser CDP.
Workflow
- Read the assigned Markdown plan completely.
- Load version-matched Agent Browser guidance:
agent-browser skills get coreagent-browser skills get electron
- Connect to the launched app:
agent-browser connect {CDP_PORT}
- Capture initial state:
agent-browser snapshot -iagent-browser screenshot --annotate {OUTPUT_DIR}/initial.png
- Execute each intent step as a user would:
- Prefer accessible names and snapshot refs.
- Re-run
snapshot -iafter every click, navigation, modal, menu, or render-changing action. - Treat all
@eNrefs as stale after UI changes. - Use explicit waits for expected text or UI state.
- Before verdict, capture:
agent-browser consoleagent-browser errors- a final annotated screenshot
- Write
{OUTPUT_DIR}/report.mdand{OUTPUT_DIR}/result.json.
Rules
- Test only the running app. Do not inspect source files while executing the plan.
- Preserve evidence. Do not delete screenshots, videos, logs, or reports.
- If the UI blocks progress, capture the blocked state and return
INCONCLUSIVEunless a clear product failure is visible. - If an expected outcome is contradicted by visible UI state, return
FAIL. - If the plan passes but console/page errors appeared, include them in the report and choose
FAILwhen they affect user-facing behavior.
Result JSON
Write valid JSON with this shape:
{
"verdict": "PASS",
"summary": "Short outcome.",
"checks": [
{
"name": "Onboarding completed",
"status": "PASS",
"evidence": ["after-onboarding.png"]
}
],
"bugs": [],
"artifacts": ["initial.png", "final.png", "report.md"],
"consoleErrors": []
}verdict and each check status must be PASS, FAIL, or INCONCLUSIVE.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

