handoff
Skill1 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Save the current session to .scratch/handoff.md so a later session can pick it up.
191 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ethosagent/ethostheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- glebis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 93 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 87 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 51 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 54 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- huggingface/paperswithcode★ 31514% same
Wrote their own version · 190
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- ykdojo/claude-code-tips★ 10ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
180 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- pickupSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Write
.scratch/handoff.md, or stop at a clean point: When no next steps or in-flight context remain, write no file: the next session … - Distinctive: line 35
Commit backlog and doc changes the way the project commits other work.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
A handoff is a short note from this session to the next one. It holds only session-scoped state and lives until /pickup consumes it. Lasting facts move to their permanent homes, and open work that outlives the next session goes to the backlog.
- Check for an unpicked handoff. If
.scratch/handoff.mdexists, nobody picked it up. Read it and ask the user whether to merge it into this one, overwrite it, or delete it because its work is done..scratch/handoff.prev.mdis the consumed copy from the last/pickup; leave it alone. Done when: the user has chosen, or there was no file. - Promote lasting facts. Go through the session (and any handoff you are merging) for decisions, conventions and gotchas that will still hold after the next session. Pick each one's home: the project's
CLAUDE.mdor docs, the Gotchas of the skill it concerns, or auto-memory for facts about the user or how they work. Show the user every fact in one Markdown table in your message, with the columns#,FactandDestination(the file and, where it helps, the section). Then ask for one approval, and apply the table with any edits they make. Put the table in the message itself and not inside a question tool's options, which can't render one. Skip facts already written down there. Done when: every lasting fact is either in its home or dropped by the user. - Update the backlog. Open items the next session won't finish go to the project's own tracker if it has one, otherwise to
.planning/backlog.md, which is committed. Each entry is a few lines: what, why, and what blocks it. A plan too detailed for a few lines gets its own file in.planning/backlog/<slug>.md, and its entry points to it. Remove entries this session finished, and delete their plan files. Done when: every open item outside the next session's scope is in the backlog, and nothing finished remains there. Write
.scratch/handoff.md, or stop at a clean point. When no next steps or in-flight context remain, write no file: the next session starts from the backlog. Otherwise aim for about 60 lines. Going over means something belongs in step 2 or 3. Cover:- Written: date,
git rev-parse --short HEAD, and the uncommitted files fromgit status --short, with what each change is. - Goal: what the next session works toward and which files it concerns.
- Done: what this session finished, with paths or commits.
- Next: the open steps for the next session, in order, each specific enough to act on.
- Context: in-flight state the files alone don't show, such as half-made choices, questions waiting on the user, or why something was paused.
- Pointers: backlog entries and docs the next session should read.
- Suggested skills: skills the next session should load.
Point to existing material by path or URL; summarize only what lives in the conversation. Redact API keys, passwords and personal information. If the user passed arguments, treat them as the next session's focus and shape Goal and Next around it. Done when: the file is saved and under about 60 lines (or the user accepted the overage), or the session ended at a clean point with no file.
- Written: date,
- Report. Tell the user what was promoted, what changed in the backlog, and either that
/pickupresumes from the handoff or that this is a clean point and/pickupwill offer the backlog.
Gotchas
.scratch/is gitignored, so the handoff exists on one machine only. Everything that must survive goes through steps 2 and 3.- Commit backlog and doc changes the way the project commits other work; leave the handoff itself out of git.
- In a worktree session, read and write
.scratch/in the main checkout (git worktree listnames it first), since the worktree has no.scratch/and/pickuplooks in the main checkout. - Sean's default for an unpicked handoff in step 1 is to merge: keep its contents and add this session's state to it. Don't overwrite it, and skip the question unless its work looks finished.
- In the Claude desktop app, text written before the turn's wrap-up call can be cut down to a short summary, so the step 2 table may never reach the user. Put the table in the closing message, after the wrap-up call, and keep the wrap-up recap and question short.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

