agentleFS
scottcarlsonscottcarlson/skills/skills/productivity/im-dumb/SKILL.md

im-dumb

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Re-explains the previous response — or answers an optional follow-up question — in plain, non-technical, friendly language with emojis. For genuinely large explanations, publishes an easy-to-read HTML artifact instead of a wall of chat text. Invoke as `/im-dumb` or `/im-dumb <question>`.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    No jargon, acronyms, or technical terms without instantly unpacking them in the same breath ("the config — basically its settings file").

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Use emojis to break up the text and pull the eye in — a few per section, placed where they add a visual anchor (✅ for done, ⚠️ for a catch, …

    line 31
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep the fun, conversational energy.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Never address the reader like they're an AI, a developer, or a "user." They're a person.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    Default to answering directly in chat — that covers almost every case.

    line 41
  6. Distinctive:

    When it is met:

    line 48
  7. Distinctive:

    Don't re-open the technical explanation, don't add a "let me know if you want more detail" close, and don't restate what you just said in a …

    line 58

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

I'm Dumb

Why this skill exists, the failure it prevents, and when not to use it: WHY.md.

One job: translate, don't teach. Take whatever was just said (or answer the question given as an argument) and say it again in plain, friendly, non-technical language — the way you'd explain it to a smart friend who doesn't know the jargon and doesn't want a lecture. This skill never talks down and never talks like an AI assistant. It talks like a person.

Process

1. Figure out what you're re-explaining

  • No argument: re-explain your own immediately preceding response in this conversation.
  • Argument given (a question): answer that question instead, using the same conversation context, in the same plain style. Treat it as "explain this to me" — not a new deep-dive.

2. Write it plain

  • No jargon, acronyms, or technical terms without instantly unpacking them in the same breath ("the config — basically its settings file").
  • Short sentences. Everyday words. Imagine explaining it out loud to a friend at a coffee shop, not writing documentation.
  • Use emojis to break up the text and pull the eye in — a few per section, placed where they add a visual anchor (✅ for done, ⚠️ for a catch, 💡 for the key insight), not sprinkled randomly on every line.
  • Keep the fun, conversational energy. Short paragraphs or a tight bulleted list beat a dense block every time.
  • Never address the reader like they're an AI, a developer, or a "user." They're a person. Skip phrases like "as an AI" or "based on the above."

3. Decide chat vs. artifact

Default to answering directly in chat — that covers almost every case.

Reach for an HTML artifact only in the extreme case: the source material is genuinely large (a long response, a multi-part explanation, a big pile of findings) and a designed page would meaningfully help the reader take it in — think a scannable page with headers, cards, or visual grouping, not a markdown dump. If that bar isn't met, just answer in chat.

When it is met:

  1. Load the artifact-design skill before writing the HTML — do not skip this step.
  2. Design the page for plain-language readability: short blocks, generous whitespace, emoji used as visual anchors, a clear scan path.
  3. Publish it and put only a short, plain-language summary in chat (a couple of sentences), with the artifact link for the full read.

4. Stop

Don't re-open the technical explanation, don't add a "let me know if you want more detail" close, and don't restate what you just said in a second register. One plain-language pass is the whole job.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.