agentleFS
Sign inStart free
schwabauerbriantomas-gifschwabauerbriantomas-gif/orchestrator-cube-container/AGENTS.md

orchestrator-cube-container

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter is responsible for: MUST FOLLOW THIS: When performing a git commit or submitting a GitHub PR, the commit message or PR description MUST include the following tag — this is required so that agent contributions remain visible and attributable in the project history: Where: - AGENT_NAME is the name of the AI tool or framework - MODEL_VERSION is the…

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. TencentCloud/CubeSandbox★ 13k100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,700 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    MUST FOLLOW THIS: When performing a git commit or submitting a GitHub PR, the commit message or PR description MUST include the following …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If the work was human-assisted by an AI agent, include:

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    If the commit/PR was fully completed autonomously by an AI agent (without human authoring), include instead:

    line 22

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

AGENTS Policy

AI-Generated Code Policy

AI agents MUST NOT add Signed-off-by tags. Only humans can legally certify the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). The human submitter is responsible for:

  • Reviewing all AI-generated code
  • Ensuring compliance with licensing requirements
  • Adding their own Signed-off-by tag to certify the DCO
  • Taking full responsibility for the contribution

MUST FOLLOW THIS: When performing a git commit or submitting a GitHub PR, the commit message or PR description MUST include the following tag — this is required so that agent contributions remain visible and attributable in the project history:

  • If the work was human-assisted by an AI agent, include:
Assisted-by: AGENT_NAME:MODEL_VERSION
  • If the commit/PR was fully completed autonomously by an AI agent (without human authoring), include instead:
Autonomously-by: AGENT_NAME:MODEL_VERSION

Where:

  • AGENT_NAME is the name of the AI tool or framework
  • MODEL_VERSION is the specific model version used

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free