agentleFS
scchearnscchearn/agent-skills/skills/agent-md-improver/SKILL.md

agent-md-improver

Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Audit and improve agent guidance markdown files in repositories. Use when the user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or related guidance files. Scan for guidance files, evaluate quality against templates, output a quality report, then make targeted updates after approval.

  • Installs packages

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    This skill can write to guidance files: After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or …

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Default update rule: Prefer AGENTS.md for shared, harness-agnostic guidance.

    line 36
  3. Distinctive:

    After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

    line 100
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep it minimal: - Avoid:

    line 111
  5. Distinctive:

    After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool.

    line 141
  6. Distinctive:

    Broken test commands: Test scripts that have changed

    line 153
  7. Distinctive:

    When presenting recommendations, remind users:

    line 158
  8. Distinctive:

    Actionable commands: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready

    line 161
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer AGENTS.md: Use it for shared, harness-agnostic guidance when the repo does not already center on CLAUDE.md

    line 163

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Agent Markdown Improver

Audit, evaluate, and improve agent guidance markdown files across a codebase so future agent sessions have better project context.

This skill can write to guidance files. After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or .claude.local.md with targeted improvements.

Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery

Find all guidance files in the repository:

find . \( -name "AGENTS.md" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" \) 2>/dev/null | head -50

File Types & Locations:

TypeLocationPurpose
Project root./AGENTS.mdPrimary shared project guidance across agent harnesses
Claude-specific./CLAUDE.mdShared Claude-specific guidance when the repo uses it
Local overrides./.claude.local.mdPersonal/local settings (gitignored, not shared)
Package-specific./packages/*/AGENTS.md or ./packages/*/CLAUDE.mdModule-level context in monorepos
SubdirectoryAny nested locationFeature/domain-specific context

Default update rule: Prefer AGENTS.md for shared, harness-agnostic guidance. Update CLAUDE.md when the repo already uses it or the guidance is Claude-specific. Use .claude.local.md only for personal preferences.

Phase 2: Quality Assessment

For each guidance file, evaluate against quality criteria. See references/quality-criteria.md for detailed rubrics.

Quick Assessment Checklist:

CriterionWeightCheck
Commands/workflows documentedHighAre build/test/deploy commands present?
Architecture clarityHighCan an agent understand the codebase structure?
Non-obvious patternsMediumAre gotchas and quirks documented?
ConcisenessMediumNo verbose explanations or obvious info?
CurrencyHighDoes it reflect current codebase state?
ActionabilityHighAre instructions executable, not vague?

Quality Scores:

  • A (90-100): Comprehensive, current, actionable
  • B (70-89): Good coverage, minor gaps
  • C (50-69): Basic info, missing key sections
  • D (30-49): Sparse or outdated
  • F (0-29): Missing or severely outdated

Phase 3: Quality Report Output

ALWAYS output the quality report BEFORE making any updates.

Format:

## Guidance File Quality Report

### Summary
- Files found: X
- Average score: X/100
- Files needing update: X

### File-by-File Assessment

#### 1. ./AGENTS.md (Project Root)
**Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)**

| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Commands/workflows | X/20 | ... |
| Architecture clarity | X/20 | ... |
| Non-obvious patterns | X/15 | ... |
| Conciseness | X/15 | ... |
| Currency | X/15 | ... |
| Actionability | X/15 | ... |

**Issues:**
- [List specific problems]

**Recommended additions:**
- [List what should be added]

#### 2. ./packages/api/CLAUDE.md (Package-specific)
...

Phase 4: Targeted Updates

After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

Update Guidelines (Critical):

  1. Propose targeted additions only - Focus on genuinely useful info:
    • Commands or workflows discovered during analysis
    • Gotchas or non-obvious patterns found in code
    • Package relationships that weren't clear
    • Testing approaches that work
    • Configuration quirks
  2. Keep it minimal - Avoid:
    • Restating what's obvious from the code
    • Generic best practices already covered
    • One-off fixes unlikely to recur
    • Verbose explanations when a one-liner suffices
  3. Show diffs - For each change, show:
    • Which guidance file to update
    • The specific addition (as a diff or quoted block)
    • Brief explanation of why this helps future agent sessions

Diff Format:

### Update: ./AGENTS.md

**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.

```diff
+ ## Quick Start
+
+ ```bash
+ npm install
+ npm run dev  # Start development server on port 3000
+ ```

### Phase 5: Apply Updates

After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.

## Templates

See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md) for guidance file templates by project type.

## Common Issues to Flag

1. **Stale commands**: Build commands that no longer work
2. **Missing dependencies**: Required tools not mentioned
3. **Outdated architecture**: File structure that's changed
4. **Missing environment setup**: Required env vars or config
5. **Broken test commands**: Test scripts that have changed
6. **Undocumented gotchas**: Non-obvious patterns not captured

## User Tips to Share

When presenting recommendations, remind users:

- **Keep it concise**: Guidance files should be human-readable; dense is better than verbose
- **Actionable commands**: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
- **Use `.claude.local.md`**: For personal preferences not shared with team (add to `.gitignore`)
- **Prefer `AGENTS.md`**: Use it for shared, harness-agnostic guidance when the repo does not already center on `CLAUDE.md`

## What Makes a Great Guidance File

**Key principles:**
- Concise and human-readable
- Actionable commands that can be copy-pasted
- Project-specific patterns, not generic advice
- Non-obvious gotchas and warnings

**Recommended sections** (use only what's relevant):
- Commands (build, test, dev, lint)
- Architecture (directory structure)
- Key Files (entry points, config)
- Code Style (project conventions)
- Environment (required vars, setup)
- Testing (commands, patterns)
- Gotchas (quirks, common mistakes)
- Workflow (when to do what)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.