agent-md-improver
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Audit and improve agent guidance markdown files in repositories. Use when the user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or related guidance files. Scan for guidance files, evaluate quality against templates, output a quality report, then make targeted updates after approval.
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- L-yifan/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 28, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- L-yifan/skills★ 5same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- do-agentsSkill
- do-amendSkill
- do-planSkill
- do-researchSkill
- do-startSkill
- do-wiki-addSkill
- do-wiki-alignSkill
- do-wiki-amendSkill
- do-wiki-buildSkill
- do-wiki-learningsSkill
- do-wiki-lintSkill
- do-wiki-querySkill
- do-wiki-reviewSkill
- revise-agent-mdSkill
- setup-obsidian-vaultSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
This skill can write to guidance files: After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or …
- Very specific: line 36
Default update rule: Prefer AGENTS.md for shared, harness-agnostic guidance.
- Distinctive: line 100
After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.
- Distinctive: line 111
Keep it minimal: - Avoid:
- Distinctive: line 141
After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool.
- Distinctive: line 153
Broken test commands: Test scripts that have changed
- Distinctive: line 158
When presenting recommendations, remind users:
- Distinctive: line 161
Actionable commands: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
- Distinctive: line 163
Prefer
AGENTS.md: Use it for shared, harness-agnostic guidance when the repo does not already center on CLAUDE.md
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Agent Markdown Improver
Audit, evaluate, and improve agent guidance markdown files across a codebase so future agent sessions have better project context.
This skill can write to guidance files. After presenting a quality report and getting user approval, it updates AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or .claude.local.md with targeted improvements.
Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery
Find all guidance files in the repository:
find . \( -name "AGENTS.md" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" \) 2>/dev/null | head -50File Types & Locations:
| Type | Location | Purpose |
| Project root | ./AGENTS.md | Primary shared project guidance across agent harnesses |
| Claude-specific | ./CLAUDE.md | Shared Claude-specific guidance when the repo uses it |
| Local overrides | ./.claude.local.md | Personal/local settings (gitignored, not shared) |
| Package-specific | ./packages/*/AGENTS.md or ./packages/*/CLAUDE.md | Module-level context in monorepos |
| Subdirectory | Any nested location | Feature/domain-specific context |
Default update rule: Prefer AGENTS.md for shared, harness-agnostic guidance. Update CLAUDE.md when the repo already uses it or the guidance is Claude-specific. Use .claude.local.md only for personal preferences.
Phase 2: Quality Assessment
For each guidance file, evaluate against quality criteria. See references/quality-criteria.md for detailed rubrics.
Quick Assessment Checklist:
| Criterion | Weight | Check |
| Commands/workflows documented | High | Are build/test/deploy commands present? |
| Architecture clarity | High | Can an agent understand the codebase structure? |
| Non-obvious patterns | Medium | Are gotchas and quirks documented? |
| Conciseness | Medium | No verbose explanations or obvious info? |
| Currency | High | Does it reflect current codebase state? |
| Actionability | High | Are instructions executable, not vague? |
Quality Scores:
- A (90-100): Comprehensive, current, actionable
- B (70-89): Good coverage, minor gaps
- C (50-69): Basic info, missing key sections
- D (30-49): Sparse or outdated
- F (0-29): Missing or severely outdated
Phase 3: Quality Report Output
ALWAYS output the quality report BEFORE making any updates.
Format:
## Guidance File Quality Report
### Summary
- Files found: X
- Average score: X/100
- Files needing update: X
### File-by-File Assessment
#### 1. ./AGENTS.md (Project Root)
**Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)**
| Criterion | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Commands/workflows | X/20 | ... |
| Architecture clarity | X/20 | ... |
| Non-obvious patterns | X/15 | ... |
| Conciseness | X/15 | ... |
| Currency | X/15 | ... |
| Actionability | X/15 | ... |
**Issues:**
- [List specific problems]
**Recommended additions:**
- [List what should be added]
#### 2. ./packages/api/CLAUDE.md (Package-specific)
...Phase 4: Targeted Updates
After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.
Update Guidelines (Critical):
- Propose targeted additions only - Focus on genuinely useful info:
- Commands or workflows discovered during analysis
- Gotchas or non-obvious patterns found in code
- Package relationships that weren't clear
- Testing approaches that work
- Configuration quirks
- Keep it minimal - Avoid:
- Restating what's obvious from the code
- Generic best practices already covered
- One-off fixes unlikely to recur
- Verbose explanations when a one-liner suffices
- Show diffs - For each change, show:
- Which guidance file to update
- The specific addition (as a diff or quoted block)
- Brief explanation of why this helps future agent sessions
Diff Format:
### Update: ./AGENTS.md
**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.
```diff
+ ## Quick Start
+
+ ```bash
+ npm install
+ npm run dev # Start development server on port 3000
+ ```
### Phase 5: Apply Updates
After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.
## Templates
See [references/templates.md](references/templates.md) for guidance file templates by project type.
## Common Issues to Flag
1. **Stale commands**: Build commands that no longer work
2. **Missing dependencies**: Required tools not mentioned
3. **Outdated architecture**: File structure that's changed
4. **Missing environment setup**: Required env vars or config
5. **Broken test commands**: Test scripts that have changed
6. **Undocumented gotchas**: Non-obvious patterns not captured
## User Tips to Share
When presenting recommendations, remind users:
- **Keep it concise**: Guidance files should be human-readable; dense is better than verbose
- **Actionable commands**: All documented commands should be copy-paste ready
- **Use `.claude.local.md`**: For personal preferences not shared with team (add to `.gitignore`)
- **Prefer `AGENTS.md`**: Use it for shared, harness-agnostic guidance when the repo does not already center on `CLAUDE.md`
## What Makes a Great Guidance File
**Key principles:**
- Concise and human-readable
- Actionable commands that can be copy-pasted
- Project-specific patterns, not generic advice
- Non-obvious gotchas and warnings
**Recommended sections** (use only what's relevant):
- Commands (build, test, dev, lint)
- Architecture (directory structure)
- Key Files (entry points, config)
- Code Style (project conventions)
- Environment (required vars, setup)
- Testing (commands, patterns)
- Gotchas (quirks, common mistakes)
- Workflow (when to do what)Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

