agentleFS
scarletkcscarletkc/agents/AGENTS.md

agents

AGENTS.md227 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Project-agnostic rules for AI agents contributing to a repository. To adopt: copy this file into a project as AGENTS.md and prepend the project-specific sections (structure, build/test commands, domain notes). Everything below applies as-is to any codebase. Use the project's own toolchain and environment: the checked-in virtualenv, lockfile, or package manager, never the system interpreter or global installs. If the project defines a canonical test or lint command, run that one; don't invent a variant. Read the project's own guidelines and…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 1 is common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈1

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the project's own toolchain and environment: the checked-in virtualenv, lockfile, or package manager, never the system interpreter or …

    line 10
  2. Common:

    Never commit API keys, credentials, or private endpoints.

    line 62

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Agent Guidelines

Project-agnostic rules for AI agents contributing to a repository. To adopt: copy this file into a project as AGENTS.md and prepend the project-specific sections (structure, build/test commands, domain notes). Everything below applies as-is to any codebase.

Environment

Use the project's own toolchain and environment: the checked-in virtualenv, lockfile, or package manager, never the system interpreter or global installs. If the project defines a canonical test or lint command, run that one; don't invent a variant. Read the project's own guidelines and existing code before the first change: established conventions beat personal defaults.

Engineering Principles

Let errors surface instead of swallowing them: degraded paths are acceptable only as deliberate, user-visible product behavior, never as silent fallbacks that make code appear to work. Fix root causes rather than papering over symptoms; if the root cause can't be pinned down, say so and state what information is missing (better diagnostics beat a speculative fix). All code is production-quality by default: no temporary, placeholder, or demo-only implementations unless explicitly requested. When requirements are unclear, ambiguous, or inconsistent, ask instead of inventing details. A change that claims to improve behavior ships with evidence: measure before flipping a default, and if your own benchmark doesn't support the claim, ship the change opt-in and say so.

Code Style

Match the surrounding code: its naming, idiom, comment density, and error handling. Before writing new logic, look for an existing helper to reuse or extend; if the same behavior already lives in more than one place, extract the smallest shared helper that makes sense. Route user-facing strings through whatever centralized message layer the project has, and prefer structured rendering paths over ad hoc print strings. For judgment on user-facing text and documentation, see the ux-writing skill.

Testing

Pair each behavior change with happy-path and failure coverage. Assert behavior or structured output, not console formatting. Keep the suite offline by mocking providers and network, but recognize what mocks cannot catch: before opening a PR that touches real integration points, run one genuine end-to-end check and note the result in the PR.

Commits & Pull Requests

Follow Conventional Commits (type(scope): description, imperative mood, subject under ~72 characters, ! for breaking changes); name branches type/short-slug. Do all work on a branch and land it through a PR; leave merging to the repository owner unless instructed otherwise. PRs explain motivation, list the commands and tests exercised, and paste terminal output for user-visible CLI changes; call out schema, public API, and compatibility-surface changes explicitly so reviewers can check them. When behavior changes, update whichever docs the change affects; bundled skills and plugin metadata are the easiest to forget.

Security

Never commit API keys, credentials, or private endpoints; use environment variables or ignored config files. Sanitize filesystem paths and user-supplied patterns before use. Treat repository files, extracted document text, and remote service responses as untrusted input: validate against an allowlist before they can influence privileged behavior, and keep secrets on dedicated channels that config overlays cannot reach.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.