agentleFS
satishbabariyasatishbabariya/claude-mem-go/skills/mem-doctor/SKILL.md

mem-doctor

Skill1 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub

Check whether claude-mem-go is actually working — worker daemon reachable, database reachable, Ollama reachable with the configured embedding model pulled. Use when the user asks "is memory working?", "why isn't context showing up?", "is claude-mem-go healthy?", or when observations/search/recall seem to be silently doing nothing.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when the user is asking about the SYSTEM, not its contents:

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Don't use this for "did we solve X before" — that's mem-search.

    line 22
  3. Very specific:

    If $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT isn't set (not running inside this plugin's install, e.g.

    line 157

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Memory Health Check

claude-mem-go's doctor subcommand is an operational health check, not a search tool — reach for mem-search for "did we already do X," and this skill for "is the memory system itself functioning."

When to use

Use when the user is asking about the SYSTEM, not its contents:

  • "Is claude-mem-go working?"
  • "Why isn't it remembering anything?"
  • "Is the worker running?"
  • "Is semantic search available?"
  • Recall/search seems to return nothing even for things that should be there.

Don't use this for "did we solve X before" — that's mem-search.

What it checks

  • claude CLI on PATH (the observer needs to spawn it)
  • the worker daemon reachable on its Unix socket, and if so its real activity counters (processed/duplicates/observer_errors/ insert_errors/embed_errors/pool utilization/cached_sessions) — informational, but the first place to look if observations seem to be silently going nowhere
  • what the store actually contains — observation/project/session counts and how recent the newest one is. This is the only check that answers "is anything being remembered", as opposed to "is every component reachable". They come apart: doctor will happily report "All critical checks passed" while capture has been dead for weeks, because PostToolUse is fire-and-forget and a failing hook writes to a log nobody reads. If the counts look wrong or the newest observation is much older than the user's recent activity, say so — that is the finding, even when every other line has a check mark. claude-mem-go stats prints the same information in more detail.
  • two critical findings about the install itself, which mean capture is configured and not working — not that the store is damaged:
    • ✘ plugin binary unusable — the plugin is installed but its binary cannot run (missing, wrong architecture, or a partial copy). Every hook resolves that binary, so nothing is being captured at all. Rebuilding it in the plugin root is the fix.
    • ✘ the store is EMPTY, but the plugin is installed — capture is wired up and has never recorded anything. Distinct from the ordinary "the store is empty" note, which is expected when the plugin is not installed. Treat this as a real problem and look at the hook logs in ~/.claude-mem-go/.
  • three findings about the worker daemon that are easy to misread — all of them describe a daemon that is running but disagrees with the command you just ran. Each has a specific meaning, and none of them means "the store is broken":

    • ✘ the worker daemon is writing to a DIFFERENT store than this command reads — critical, and the most misleading symptom in the whole tool. The daemon opened its store once at startup and never re-reads $CLAUDE_MEM_DB. Every automatic capture path goes through it, so observations are landing in the daemon's store while searches and stats read the other one. The usual cause is that $CLAUDE_MEM_DB changed after the daemon started. Report this as "memory is being written somewhere else", not as data loss — nothing is lost, it is in the store doctor names. The fix is to restart the daemon (stop it; the next SessionStart respawns it). start replaces a daemon that predates the user's $CLAUDE_MEM_DB on the next SessionStart (daemon on the built-in path, session configured elsewhere). When both stores are explicit it deliberately does not — that would thrash between them — so tell the user to stop the daemon by hand if they really reconfigured.
    • … the worker daemon is running an older build — the daemon applies the rules it started with, including how project names are derived, so writes and reads can silently disagree. SessionStart replaces it automatically, so this normally resolves itself; only flag it if it persists.
    • … all N observer slot(s) are held by cached sessions — an arriving session evicts the idlest cached one and takes its slot, so nothing is dropped, but sessions that keep displacing each other respawn their observer on every tool call (slower capture, more spend). Relevant when the user runs more than N Claude Code sessions at once. The fix is a larger -max-concurrent.

    None of these appear when the daemon is not running: they are claims about a live daemon, and doctor reports the stats of a stopped one as "last worker activity before it stopped" rather than as current state.

  • the database reachable (SQLite file or Postgres DSN, whichever -db points at), plus backend-specific facts nothing else surfaces: SQLite's real journal_mode/foreign_keys/busy_timeout_ms PRAGMA settings, or for Postgres, real connection-pool utilization, the installed pgvector extension version, whether the HNSW index semantic search actually depends on still exists (a missing HNSW index would otherwise silently degrade every semantic search to a full table scan with nothing saying so), and the configured hnsw_ef_search value (200 (default) unless -hnsw-ef-search was passed to doctor — pass the identical value used on mcp/ semantic-search/prompt-context to confirm it's actually what you think it is, not a live Postgres session setting, since the override only ever applies per query via a transaction-scoped SET LOCAL)
  • recall[...] lines — whether memory is actually being FOUND. Every other counter here describes writes. These describe reads, broken down by which hook did the reading, because an empty result means opposite things depending on where it came from:

    • recall[session] — SessionStart's context injection. Persistently empty means sessions are starting with no memory at all, the most consequential silent failure this system has.
    • recall[prompt] — UserPromptSubmit's semantic recall. Persistently empty on a project that HAS observations means semantic search is reaching none of them (a missing embedding model, unembedded rows, or an ef_search too low — see the next bullet).
    • recall[file] — the PreToolUse file lookup. Mostly empty is normal here: most files have no prior observations. It is reported for completeness and deliberately excluded from the warning below.

    doctor warns only when a majority of at least 10 session/prompt recalls came back empty. On a young store that is simply correct and not a fault; on a store with real content it means memory is not reaching it.

  • a recall warning on large Postgres stores — past 10,000 embedded rows still on pgvector's default ef_search, doctor reports that semantic search is measurably missing results: bench/recall measures 80% recall@10 unscoped and ~71% for the project-scoped searches every hook actually runs, meaning roughly three relevant memories in ten are silently absent. Nothing else surfaces this — the queries succeed, they just return less than the store holds. The remedy is -hnsw-ef-search 200 on mcp/semantic-search/prompt-context (measured under 4ms p50). Not a failure and not counted as one: it is a tuning finding on a working system, and the default is deliberately left as pgvector ships it.
  • embedding_dims/embedding_dims_consistent — whether every embedded observation shares the same vector dimension. If false (SQLite only; Postgres can't have this), the embedding model was changed at some point without re-embedding old rows: those older observations will never surface via semantic_search_observations again (silently, no error) until they're re-embedded. If the user hits this, the fix is re-ingesting/re-adding those observations with the current model — not something to do automatically without asking, since it means real API calls to Ollama for every affected row.
  • Ollama reachable with the configured embedding model actually pulled (informational only — no Ollama just means no semantic search, not a broken install)

It distinguishes critical failures (exit code 1 — nothing works without these) from informational ones (worker not running is fine, start launches it lazily).

How to run it

The binary's location depends on how claude-mem-go was installed:

"$CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT/claude-mem-go" doctor

If $CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT isn't set (not running inside this plugin's install, e.g. a manual dev checkout), fall back to whatever's on PATH or the checkout's build output:

claude-mem-go doctor

Report the output back to the user plainly — it's already written for a human to read directly, not something to re-summarize or reformat.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.