agentleFS
sandraschisandraschi/arxiv-mcp/CLAUDE.md

arxiv-mcp

CLAUDE.md4 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub

**Before any task in this fleet, read mcp-central-docs/standards/AGENTREADINGORDER.md.** It carries the AGENTS.md chain, the 13-file Primary Read List, the domain read list, the pitfalls docs and the bug depot. There are 124 files under standards/; that file is the index that makes them usable. Search mcp-central-docs/troubleshooting/BUGS_DEPOT.md by symptom before debugging anything — a bug the fleet has already paid for is a lookup, not an investigation. These few are repeated here rather than linked, because a rule whose violation produces…

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Search mcp-central-docs/troubleshooting/BUGS_DEPOT.md by symptom *before* debugging anything — a bug the fleet has already paid for is a …

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 25,680 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

arxiv-mcp — Claude Code Guide

Overview

FastMCP 3.2.0 arXiv research server with experimental HTML extraction and web dashboard

Entry Points

  • uv run arxiv-mcp → arxiv_mcp.__main__:main

Standards

  • FastMCP 3.2+ portmanteau tool pattern — tools use operation enum param
  • Responses: structured dicts with success, message, domain-specific fields
  • Dual transport: stdio (Claude Desktop) + HTTP (MCP_TRANSPORT=http)
  • See mcp-central-docs for fleet-wide coding standards

Key Files

  • README.md — full documentation
  • pyproject.toml — build config and entry points
  • AGENTS.md — OpenAI Codex agent context (if present)
<!-- FLEET-CONTEXT:BEGIN (generated by fleet-gate/agent_context.py) -->

Fleet context — required reading

Before any task in this fleet, read mcp-central-docs/standards/AGENT_READING_ORDER.md. It carries the AGENTS.md chain, the 13-file Primary Read List, the domain read list, the pitfalls docs and the bug depot. There are 124 files under standards/; that file is the index that makes them usable.

Search mcp-central-docs/troubleshooting/BUGS_DEPOT.md by symptom before debugging anything — a bug the fleet has already paid for is a lookup, not an investigation.

These few are repeated here rather than linked, because a rule whose violation produces no error cannot depend on anyone following a link:

  • Never author multi-line file content with a Bash heredoc (cat > file <<'EOF') — it intermittently writes nothing on this Windows/Git-Bash setup. Use the Write tool. (BUG-031)
  • Never patch files with inline Python (python - <<'PY', python -c) — Python's string parser silently converts backslash escapes, so "D:\Dev\repos\x" becomes D: + \D + ev + CR + epos + CR + x. One observed case deleted dict entries while staying valid Python with a clean lint. Use Edit and Write. (BUG-039)
  • Never hardcode a port. Claim one with mcp-central-docs/fleet-gate/claim_ports.py, which checks operations/WEBAPP_PORTS.md and every fleet-start.config.ps1.
  • Max 5 files per commit and per script invocation; 3+ file edits need a timestamped .bak per file written first.
  • Never restart an NSSM service by killing its child — sc.exe stop/start, then verify a NEW PID owns the port.
  • Never invent a date or location; read the clock or write UNKNOWN-DATE.
  • Prove changes by running them. A gate that reports success having examined nothing is this fleet's most common failure mode.
<!-- FLEET-CONTEXT:END -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.