to-doc
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn the current conversation into an experiment doc (hypothesis, premises, baseline, success metrics, experiment stories) and publish it to the project docs, with no new interview. Use after /hypothesys, or when the user says 'write the experiment doc', 'document this experiment' or 'turn this into a doc'.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- helderberto/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sponge-b0b/Polaristheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- helderberto/agent-skills★ 19same name
- sponge-b0b/Polaris★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- critic-reviewSkill
- developing-data-science-notebooksSkill
- expectation-driven-scienceSkill
- experiment-graphSkill
- experiment-pipelineSkill
- exp-reviewSkill
- hypothesysSkill
- let-it-ripSkill
- literature-researchSkill
- mad-science-setupSkill
- notify-gchat-human-waitSkill
- to-articleSkill
- what-i-doSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.
- Distinctive: line 70
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
This skill takes the current conversation context and codebase understanding and produces documentation. Do NOT interview the user; just synthesize what you already know.
Process
1- Explore the repo to understand the current state of the codebase, if you haven't already. Use the project's domain glossary vocabulary throughout the docs.
2- Sketch out the validation checkpoints at which you're going to evaluate the experiment. Existing pipeline splits and validation metrics should be preferred to new ones. Evaluate at the highest level possible (e.g., end-to-end model performance or business metrics). If new checkpoints are needed, propose them at the highest point you can in the pipeline. The fewer disjointed evaluation scripts across the workflow, the better - the ideal number is one unified evaluation step.
Check with the user that these seams match their expectations.
3- Write the doc using the template below, then publish it to the project documentation.
Hypothesis
The hypothesis that the user is facing, from the user's or business's perspective.
Premises
The premises to the problem and the underlying assumptions, from the user's perspective.
Baseline & Current State
What the experiment is trying to beat. Describe the current environment, whether it is an existing model, a manual human process, or hardcoded business rules (e.g., "if score > 50, approve").
Success Metrics & Goals
The exact definition of how success will be measured. This should be divided into:
- Offline Metrics: Model evaluation metrics during training (e.g., RMSE, F1-Score, Precision, Recall).
- Online/Business Metrics: Business impact metrics when the model is in production (e.g., Conversion rate, LTV, Churn reduction).
Experiment Stories
A LONG, numbered list of user experiments or testable hypotheses. Each story should be in the format of:
As a [role], I want a [feature/test], so that [outcome]
As a Data Scientist, I want to test the inclusion of geolocation features, so that I can see if it increases the F1-Score by 5%. As a mobile bank customer, I want to see a spending forecast, so that I can make better-informed decisions about my budget.
This list of experiment stories should be extremely extensive and cover all aspects of the problem and modeling iterations.
Data Sources & Target Definition
Data Sources: Where the data comes from (specific databases, tables, external APIs, or data lakes).
Target Definition: The exact mathematical or logical definition of the target variable (e.g., "Churn = customer has not made a transaction in the last 30 days").
Validation Strategy
How the data will be split and evaluated to prevent data leakage and simulate real-world performance fairly. Detail the data splits (Train/Validation/Test), validation methods (e.g., Out-of-Time split, K-Fold Cross-validation), and the specific pipeline checkpoints used for evaluation.
Implementation Decisions
A list of implementation decisions that were made regarding both software engineering and data science. This can include:
- Algorithm selections and feature engineering techniques.
- The modules that will be built/modified.
- The interfaces of those modules that will be modified.
- Technical clarifications from the developer/data engineer.
- Architectural decisions.
- Specific interactions.
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly. Exception: If a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it within the relevant decision and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts, not a working demo, just the important bits.
Risks, Constraints & Caveats
The limitations of the experiment and system constraints. This includes latency requirements (e.g., model must respond in < 100ms), potential data bias, computational limits, and privacy/compliance concerns (e.g., GDPR/LGPD restrictions).
Further Notes
Any further notes, context, or references about the experiment.
Confirm the doc with the user before save. When user confirms save the file on docs folder with this pattern name: docs/experiments-doc/<today_date>_<hypothesis>.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

