wdyt
Skill17 starsChanged 47 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Give a real, opinionated verdict on an idea, feature, or approach the user just described — not a reflection, not a checklist. Triggers on "WDYT", "what do you think", "what do you think about this idea", or when the user runs an idea past Claude in parallel with (or right after) asking for something to be built. Delivers: the accurate/correct way to think about it, the best possible way to do it, what's missing, a quick steelman of the opposing view with a real rebuttal or concession, and evidence for why it'll work or fail. Corrects the user directly if their framing or approach is off. Depth scales to the size of the thing — a small tweak gets a few sentences, a big feature gets more, but never a deep dive. Distinct from jamming (which withholds verdicts) and senior-engineer-brainstorm (which produces full implementation plans) — WDYT's whole point is to actually answer the question.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- as-sher/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- RichardBray/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- RichardBray/skills★ 5same name
- as-sher/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-paper-readerSkill
- alignSkill
- askSkill
- blueprintSkill
- cavemanSkill
- checkSkill
- claude-cliSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- codex-cliSkill
- cog-replicateSkill
- colab-cliSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- execute-processSkill
- executeSkill
- interface-designSkill
- jammingSkill
- log-papercutsSkill
- opencode-cliSkill
- opencode-fusionSkill
- planSkill
- quick-decisionSkill
- reddit-post-builderSkill
- seedance-prompt-enSkill
- senior-engineer-brainstormSkill
- simple-writingSkill
- skill-ceo-reviewSkill
- slack-notifySkill
- sleep-on-doneSkill
- steve-jobs-thinkingSkill
- TerminalSkill
- the-razorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.