profile-bio
Skill0 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Fills in GitHub account profile fields (name, bio, company, location, blog, social accounts) through the GitHub API, asking for every missing value instead of inventing one and confirming before any write. Use when the user wants to complete or update their GitHub profile details.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- gh-auditSkill
- gh-normalizeSkill
- gh-onboardSkill
- profile-readmeSkill
- readme-standardSkill
- release-workflowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Run only when the user explicitly asks.
- Very specific: line 24
If not logged in or the scope is missing, ask the user to run gh auth refresh -s user (or gh auth login -s user) and wait.
- Very specific: line 43
Never guess any value, including company and location.
- Distinctive: line 63
Never invent values; a skipped field stays empty.
- Distinctive: line 64
Every write needs explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 65
Never delete existing social accounts unless the user asks.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
profile-bio
Fills in GitHub account fields (PATCH /user and social accounts) interactively. Never invents a
value; asks for what is missing. Writes only after approval.
Run only when the user explicitly asks.
0. Preflight
The user scope is required for writes.
gh auth status 2>&1 | grep -i "token scopes" # must list 'user'If not logged in or the scope is missing, ask the user to run
gh auth refresh -s user (or gh auth login -s user) and wait.
1. Read the current state
gh api user --jq '{login,name,bio,company,location,blog,twitter_username,hireable}'
gh api /user/social_accounts --jq '[.[]|{provider,url}]'2. Evaluate
Standard: references/profile-bio.md. List empty and weak fields (recommended: name, bio ≤ 160, blog, ≥ 1 social account; optional: location, company).
3. Ask for missing values
- Recommended field empty → ask the user and wait for an explicit answer.
- Optional field empty → ask once whether they want to fill it; empty is fine.
- Never guess any value, including
companyandlocation. - Fields the API can't set (pronouns, PRO badge, local time, pins, avatar) → list them as manual steps; don't touch them.
4. Diff and approval
Show current → new for every field that changes. Don't write before an explicit yes.
5. Apply
Send only the changed fields. Pass values as separate -f arguments.
gh api -X PATCH /user -f name="$name" -f bio="$bio" -f blog="$blog"
gh api -X POST /user/social_accounts -f "account_urls[]=$url"
gh api -X DELETE /user/social_accounts -f "account_urls[]=$url" # only when the user asksRules
- Never invent values; a skipped field stays empty.
- Every write needs explicit approval; never send unchanged fields.
- Never delete existing social accounts unless the user asks.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

