pull-request
Skill359 starsChanged 18 days agoMITView on GitHub
Branches, commits, pushes, opens, updates, and merges ttsc pull requests. Use only when the user asks for one of those actions or a mandate names delivery.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Write the body once: intent, scope, deferred items, local verification, and skipped checks.
- Distinctive: line 15
Never bump versions, tag, or publish.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pull Request
Pushing, opening, and merging each need the user's request or a mandate that names them.
- Branch
<type>/<scope>frommasterin the current checkout. Never commit tomasteror use another clone or worktree, and stage only your own paths. - Commit as
<type>(<scope>): <imperative lowercase subject>. - Write the body once: intent, scope, deferred items, local verification, and skipped checks. Record later fixes and Self-Review rounds as
COMMENTreviews, with line findings inline, never as ordinary comments,APPROVE, orREQUEST_CHANGES. - Push a correction only after every check of the current head has settled, because a push cancels the running checks.
- Squash-merge once required checks are green on the exact head, plus a clean Overall Self-Review on it for an issue campaign. Under a delivery mandate, merge without asking.
nestia.ymlis not a merge gate. Report a branch-protection block instead of bypassing it. - Never bump versions, tag, or publish; releases belong to the maintainer.
Other versions47 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 47
- samchon/typia★ 5.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- werf/werf★ 4.7ksame name
- basicmachines-co/basic-memory★ 4.3ksame name
- PaulWoitaschek/Voice★ 3.2ksame name
- heyitsnoah/claudesidian★ 2.6ksame name
- samchon/nestia★ 2.2ksame name
- theopenco/llmgateway★ 1.7ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
37 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use testing, prototype and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
NVIDIASkilltesting
Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.
Also in 6 projects that use this
GoogleSkillprototype
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilladversarial-review
Adversarial review of a system design from 6 critical perspectives -- SRE, security, staff engineer, finance, operator, and developer advocate. Produces a unified risk assessment. Use for INTERACTIVE on-demand reviews during a design conversation (/adversarial-review). For RECIPE-DRIVEN reviews (where prior step context is needed), use the systems-design-critic agent instead.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillwayfinder
Plan a huge chunk of work — more than one agent session can hold — as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillgit-commit
Use this skill when the user wants to make a Git commit or split changes into more than one commit. Also use it when the user types "/commit" or asks for a conventional commit. The skill examines the diff, stages the related files, writes a Conventional Commits message, and runs git commit. Do not use it when the user wants only a commit message and no commit. Do not use it to push, open a pull request, rebase, or change the commit history.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilldiagnose
Use to systematically diagnose why scenarios fail — identifies root causes by analyzing agent traces, codebase, and behavioral patterns
Also in 3 projects that use this
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- benchmarkSkill
- contractsSkill
- developmentSkill
- documentationSkill
- issue-campaignSkill
- promptingSkill
- reviewSkill
- typescript-go-syncSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

