create-agent
Skill0 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a DialogBrain AI agent that answers customers on connected channels — from a business description to a working agent with a knowledge base, instructions, tone, a trigger, and a reply verified against the facts. Use when someone asks for an assistant, a bot, an auto-reply, an agent, or "something that answers my customers".
38 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lalulali/vespyrtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- cognitedata/builder-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- harness/harness-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- fxmartin/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- agno-agi/agentos-dockertheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- agno-agi/agentos-flytheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use deploy-platform, setup-platform and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
agno-agiSkilldeploy-platform
Deploy this AgentOS using its own provider instructions, configure JWT verification, and verify the public service. Use for first deployment, redeployment, or production configuration changes.
Also in 5 projects that use this
agno-agiSkillsetup-platform
Set up this AgentOS from a fresh clone — confirm Docker, configure .env, boot the containers, prove the MCP endpoint live, connect the AgentOS UI, then build the user's first agent. Use when the user asks to set up the platform, get started, or bring this repo up on a new machine.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ElasticSkillcreate-integration
Use when creating a new Elastic integration package, scaffolding data streams, answering package layout or structure questions, or running the end-to-end integration build workflow. Covers package topology, scaffold commands, post-scaffold edits, and full orchestration of CEL/pipeline/test subagents.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcreate-hook
Create a hook (.json) to enforce policy or automate agent lifecycle events.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AnasX7Skillimprove
Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ElasticSkillcreate-skill
Interactively create a new Claude Code skill and add it to the elastic-docs-skills catalog. Use when the user wants to generate a new skill, scaffold a slash command, or build automation for docs tasks.
Also in 13 projects that use this
- +3 more from agno-agi
Other versions38 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 38
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- gnekt/My-Brain-Is-Full-Crew★ 3.9ksame name
- EvolutionAPI/evo-nexus★ 545same name
- evolution-foundation/evo-nexus★ 535same name
- openma-ai/open-managed-agents★ 348same name
- luanmorenommaciel/agentspec★ 256same name
- harness/harness-skills★ 127same name
- microsoft/copilot-studio-plugin★ 82same name
- Azure-Samples/art-voice-agent-accelerator★ 74same name
- TOKTOKHAN-DEV/agent-company★ 74same name
28 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- connect-channelSkill
- first-messageSkill
- lead-reportSkill
- react-to-eventsSkill
- setup-livechat-widgetSkill
- tasks-boardSkill
- voice-agentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 35 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 81
Do not write the prompt in the second person about the agent ("you are a helpful assistant").
- Very specific: line 83
Do not switch send_mode to "auto" without being told.
- Distinctive: line 84
Do not put example data from one business into another's prompt.
- Very specific: line 85
Do not pass ids you have not seen in this workspace — a file_id or thread_id copied from a tool description matches nothing, the search …
- Very specific: line 88
Do not simulate with send_mode "auto" on any thread other than the one create_new_livechat returned: a real person's thread gets the reply.
- Distinctive: line 90
Do not call the agent finished on a reply that merely sounds right.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 35 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create an agent that answers customers
Steps
- Collect, in one message: what the business does, who writes in and about what, the tone (formal / friendly), the languages, what the agent must NOT do (prices it may not quote, promises it may not make), and when a human takes over. Do not start until you have the "must not" list.
- Check the channels: the agent answers wherever its trigger fires, so
the channel must be connected first (
connect-channelskill).agents.list(status"active") shows what already exists. - Build the knowledge base before the agent. An agent with nothing to
read answers from the model's imagination. If the facts live on a
website, fetch its pages (the sitemap, then each public page), keep the
main text of each, and put them into ONE markdown file with a heading
per page and its URL. Upload it:
files.upload(contentbase64,filename,mime_type"text/markdown") up to about 50 KB, otherwisefiles.create_upload_url→ PUT →files.complete_upload. Thencollections.create(name),collections.add_file(collection_id,file_id). Documents the person hands you go in the same way. Indexing runs in the background: pollcollections.list_files(collection_id) until every file showsstatus"ready"and achunk_countabove zero before anything is tested — an agent asked too early answers from an empty index, which looks exactly like a broken setup. Say what got indexed and what did not. - Create with
agents.create:name,description,prompt_textwritten FROM the business TO the customer in the collected tone. Put the "must not" list and the hand-over rule in the prompt as explicit sentences.send_mode"draft"so a person approves each reply for the first days ("auto"only when the person says so).allowed_tools["knowledge.query"]at minimum. A new agent starts with NO tools; without this it cannot read the knowledge base and imitates the search in its reply text instead.model: pick one with native tool calling,"gpt-4.1-mini"unless the person names another. The platform default has been seen printing raw tool-call markup into replies, and Anthropic models fail with "AI service authentication failed" in a workspace that has no key for them. If the first test fails that way, switch the model withagents.updaterather than rewriting the prompt.- The hand-over rule is words in the reply ("a person will get back to
you, how can we reach you?"), not a tool: with this allow-list the
agent has no
agent.handofforjob.escalate, and it does not need them while replies are drafts a person reads anyway. - A
templateis a starting point only if the person named one. Thencollections.assign_agent(collection_id,agent_id).
- Add the trigger with
agents.trigger_create:agent_id,trigger_type"incoming_message",send_mode"draft", andconditionsonly if the person wants a subset — for a website chat,{"channel_types": ["livechat"]}. - Test against the facts, not the tone. Take three concrete facts out
of the knowledge base (a time, a price, a count, a name) and ask for them
with
agents.simulate_inbound: the first call withcreate_new_livechattrue, every later call with thethread_idthat first call returned, so the run leaves ONE test thread, not five. On that thread, and only there, usesend_mode"auto"so each reply is persisted instead of being overwritten by the next draft:"auto"delivers through the real channel, so a thread that belongs to a real person would receive the test reply. The agent's ownsend_modestays"draft"; the simulation overrides it for these runs only. Add one message that must trigger the hand-over wording and one that pokes a "must not". Thenagents.traces_list(agent_id,limit1) andagents.trace_get(trace_id,fulltrue) for each: the reply must quote the fact as the document has it, and the trace must show aknowledge.querycall with no inventedfile_ids. "I'm not sure", a figure that is not in the document, or a tool call typed out as text all mean the setup is broken, not the prompt — check the model, the allowed tools and the collection before touching the wording. Show the person the replies and the facts side by side, and tell them the test thread is theirs to delete. - Say what happens next: replies land as drafts in the inbox until
send_modeis switched; escalations go to a person; new pages on the site are not picked up until the file is re-uploaded.
Do not
- Do not write the prompt in the second person about the agent ("you are a helpful assistant"). Write what the business says to its customers.
- Do not switch
send_modeto"auto"without being told. - Do not put example data from one business into another's prompt.
- Do not pass ids you have not seen in this workspace — a
file_idorthread_idcopied from a tool description matches nothing, the search comes back empty, and the agent starts guessing. - Do not simulate with
send_mode"auto"on any thread other than the onecreate_new_livechatreturned: a real person's thread gets the reply. - Do not call the agent finished on a reply that merely sounds right.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

