ai-first-engineering
Skill2 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Decomposes ambiguous software requirements into deterministic milestones, executable acceptance criteria, and test-backed delivery pipelines for AI agent development.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- renepf/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecctheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272same name
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 61same name
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 8same name
- ronmkr/PromptBook★ 2same name
- get-proofpilot/claude-skills-catalog★ 1same name
- junimnjw/everything-claude-code★ 1same name
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 1same name
- Rojios/everything-claude-code★ 1same name
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1same name
- TironFox/everything-claude-code★ 1same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository108 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- everything-gemini-maintainerSkill
- adversarial-fuzz-generatorSkill
- agent-evalsSkill
- alloydb-omni-vectorSkill
- apache-kafka-streamsSkill
- api-craftsmanSkill
- architecture-designerSkill
- argon-3d-game-engineSkill
- argon-3d-scene-architectSkill
- argon-procedural-asset-generatorSkill
- argon-visual-critique-loopSkill
- argo-workflowsSkill
- autonomous-incident-healerSkill
- axum-web-serviceSkill
- bigquery-vector-searchSkill
- browser-qa-testerSkill
- chromadb-vector-storeSkill
- cilium-ebpf-networkingSkill
- clickhouse-analyticsSkill
- cloud-deploy-canarySkill
- cloudflare-r2-object-storageSkill
- cloudflare-workersSkill
- cloud-run-agentsSkill
- context-cachingSkill
- context-distillation-compressorSkill
- context-warmerSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- cost-oracle-finopsSkill
- cross-repo-swarm-syncSkill
- cve-remediation-orchestratorSkill
- database-architectSkill
- dataproc-spark-analyticsSkill
- dbt-transformationSkill
- debezium-cdcSkill
- devops-pipelineSkill
- distributed-rate-limitingSkill
- docker-compose-orchestratorSkill
- duckdb-local-olapSkill
- dynamic-thinking-allocationSkill
- ebpf-microvm-sandboxSkill
- ebpf-sandbox-enforcerSkill
- elephant-goldfish-modelSkill
- envoy-ai-gatewaySkill
- ephemeral-swarm-orchestratorSkill
- fastapi-productionSkill
- fullstack-nextjsSkill
- game-audio-synthesizerSkill
- game-studioSkill
- gemini-function-callingSkill
- gemini-groundingSkill
- gemini-live-audio-transcriberSkill
- gemini-live-multimodalSkill
- gemini-live-screen-visionSkill
- gemini-multimodalSkill
- genetic-prompt-cross-pollinatorSkill
- git-craftsmanSkill
- github-opsSkill
- google-axSkill
- google-flow-orchestratorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Never write production code based on vague requirements.
- Distinctive: line 21
Every modification must be coupled with automated validation (unit tests, integration suites, linters, or visual browser assertions).
- Distinctive: line 22
If tests fail, diagnose the root cause from the error log before modifying code.
- Distinctive: line 28
When given an ambiguous task (e.g., *"Make user onboarding faster"* or *"Add subscription billing"*), follow this three-stage breakdown:
- Distinctive: line 51
Before modifying core abstractions, evaluate the Risk Radius:
- Distinctive: line 63
When encountering unexpected test failures or runtime regressions:
- Distinctive: line 65
Read Full Error Trace: Never guess or apply speculative patches without inspecting the actual stack trace.
- Distinctive: line 66
Reproduce in Isolation: Create a minimal reproduction test or script before touching implementation files.
- Distinctive: line 67
Binary Search (Bisect): If behavior unexpectedly changed, identify the breaking commit or input change systematically.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
AI-First Engineering Principles & Delivery Playbook
This skill establishes best practices for orchestrating high-velocity software engineering tasks with AI agents. It bridges the gap between human product intent and deterministic, zero-hallucination agent execution.
1. Core Directives
- Deterministic Specification Before Code:
- Never write production code based on vague requirements.
- Deconstruct high-level prompts into verifiable acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then).
- Blast Radius Minimization:
- Scope code modifications strictly to the files necessary to satisfy the feature.
- Guard against accidental refactoring of unrelated subsystems or styles.
- Continuous Verification Loop:
- Every modification must be coupled with automated validation (unit tests, integration suites, linters, or visual browser assertions).
- If tests fail, diagnose the root cause from the error log before modifying code.
2. Requirement Decomposition Matrix
When given an ambiguous task (e.g., "Make user onboarding faster" or "Add subscription billing"), follow this three-stage breakdown:
[Ambiguous Goal] ──► [Milestone Decomposition] ──► [Executable Criteria] ──► [Zero-Regression Delivery]Stage 1: Milestone Decomposition
Break large tasks into discrete, independently testable phases:
- Phase 1: Contracts & Schema: Types, interfaces, database schemas, and API contracts.
- Phase 2: Failing Assertions (Red): Unit / integration tests validating expected behavior.
- Phase 3: Implementation (Green): Minimal surgical code satisfying the tests.
- Phase 4: Hardening & Docs (Refactor): Error handling, edge cases, logging, and documentation.
Stage 2: Executable Acceptance Criteria
Formulate specifications using the standard Gherkin / BDD structure:
- Given: Initial system state and prerequisites.
- When: Specific user or API action occurs.
- Then: Measurable system response, database state, or error envelope.
3. Risk Radius & Boundary Containment
Before modifying core abstractions, evaluate the Risk Radius:
| Radius Tier | Scope | Required Precautions |
| Tier 1: Leaf Node | Isolated helper functions, standalone components | Standard unit test verification |
| Tier 2: Service / Store | State management, database queries, shared services | Integration tests + typechecking |
| Tier 3: Core Abstraction | DB migrations, auth middleware, global config | Migration rollback plan + full test suite run |
4. Autonomous Debugging Protocol
When encountering unexpected test failures or runtime regressions:
- Read Full Error Trace: Never guess or apply speculative patches without inspecting the actual stack trace.
- Reproduce in Isolation: Create a minimal reproduction test or script before touching implementation files.
- Binary Search (Bisect): If behavior unexpectedly changed, identify the breaking commit or input change systematically.
- Surgical Fix: Apply the smallest possible fix that resolves the issue while preserving surrounding code formatting and comments.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

