agentleFS
saintdlesaintdle/agentflow/.agents/skills/to-tickets/SKILL.md

to-tickets

Skill2 starsChanged 15 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Convert an approved goal or implementation plan into a dependency-aware, independently verifiable Beads graph or GitHub issues for coding agents. Use when the user asks to break work into tickets, issues, a task graph, or agent-assignable work, or when an active repository workflow requires an issue before implementation. Do not publish external GitHub issues until the user approves the proposed breakdown unless explicit prior authorization says to publish.

192 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, to-questionnaire and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    to-questionnaire

    Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

    Also in 89 projects that use this

  • ryotaroh180105Skill

    claude-handoff

    Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.

    Also in 40 projects that use this

  • RoentekSkill

    loop-me

    Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.

    Also in 47 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    implement-spec

    Implement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in code.

    Also in 69 projects that use this

  • sponge-b0bSkill

    to-specs

    Project decision-complete planning into implementation Specs from exact Canonical Contract Ledger semantics while preserving Independent Specs and existing Spec identity.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from aws

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 183 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read issue-template.md before drafting or publishing issues.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Create early prerequisite tickets for shared interfaces or decisions.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Use expand-migrate-contract for wide mechanical changes that cannot be sliced vertically.

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    When Beads is active, create the approved graph there first.

    line 24
  5. Very specific:

    Keep each ticket's acceptance rows on their authoritative lanes.

    line 35
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not copy transient prompts or chat transcripts into the graph.

    line 43
  7. Distinctive:

    After creation, return a compact table of human title, bead ID, stage, blockers in human terms, suggested worker tier, GitHub issue when …

    line 49

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 183 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Turn a Plan into Tickets

Read issue-template.md before drafting or publishing issues.

Prepare

  1. Confirm the goal status is approved. If not, use shape-goal.
  2. Inspect repository instructions, Beads state when bd where --json succeeds, remotes, labels, issue templates, and current open issues. Do not duplicate existing work.
  3. Split work into tracer bullets: each ticket delivers a narrow end-to-end behavior and fits in one fresh agent context.
  4. Create early prerequisite tickets for shared interfaces or decisions. Serialize overlapping file ownership; parallelize disjoint scopes.
  5. Use expand-migrate-contract for wide mechanical changes that cannot be sliced vertically.

Draft and approve

Present the ticket titles, dependency edges, expected file ownership, and acceptance checks. Ask for approval before external writes unless the user already explicitly authorized issue creation for this plan.

Persist

When Beads is active, create the approved graph there first. Use dependency edges for prerequisites, parent-child relationships for controlled work, and acceptance criteria for verifiable completion. Store exact branch/base, ownership, required skills, provider budget, and validation lanes in the bead metadata. Use the agentflow-controlled-rework formula for controller-led reworks with dynamic sub-primary writers and two read-only review gates. Give each claimable node one af:stage:<name> and one af:role:<name> label; add only material af:cap:<name> requirements. Keep every pull scoped to its approved parent root. Label the root af:kind:workflow without a stage, role, or capability. Use --no-inherit-labels when creating dynamic children.

Keep each ticket's acceptance rows on their authoritative lanes. A settings API response or component receipt is not executable readiness: a hosted-runtime or architecture-specific row passes only with acceptance set --evidence-lane <lane> from that environment, and a row created with --whole-chain <ID> passes only with --evidence-scope whole-chain. If no ticket can reach that environment, leave the row planned and make the missing environment a visible blocker. Do not fold it into a waiver.

Do not copy transient prompts or chat transcripts into the graph.

Publish to GitHub

Create GitHub issues only when repository policy or the user requires a human-facing issue. Sync selected parent beads, not every internal worker bead. Use gh issue create with the repository's templates and labels. Assign the authenticated user or named worker only after verifying the identity with gh api user --jq .login; do not print credential data.

After creation, return a compact table of human title, bead ID, stage, blockers in human terms, suggested worker tier, GitHub issue when present, and URL. End with one copy/paste-ready next request. Store GitHub issue URLs as external references on the matching bead.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.