devils-advocate
Skill316 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Adversarially reviews whatever you bring it — prompts, strategies, plans, arguments, decisions, or workflows — and returns a structured, honest critique with scored dimensions and specific improvements. Combines a full prompt health check rubric with devil's advocate challenge modes for ideas, strategies, and decisions. Trigger this skill when the user says: "devil's advocate", "challenge this", "stress test", "poke holes in", "critique this", "what's wrong with", "find the flaws", "red team this", "what am I missing", "steelman the opposition", "evaluate my prompt", "review my prompt", "prompt health check", "rate my prompt", "is this a good prompt", "how can I improve this prompt", "evaluate this plan", "what could go wrong", "pre-mortem", "pressure test", "tear this apart", or any request to find weaknesses, gaps, or blind spots in something the user has shared. Also trigger when the user pastes a prompt, plan, strategy, or argument and asks for feedback — even without using these exact words.
36 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aditya-vermax/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Cold-IQ/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wtfzambo/devils-advocatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- axiomantic/spellbooktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use validate-bib, review-r and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
luischanciSkillvalidate-bib
Validate bibliography entries against citations in all manuscript files. Find missing entries and unused references.
Also in 5 projects that use this
luischanciSkillreview-r
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
Also in 3 projects that use this
amaclullichSkilllit-review
Literature review workflow: Search PubMed for papers, save to Zotero, generate summary tables. Use when user wants to find papers on a topic, build a reference collection, or create a literature summary.
Also in 4 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkillinterview-me
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
Also in 5 projects that use this
shanggqmSkilldata-analysis
数据分析技能,提供结构化的数据查询、统计分析和报告生成工作流。当用户需要查询数据库、进行数据统计分析、生成分析报告时使用。按规范输出原始数据、计算结果、Markdown报告和HTML可视化报告。
Also in 4 projects that use this
JohnJBorenSkillproduct-manager
Product development workflows, PRDs, prioritization frameworks, and roadmap planning
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from luischanci
Other versions36 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Cold-IQ/ColdIQ-s-GTM-Skills★ 316100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 35
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- OneWave-AI/claude-skills★ 378same name
- Mathews-Tom/armory★ 340same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- maxwell2732/paper-replicate-agent-demo★ 134same name
- maxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agent★ 106same name
- notmanas/claude-code-skills★ 93same name
- jpcaparas/skills★ 53same name
- gsarig/skills★ 30same name
- excatt/superclaude-plusplus★ 14same name
25 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-personalization-promptsSkill
- atl-btl-messagingSkill
- bridgebound-firmographic-15Skill
- bridgebound-history-16Skill
- bridgebound-in-market-20Skill
- bridgebound-relationship-39Skill
- bridgebound-symptoms-11Skill
- buying-signals-6Skill
- cold-call-scriptsSkill
- cold-email-4-sequenceSkill
- cold-email-templates-34Skill
- coldiq-messaging-templatesSkill
- design-directorSkill
- design-packagesSkill
- design-stackSkill
- design-studioSkill
- drawing-analyzerSkill
- email-1-variations-7Skill
- email-metrics-benchmarksSkill
- email-writing-frameworksSkill
- gtm-philosophySkill
- gtm-plays-11Skill
- inbound-triggers-30Skill
- josh-braun-copywritingSkill
- lead-sources-guideSkill
- linkedin-campaign-completeSkill
- linkedin-limits-warmupSkill
- linkedin-success-factorsSkill
- list-building-tipsSkill
- outbound-triggers-6Skill
- outreach-4-categoriesSkill
- personalization-6-bucketsSkill
- personalization-hooksSkill
- personalization-playbooksSkill
- sdr-master-promptsSkill
- sdr-outbound-rulesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 29 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 29 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

