btt
Skill9 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write bulloak tree specifications (.tree files) for smart contract integration tests. Trigger phrases - write a tree, create test tree, BTT spec, bulloak tree, Branching Tree Technique, or when writing integration tests for contract functions.
- Installs packages
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- cli-forgeSkill
- evm-deploymentSkill
- sablier-designSkill
- sablier-iconSkill
- sablier-writingSkill
- spec-from-screenshotSkill
- tailwind-cssSkill
- viemSkill
- xstate-reactSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Write bulloak tree specifications for smart contract tests.
- Very specific: line 95
If a branch starts with either when or given, it is a condition.
- Very specific: line 96
If a branch starts with it, it is an action.
- Distinctive: line 133
If it returns false, your repo agent will look into it and fix the issues.
- Distinctive: line 139
Start with guard conditions that cause early reverts:
- Distinctive: line 192
Put events in parenthesis: {EventName}.
- Distinctive: line 239
Test this skill with these prompts:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Branching Tree Technique (BTT) Skill
Write bulloak tree specifications for smart contract tests.
Bundled References
| Reference | Content | When to Read |
./references/examples.md | Complete tree and generated test examples | When learning BTT syntax |
./references/sablier-conventions.md | Sablier-specific terminology and examples | When working in Sablier repos |
What is Bulloak?
Bulloak is a Solidity test generator that creates test scaffolds from .tree specification files. It offers a
structured approach to test case design that ensures comprehensive coverage of all possible scenarios and edge cases in
your smart contract tests.
Commands
To install Bulloak, if not found
cargo install bulloakGenerate test contract from a .tree file
bulloak scaffold -w --skip-modifiers --format-descriptions <path/to/file.tree>where:
-wwrites the.t.solonly if it does not exist. Adding-f(-wf) overwrites an existing test and discards implemented bodies; to add tests for new branches, usebulloak check --fix --skip-modifiers --format-descriptions.--format-descriptionscapitalizes the first letter of the branch in the test contract and add a period at the end of it.--skip-modifiersskips the generation of modifiers. We do this because we put all the modifiers in a separateModifiers.solfile.
Check if the code in .t.sol file matches the specification in the .tree file
bulloak check --skip-modifiers <path/to/file.tree>Important: Tree Files Should NOT Have Periods
Tree files should not have periods at the end of it branches. The --format-descriptions flag automatically:
- Capitalizes the first letter
- Adds a period at the end
# Correct (no period)
└── it should revert
# Wrong (has period)
└── it should revert.Tree Syntax
Structure
FunctionName_ContractName_Integration_Test
├── condition1
│ └── outcome1
└── condition2
└── outcome2Terminology
| Keyword | Purpose |
when | Conditional branch (user input or timestamp) |
given | Pre-condition contract state branch |
it | Action/assertion (leaf node) |
whenandgivenbecome modifiers if they have nested branches.
Spec
- In case of single tree per file, the root should be just the function name followed by
_Integration_Concrete_Test. - In case of multiple trees in the same file, each root must be
Contract::function, using::as a separator, and all roots must share the same contract name (e.g.,Foo::hashPair,Foo::min). - bulloak expects you to use ├ and └ characters to denote branches
- If a branch starts with either
whenorgiven, it is a condition.whenandgivenare interchangeable. - If a branch starts with
it, it is an action. Any child branch an action has is called an action description.
Examples
For examples, see ./references/examples.md.
Rules
- The test file must be placed in the
tests/integration/concrete/{function}directory. - The directory name must use
-format. For example, if the function name iscreateFlowStream, the corrresponding test tree and test file must be placed in thetests/integration/concrete/create-flow-streamdirectory. - The tree file name must be
{function}.tree. - The test file name must be
{function}.t.sol. - The root node of the spec and the Contract name must be
{FunctionName}_Integration_Concrete_Test.
Workflow
1. Create the Tree File
Location for tree file: tests/integration/concrete/{function-name}/{functionName}.tree
Note: Your repo's agent will provide the exact directory structure.
2. Generate Test Scaffold
bulloak scaffold -w --skip-modifiers --format-descriptions <path/to/file.tree>This generates a .t.sol file.
3. Check Tree-Test Alignment
bulloak check --skip-modifiers <path/to/file.tree>If it returns false, your repo agent will look into it and fix the issues.
Best Practices
1. Order Conditions Logically
Start with guard conditions that cause early reverts:
├── when delegate call // First: delegation check
│ └── it should revert
└── when no delegate call
├── given null // Second: existence check
│ └── it should revert
└── given not null
├── when amount zero // Third: input validation
│ └── it should revert
└── when amount not zero
└── ... // Finally: business logic2. Use Consistent Terminology
Some examples below:
| Concept | Convention |
| Resource doesn't exist | given null |
| Resource exists | given not null |
| Caller check | when caller {role} |
| Amount check | when amount {condition} |
Whenever possible, try to use less words and more concise language for the branches.
3. Group Related Conditions
└── when withdrawal address not zero
├── when withdrawal address not owner // Non-owner cases
│ ├── when caller sender
│ ├── when caller unknown
│ └── when caller recipient
└── when withdrawal address owner // Owner cases
└── ...4. Detailed Leaf Nodes for Happy Path
For success cases, enumerate all side effects:
└── it should make the withdrawal
├── it should reduce the entry balance by the withdrawn amount
├── it should reduce the aggregate amount by the withdrawn amount
├── it should update the entry state
├── it should update the timestamp
└── it should emit {Transfer}, {Withdraw} and {MetadataUpdate} eventsPut events in parenthesis: {EventName}.
5. Don't Add a Modifier with the Same Name as the Function
A test function should NEVER have a modifier that matches its own name. The function name already encodes the condition — adding a same-name modifier is redundant.
// WRONG: modifier matches the function name
function test_WhenWithdrawAmountNotZero()
external
whenWithdrawalAddressNotZero
whenWithdrawAmountNotZero // <- WRONG: redundant, same as the function name
{ }
// CORRECT:
function test_WhenWithdrawAmountNotZero() external whenWithdrawalAddressNotZero { }6. Use proper indentation
Child branch symbols (├/└) must align with the tail of parent's └── or ├── (3 spaces, not 4):
└── when withdrawal address not zero
├── when withdrawal address not owner ✓ Correct (3 spaces)
│ └── when caller senderRunning Bulloak
# Scaffold tests from tree
bulloak scaffold -w --skip-modifiers --format-descriptions <path/to/file.tree>
# Check all trees in a directory
bulloak check --skip-modifiers tests/**/*.treeFull Documentation
https://github.com/alexfertel/bulloak/blob/main/README.md
Example Invocations
Test this skill with these prompts:
- Basic tree: "Write a BTT tree for a
depositfunction that reverts when amount is zero and succeeds otherwise" - Complex tree: "Create a tree spec for
withdrawthat checks null stream, caller authorization, and amount validation" - Sablier-specific: "Write a BTT tree for
cancelin the Lockup protocol with proper stream state checks"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

