agentleFS
Sign inStart free
s3644s3644/academic-copilot-skills/.github/skills/academic-paper/SKILL.md

academic-paper

Skill8 starsChanged 2 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Academic paper writing assistant. Use when the user needs: write a paper, guided paper planning, paper outline, revision based on reviewer comments, abstract writing, literature review paper, citation format conversion, citation checking, AI disclosure statement. Supports 6 paper types (IMRaD, Lit Review, Theoretical, Case Study, Policy Brief, Conference), 5 citation formats (APA 7, Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver), bilingual abstracts (EN + 中文). Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, draft, revise, abstract, convert citations, check citations, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文.

  • Reads credentials
  • Installs packages

13 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use sr-screener.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • modbusLVSkill

    sr-screener

    Protocol-driven study screening for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews. Turns a proposal or PROSPERO protocol into confirmed eligibility rules, then screens titles/abstracts and full texts with two blinded AI reviewers and a third-reviewer adjudicator: ordered exclusion codes, no silent defaults, resumable batch runs, QC (seed studies, near-miss rechecks, kappa and PABAK), PRISMA 2020 counts, EndNote/Zotero RIS groups, an Excel log, a methods draft and a literature_corpus handoff to academic-paper. Reads RIS, PubMed .nbib, Web of Science and CSV exports; removes duplicates. 8 modes: protocol, quick, pilot, ta-screen, ft-screen, adjudicate, audit, report. Use it to screen records against eligibility criteria, pilot screening, resolve screening conflicts, audit exclusions or report the selection process. Triggers on: screen these papers, title/abstract screening, full-text screening, screening conflicts, inclusion criteria, PRISMA flow, غربالگری مقالات, اسکرینینگ عنوان و چکیده, معیارهای ورود و خروج.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

30 rules. 0 are common, 29 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 29

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free