agentleFS
rvdbreemenrvdbreemen/adr-kit/AGENTS.md

adr-kit

AGENTS.md13 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

These instructions adapt the repository guidance for Codex and other coding agents working in adr-kit. - Treat Backlog.md as the source of truth for meaningful work. - Search for an existing task before starting implementation work. - If no task exists, create one before editing code or docs. - Prefer the Backlog MCP tools for reading, searching, creating, and updating tasks. Use the backlog CLI only when MCP is unavailable or insufficient. - Do not edit files in backlog/tasks/ directly.…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Treat Backlog.md as the source of truth for meaningful work.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Search for an existing task before starting implementation work.

    line 9
  3. Distinctive:

    If no task exists, create one before editing code or docs.

    line 10
  4. Very specific:

    Prefer the Backlog MCP tools for reading, searching, creating, and updating tasks.

    line 11
  5. Very specific:

    Do not edit files in backlog/tasks/ directly.

    line 13
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep tasks small enough to finish in one focused pass.

    line 14
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep changes small, focused, and dependency-free unless the roadmap says otherwise.

    line 18
  8. Very specific:

    Follow the existing adr-kit conventions in README.md, ROADMAP.md, and CLAUDE.md.

    line 20
  9. Distinctive:

    Run the smallest test or check that proves the change.

    line 26
  10. Distinctive:

    Before marking work done, make sure the task status and notes in Backlog are updated to match the actual change.

    line 29
  11. Very specific:

    Read .adr-kit/ADR-guide.md before architectural changes.

    line 35

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

adr-kit Agent Instructions

These instructions adapt the repository guidance for Codex and other coding agents working in adr-kit.

Task management

  • Treat Backlog.md as the source of truth for meaningful work.
  • Search for an existing task before starting implementation work.
  • If no task exists, create one before editing code or docs.
  • Prefer the Backlog MCP tools for reading, searching, creating, and updating tasks. Use the backlog CLI only when MCP is unavailable or insufficient.
  • Do not edit files in backlog/tasks/ directly.
  • Keep tasks small enough to finish in one focused pass.

Repo conventions

  • Keep changes small, focused, and dependency-free unless the roadmap says otherwise.
  • Follow the existing adr-kit conventions in README.md, ROADMAP.md, and CLAUDE.md.
  • Favor deterministic, stdlib-first changes over new runtime dependencies.

Verification

  • Run the smallest test or check that proves the change.
  • Broaden verification when the change touches shared behavior, tooling, package layout, or user-facing workflow.
  • Before marking work done, make sure the task status and notes in Backlog are updated to match the actual change.
<!-- ADR-KIT CODEX START -->

ADR Kit

Read .adr-kit/ADR-guide.md before architectural changes. Architecture decisions live in docs/adr/. Use $adr-kit:context before implementation, $adr-kit:adr for new decisions, and $adr-kit:judge before commit.

<!-- ADR-KIT CODEX END -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.