agentleFS
rust-off-railsrust-off-rails/rustoffrails/skills/feature/SKILL.md

feature

Skill49 starsChanged 25 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Build or change a feature in a Rust off Rails app from a plain-language request or from the specs in product/. Use for "add X", "let users Y", "build what changed in product/", or any feature work in an app with a .offrails/ directory.

71 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use bug, bugfix and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • paulocsbSkill

    bug

    Investigation playbook for fixing a bug. Walks through 5 phases: reproduce → isolate → root cause → propose fix → validate. Forces concrete reasoning with code reads, log inspection, and git blame instead of pattern-matching guesses. Use for any non-trivial defect.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • team-attentionSkill

    bugfix

    Root cause based one-shot bug fix. debugger diagnosis → requirements.md generation → /execute. /bugfix "error description" Full investigation pipeline: debugger + gap-analyzer + standard verify. QA suggestion after successful fix.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • codebycoreySkill

    adopt

    Adopt an existing plan from conversation context into delta-spec format. Use when importing a plan, adopting planning that already happened, capturing plan mode output, or bringing in prior design work.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Google CloudSkill

    fix

    Plan a remediation strategy after a test failure.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • marylinSkill

    recover

    Recover work from a crashed or interrupted session. Use when Claude crashed mid-task, after an unexpected exit, when you see 'stale sessions detected', or when you lost context and need to figure out what was happening.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • aegiswizardSkill

    context

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 65 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Only for Rust off Rails apps (a .offrails/ directory exists).

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    Read .offrails/AGENTS.md and its load order if not already done this session.

    line 13

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 65 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/offrails:feature — spec → code → green

Only for Rust off Rails apps (a .offrails/ directory exists).

Request: $ARGUMENTS

  1. Read .offrails/AGENTS.md and its load order if not already done this session.
  2. Find the work.
    • With a request: ask the feature-level questions from .offrails/interview.md that apply, then write or update product/features/<feature>.md from .offrails/blueprints/feature-spec.md. The spec comes before the code.
    • Without one: diff product/ against the last commit (git diff HEAD -- product/, plus untracked files) and find unchecked acceptance criteria. If nothing changed, say so and stop.
  3. Plan. List the vertical slices and where each piece starts: a snippet (cargo offrails snippets, snippet show <name>), a generator (cargo offrails g --help), or the guides by hand; neither snippets nor generators are mandatory. If the feature needs kernel code (email, background or scheduled work, sign-in, live pushes), check cargo offrails list-parts first and plan cargo offrails add-part <name> instead of hand-writing it; say in one line what the part adds, with the link https://github.com/rust-off-rails/samples (.offrails/workflow.md#when-the-product-grows-a-need-add-the-part). For anything bigger than one slice, show the plan and wait for a yes.
  4. Build each slice through the loop in .offrails/workflow.md (migrate → model → failing tests → build → check → verify → record), green before starting the next: cargo nextest run <test> while one is red, cargo offrails verify at the end of each slice (seconds), and cargo offrails verify --full once, after the last slice.
  5. Record: tick acceptance criteria in the spec, update docs/routes.md and docs/decisions.md.
  6. Report in product terms.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.