tca-swiftui
Skill13 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use for any question about The Composable Architecture (TCA) — defining reducers, managing state, handling navigation, writing tests, or working with dependencies. Essential when encountering TCA-specific types like @Reducer, @ObservableState, StackState, StackAction, @Presents, TestStore, @DependencyClient, Scope, or delegate actions. Also use when debugging TCA compiler errors, decomposing large reducers into child features, migrating from old TCA patterns (WithViewStore, Environment, IfLetStore), or implementing sheet/push navigation in TCA. Claude's training data contains outdated TCA patterns — invoke this skill whenever TCA code is involved to get correct modern (1.7+) patterns.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- gcd-operationsSkill
- ios-accessibilitySkill
- ios-localizationSkill
- ios-loggingSkill
- ios-securitySkill
- ios-testingSkill
- swift-concurrencySkill
- swiftui-mvvmSkill
- uikit-mvvmSkill
- viper-uikitSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
26 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 21 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
21
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 84
Use three-category action pattern: view(ViewAction), internal(InternalAction), delegate(DelegateAction) (rules.md)
- Very specific: line 86
Add child features via Scope, ifLet, or forEach BEFORE parent Reduce block
- Very specific: line 87
Create dependencies with @DependencyClient macro (dependencies.md)
- Very specific: line 89
Write exhaustive TestStore tests (testing.md)
- Very specific: line 97
Create refactoring/ directory with per-feature plan files (refactoring-workflow.md)
- Very specific: line 99
Use Scope(state:action:) for always-present children
- Very specific: line 100
Use .ifLet(\.$destination, action: \.destination) for optional children — effects auto-cancel on dismissal
- Very specific: line 101
Use .forEach(\.path, action: \.path) for stack navigation
- Very specific: line 103
Write non-exhaustive integration tests for cross-feature flows (testing.md)
- Very specific: line 109
Ensure TCA 1.4+ with @Reducer macro on all reducers (prerequisite)
- Distinctive: line 117
Run existing tests — all must pass before proceeding to next feature
- Very specific: line 125
Use @Reducer macro — never bare struct Feature: Reducer conformance
- Very specific: line 126
Use @ObservableState on ALL State types — never generate State without it
- Very specific: line 128
Use @Reducer enum for Destination/Path reducers (TCA 1.8+) — eliminates massive boilerplate
- Very specific: line 131
Use @Bindable var store when $store bindings are needed
- Very specific: line 132
Use .run { send in } for effects — never EffectTask, .task { }, .fireAndForget { }
- Distinctive: line 133
Use enum-with-cases for cancel IDs — never empty enum types (pruned in release builds)
- Very specific: line 134
Never capture whole @ObservableState in effect closures — extract needed values first
- Very specific: line 135
Never do expensive work in reducers — they run on main thread.
- Distinctive: line 139
When working with TCA code, you may encounter cryptic compiler errors.
- Very specific: line 142
"Circular reference resolving attached macro 'Reducer'": Don't nest @Reducer struct Y inside extension of another @Reducer struct X.
- Very specific: line 143
Macro + property wrapper conflict: Avoid property wrappers inside @ObservableState State.
- Very specific: line 145
NavigationStack dismiss fights: Ensure .navigationDestination is OUTSIDE ForEach/List, not inside.
- Distinctive: line 150
When migrating legacy TCA code or writing new features, these 7 tokens come up repeatedly.
- Very specific: line 164
When a child feature finishes (save, cancel, delete) and the parent uses @Presents, the parent MUST dismiss in the same handler that …
- Distinctive: line 192
Before finalizing generated or refactored TCA code, verify ALL:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Approach: Production-First Iterative Refactoring — This skill is built for production enterprise codebases using The Composable Architecture. Architecture changes are delivered through iterative refactoring — small, focused PRs tracked in a
refactoring/directory. AI tools consistently generate outdated TCA code (pre-1.4 patterns, WithViewStore, Environment, Combine Effects). Every rule here exists to prevent those mistakes.
TCA SwiftUI Architecture (iOS 16+, TCA 1.7+)
Enterprise-grade skill for The Composable Architecture (point-free/swift-composable-architecture). Opinionated: prescribes @Reducer macro, @ObservableState, struct-of-closures dependencies, delegate actions for child-parent communication, and modern navigation via @Presents/StackState. TCA's API changed substantially across versions — AI tools trained on pre-1.7 code consistently generate WithViewStore, IfLetStore, Environment, and other removed patterns. This skill encodes the modern (1.7+) patterns validated against real enterprise codebases.
If the project uses TCA <1.7, consult
references/migration.mdfor pre-macro patterns and incremental upgrade path.
Architecture Layers
View Layer → SwiftUI Views. Direct store access, NO WithViewStore.
Owns store via let/var. Uses @Bindable for $ bindings.
Reducer Layer → @Reducer struct. State + Action + body. Pure logic.
Returns Effect for async work. ALWAYS runs on main thread.
Effect Layer → .run { send in } for async. .send for sync delegate actions.
Cancellable, mergeable, concatenatable.
Dependency Layer → @DependencyClient structs. Struct-of-closures, NOT protocols.
liveValue (app) / testValue (auto-unimplemented) / previewValue.Quick Decision Trees
"Should this be its own Feature reducer?"
Does this component have its own screen/view?
├── YES → Own @Reducer struct
└── NO → Does it have business logic you want to unit test?
├── YES → Own @Reducer struct, compose via Scope
└── NO → Is its state optional (not always visible)?
├── YES → Own @Reducer, use ifLet (avoids unnecessary work)
└── NO → Keep logic in parent reducer"What navigation pattern do I need?"
What type of navigation?
├── Modal (sheet/alert/dialog/fullScreenCover)?
│ → Tree-based: @Presents + PresentationAction + ifLet
├── Single drill-down?
│ → Tree-based: optional state + navigationDestination
├── Multi-level push (NavigationStack)?
│ → Stack-based: StackState + StackAction + forEach
├── Deep linking is critical?
│ → Stack-based (easy to construct state array)
└── Modals FROM within a NavigationStack?
→ BOTH: stack for push nav, tree for sheets/alerts"How should child communicate with parent?"
Child needs to tell parent something happened?
├── Use delegate action: case delegate(DelegateAction)
│ Parent observes ONLY .delegate cases, never child internals
│
Child needs to share logic between action cases?
├── Use mutating func on State or private helper method
│ NEVER send an action to share logic — it traverses the entire reducer tree unnecessarily,
│ creating hidden coupling and making performance profiling difficult
│
Sibling reducers need to communicate?
└── Delegate up to parent, parent coordinates
NEVER send actions between siblings directly — siblings should not know about each otherWorkflows
Workflow: Create a New TCA Feature
When: Building a new screen or self-contained feature from scratch.
- Define State as
@ObservableState structinside@Reducer— conform toEquatable - Define Action enum inside
@Reducer— NOEquatableconformance needed (TCA 1.4+) - Use three-category action pattern:
view(ViewAction),internal(InternalAction),delegate(DelegateAction)(rules.md) - Implement
var body: some ReducerOf<Self>— useReduce<State, Action> { }for explicit generics (helps Xcode autocomplete) - Add child features via
Scope,ifLet, orforEachBEFORE parentReduceblock - Create dependencies with
@DependencyClientmacro (dependencies.md) - Wire view: direct
store.propertyaccess,@Bindable var storefor$bindings - Write exhaustive TestStore tests (
testing.md)
Workflow: Decompose a God Reducer
When: A single reducer handles logic for multiple screens, has 800+ lines, or testing is impossible to isolate.
- Identify feature boundaries — each screen = own reducer
- Scan for anti-patterns using detection checklist (
anti-patterns.md) - Create
refactoring/directory with per-feature plan files (refactoring-workflow.md) - Extract child reducers bottom-up: leaf features first, then mid-level, then root
- Use
Scope(state:action:)for always-present children - Use
.ifLet(\.$destination, action: \.destination)for optional children — effects auto-cancel on dismissal - Use
.forEach(\.path, action: \.path)for stack navigation - Convert child-parent communication to delegate actions — parent must NEVER observe child internal actions
- Write non-exhaustive integration tests for cross-feature flows (
testing.md)
Workflow: Migrate Legacy TCA to Modern (1.7+)
When: Modernizing pre-1.7 TCA code that uses WithViewStore, IfLetStore, Environment, etc.
- Ensure TCA 1.4+ with
@Reducermacro on all reducers (prerequisite) - Migrate feature-by-feature, bottom-up (leaf features first) (
migration.md) - Per feature: add
@ObservableStateto State AND update view simultaneously — never one without the other - Replace
@PresentationStatewith@Presents - Replace
WithViewStore(store, observe: { $0 })with directstore.propertyaccess - Replace
IfLetStore/ForEachStore/SwitchStorewith native SwiftUI + store.scope - Replace
NavigationStackStorewithNavigationStack(path: $store.scope(...)) - For iOS 16: wrap views in
WithPerceptionTracking { } - Run existing tests — all must pass before proceeding to next feature
- See full migration checklist and syntax transformations in
migration.md
Code Generation Rules
<critical_rules> AI tools consistently generate outdated TCA code. Every output must use MODERN TCA (1.7+). ALWAYS:
- Use
@Reducermacro — never barestruct Feature: Reducerconformance - Use
@ObservableStateon ALL State types — never generate State without it - Define State AND Action INSIDE the
@Reducerstruct body — never in extensions (macros can't see them) - Use
@Reducer enumfor Destination/Path reducers (TCA 1.8+) — eliminates massive boilerplate - Action does NOT need
Equatable— remove it. Why: TCA 1.4+ uses case key paths for cancellation andreceive()matching, making Equatable conformance unnecessary and a maintenance burden - Access store properties directly:
store.count,store.send(.tapped)— NEVER useWithViewStore - Use
@Bindable var storewhen$storebindings are needed - Use
.run { send in }for effects — neverEffectTask,.task { },.fireAndForget { } - Use enum-with-cases for cancel IDs — never empty enum types (pruned in release builds)
- Never capture whole
@ObservableStatein effect closures — extract needed values first - Never do expensive work in reducers — they run on main thread. Offload to
.runeffects. </critical_rules>
<fallback_strategies> When working with TCA code, you may encounter cryptic compiler errors. If you fail to fix the same error twice:
- "compiler is unable to type-check this expression": State/Action likely defined in extension instead of inside
@Reducerstruct. Move them inside. - "Circular reference resolving attached macro 'Reducer'": Don't nest
@Reducer struct Yinside extension of another@Reducer struct X. Extract to top level. - Macro + property wrapper conflict: Avoid property wrappers inside
@ObservableStateState. Use@ObservationStateIgnoredas workaround (changes won't trigger re-renders). - "A 'reduce' method should not be defined in a reducer with a 'body'": Never define BOTH
reduce(into:action:)ANDvar bodyin the same reducer. - NavigationStack dismiss fights: Ensure
.navigationDestinationis OUTSIDEForEach/List, not inside. </fallback_strategies>
Modernization Migration Cheat-Sheet
When migrating legacy TCA code or writing new features, these 7 tokens come up repeatedly. They are NOT optional — AI tools consistently default to the outdated form on the left. Always use the right column.
| Legacy / outdated | Modern (TCA 1.7+, 2026) | Why |
environment.mainQueue | @Dependency(\.continuousClock) | mainQueue was the pre-1.0 scheduler injection. In modern TCA, timing is a Clock dependency — override it with ImmediateClock or TestClock in tests. |
AnySchedulerOf<DispatchQueue> in State | @Dependency(\.continuousClock) | Same as above. Schedulers are no longer passed through State — they are dependencies. Use try await clock.sleep(for: .seconds(0.3)) in .run effects. |
@Bindable var store (iOS 17+ only) | iOS 16: @Perception.Bindable var store — iOS 17+: @Bindable var store | @Perception.Bindable is TCA's backport of SwiftUI's @Bindable for iOS 16 because Apple's @Bindable requires iOS 17. Without it, $store.binding fails to compile on iOS 16 targets. |
Bool showLogoutAlert in State | @Presents var alert: AlertState<Action>? | Alerts belong in AlertState, not in booleans — this gives you message text, button state, and action dispatching in one value, and it auto-dismisses through standard @Presents. |
[Product] in State | IdentifiedArrayOf<Product> | Plain arrays force O(n) updates-by-ID and confuse ForEachStore. IdentifiedArrayOf (import IdentifiedCollections) is the canonical TCA collection — constant-time lookup by id, stable animations, required by forEach(\.items, ...). |
var filtered: [T] { state.items.filter { ... } } (computed) | Stored var filtered: IdentifiedArrayOf<T> updated in the reducer | Computed vars on State hide reducer work from TCA's observation system and run on every access. Store the derived value and recompute it in the action that changes the source — it shows up in the action log and is testable. |
.run { try? await api.delete(id) } | .run { send in try await api.delete(id); await send(.deleteSucceeded) } catch: { error, send in await send(.deleteFailed(error)) } | try? inside effects is a silent-failure bug — the UI thinks the delete worked but nothing changed on the server. Use the catch: parameter on .run and emit an explicit failure action. |
Dismiss-in-delegate-handler pattern
When a child feature finishes (save, cancel, delete) and the parent uses @Presents, the parent MUST dismiss in the same handler that processes the delegate action:
case .destination(.presented(.editor(.delegate(.saved(let item))))):
state.items.append(item)
state.destination = nil // ← REQUIRED. Without this, the sheet stays open.
return .noneForgetting state.destination = nil is the #1 TCA navigation bug — the save succeeds but the sheet never dismisses. For an alternative, child features can use @Dependency(\.dismiss) and call await dismiss() inside their own effects.
unimplemented(placeholder:) for non-Void test dependencies
@DependencyClient's testValue auto-generates unimplemented(...) for () -> Void closures, but returning non-Void requires a placeholder. Without it, the test crashes with "dependency has no implementation":
@DependencyClient
struct ProfileClient {
var fetch: @Sendable (User.ID) async throws -> Profile = {
_ in unimplemented("ProfileClient.fetch", placeholder: Profile.mock)
}
}The placeholder: value is used only when the test does NOT assert against fetch — it prevents the crash while still failing the test if the call is unexpected.
Confidence Checks
Before finalizing generated or refactored TCA code, verify ALL:
[ ] @Reducer macro — present on all feature structs
[ ] @ObservableState — present on all State types
[ ] State/Action — defined INSIDE @Reducer struct, not in extensions
[ ] No WithViewStore — direct store access everywhere
[ ] No Equatable on Action — removed (unnecessary since TCA 1.4)
[ ] Delegate actions — child-parent communication uses .delegate pattern
[ ] Effect closures — capture only needed values, not whole state
[ ] Cancel IDs — enum with cases, NOT empty enum types
[ ] Navigation — @Presents for modals, StackState for push nav, never nested NavigationStack
[ ] Dependencies — @DependencyClient struct-of-closures, not protocols
[ ] Tests — TestStore with exhaustive assertions, @MainActor annotated
[ ] Schedulers — `@Dependency(\.continuousClock)`, NOT `mainQueue` or `AnySchedulerOf`
[ ] iOS 16 bindings — `@Perception.Bindable` used instead of `@Bindable` when deployment target is iOS 16
[ ] Collections in State — `IdentifiedArrayOf` used instead of `[T]`
[ ] Derived state — stored property updated in reducer, NOT a computed var on State
[ ] `.run` effects — use `catch:` parameter, never `try?` inside effect closures
[ ] Alert state — `AlertState<Action>` in `@Presents`, NOT a `Bool showXAlert`
[ ] File size — new files <= 400 lines; oversized files have split task in refactoring/Companion Skills
| Project need | Companion skill | Apply when |
| Swift Concurrency patterns | skills/swift-concurrency/SKILL.md | Writing async effects, actor isolation, Sendable compliance |
| GCD/OperationQueue legacy code | skills/gcd-operations/SKILL.md | Legacy async work before migrating to TCA effects |
| Comprehensive testing guidance | skills/ios-testing/SKILL.md | Advanced testing patterns beyond TCA TestStore |
| Security audit | skills/ios-security/SKILL.md | Auditing Keychain usage, network security in TCA apps |
References
| Reference | When to Read |
references/rules.md | Do's and Don'ts quick reference: modern TCA patterns and critical anti-patterns |
references/reducer-architecture.md | @Reducer macro rules, feature decomposition, parent-child scoping, state design |
references/effects.md | Effect API (.run, .send, .merge, .cancel), cancellation, long-running effects, anti-patterns |
references/dependencies.md | @DependencyClient, DependencyKey, liveValue/testValue, module boundaries, test guards |
references/navigation.md | Tree-based (@Presents/ifLet), stack-based (StackState/forEach), dismissal, deep linking |
references/testing.md | TestStore exhaustive/non-exhaustive, TestClock, case key paths, per-feature checklist |
references/migration.md | Version progression, per-feature migration checklist, syntax transformations, known issues |
references/anti-patterns.md | AI-specific mistakes, god reducer signs, performance pitfalls, enterprise concerns |
references/performance.md | Action costs, _printChanges, .signpost, scope performance, high-frequency action mitigation |
references/refactoring-workflow.md | refactoring/ directory protocol, per-feature plans, PR sizing, phase ordering |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

