proposal-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Write a client proposal from a brief, call notes, or a rough description of the project. Use when the user asks for a proposal, quote, pitch document, or "write up what we discussed for the client".
29 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Jakeschincariol/closer-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cntheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jqaisystems/jqai-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Nomanriaz786/claude-consulting-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- genspark-ai/genofficetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ARCASSystems/FounderOStheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sop-writer, weekly-report and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Dokkabei97Skillsop-writer
Creates Standard Operating Procedures for repetitive tasks. Generates step-by-step documentation with checklists, decision trees, and responsibility assignments to eliminate single points of failure.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillweekly-report
**WORKFLOW SKILL** — Generate weekly executive reports for the azd team. Pulls PR/issue/release data from GitHub, reads changelogs, combines with team notes, and produces a polished markdown report.
Also in 5 projects that use this
akhilkannurSkillcontent-repurposer
Also in 4 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillmeeting-notes
>
Also in 3 projects that use this
LangChainSkilllinkedin-post
Write a LinkedIn post based on research findings or a given topic. Use this skill when asked to create LinkedIn content, professional posts, or thought leadership pieces.
Also in 3 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkillinterview-me
需求不明時的意圖萃取訪談:一次一題、每題附上自己的猜測、聽出「真正想要 vs 覺得應該要」,直到能預測使用者反應(約 95% 信心)才動工。適用:需求缺少對象 / 動機 / 成功標準 / 約束,或使用者點名「訪談我」「先確認一下」「我們確定嗎」。明確自足的指示、純資訊查詢、機械性操作不適用。
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- kritikosgns-web/freelancer-ops-skills-lite★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 28
- genspark-ai/genoffice★ 12ksame name
- claude-office-skills/skills★ 433same name
- hamzafarooq/claude-code-starter★ 145same name
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- ncklrs/startup-os-skills★ 51same name
- Jakeschincariol/closer-skill★ 33same name
- Xipher-Labs/walter-os★ 8same name
- ARCASSystems/FounderOS★ 7same name
- chakmarebel/federal-proposal-copilot★ 4same name
- dotlabshq/crux★ 4same name
18 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- invoice-followupSkill
- scope-guardSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 20 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
No adjectives about the user's own work ("world-class", "innovative").
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 20 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Proposal Writer
Turn messy inputs (call notes, an email thread, a one-line description) into a proposal the client can approve in one read.
Before writing
Extract these from the input. If any is missing, ask for it in ONE message with all gaps listed — do not write a proposal with placeholders for price or scope.
| Field | Why it matters |
| Client name + decision maker | Address the person who signs |
| Business outcome they want | The proposal sells the outcome, not the deliverables |
| Deliverables (concrete, countable) | Scope creep protection |
| Timeline + start date | Anchors urgency |
| Price + payment terms | Never leave blank |
| What's NOT included | Pre-empts the "I thought that was included" email |
Structure (use these headings, in this order)
- The goal — 2–3 sentences in the client's words. What changes for their business when this is done.
- What I'll deliver — numbered list. Each item is a noun the client can check off ("3 landing pages", "a 12-slide deck"), never a verb ("optimize", "improve").
- How it works — 3–5 phases with dates. Each phase ends with something the client sees.
- What I need from you — their inputs and response times. This becomes the clause that protects your timeline.
- Investment — one price, one line. Then payment schedule (default: 50% to start, 50% on delivery). If offering options, max 3, each with a one-line difference.
- Not included — bullet list. Be specific ("copywriting beyond headlines", "hosting fees").
- Next step — one action, one deadline ("Reply 'approved' by Friday and I'll send the invoice and kickoff slots").
Style rules
- Length: 350–600 words. Longer proposals lose decision makers.
- Second person ("you'll get"), active voice, no "we" if the user is a solo operator.
- No adjectives about the user's own work ("world-class", "innovative"). Specifics do the selling.
- Price appears once, in a sentence, not in a table of hour breakdowns — hours invite negotiation.
- Dates are absolute ("Nov 3"), never relative ("in two weeks").
- End with the next-step sentence. No "thank you for the opportunity" closers.
Output
Return the proposal as Markdown, ready to paste into a doc or email. After it, add a short Reviewer notes section (3 bullets max) flagging risks you saw in the brief: unclear scope, missing deadline, price that looks low for the deliverables.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

