rumo-interface
Skill7 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when adding, changing, deprecating, or reviewing anything another process, version, or product reads or writes, such as an HTTP/JSON endpoint or OpenAPI contract, DTO, event or queue message, protocol, configuration field, database representation, persisted file, or export. Trace every producer and consumer, define old/new compatibility and rollout order, and for HTTP routes also cover authentication, authorization, idempotency, rate limits, pagination, and response cost. Do not use for purely internal refactors with no external reader.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
every production producer and consumer: frontends, services, clients, middleware, reports, imports and exports, scripts, sibling products, …
- Distinctive: line 28
When versions overlap, expand, migrate, then contract:
- Distinctive: line 34
Remove the compatibility code only once its supported lifetime is over.
- Very specific: line 75
Not a plan: "JSON ignores unknown fields, so adding a value is compatible." Mobile 3.x throws, and the report SQL's IN (...) list silently …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Rumo Interface
Anything that crosses a process, storage, deployment-version, module, or product boundary is an interface. Change it as a contract, not as local code. Database writes themselves go through rumo-database-change-safety.
1. Inventory
Before editing, identify:
- the authority for names, types, units, nullability, defaults, enum values, identifiers, ordering, and error semantics;
- every production producer and consumer: frontends, services, clients, middleware, reports, imports and exports, scripts, sibling products, supported branches;
- everything derived from the authority: generated clients, schemas, mappers, fixtures, examples, deployment configuration, docs;
- instances that outlive one process version: stored rows, queued messages, files, caches;
- how it rolls out: atomic replacement, rolling deploy, offline upgrade, delayed workers, customer packages, mixed versions in the field.
A search is discovery, not proof of absence. Check reflection, dynamic deserialization, SQL, templates, external integrations, and deployed configuration.
2. Classify
For each producer and consumer pair, the change is one of: additive and ignored by old readers; additive but required by new readers; a meaning change to an existing field; restrictive, renamed, removed, reordered, or retyped; durable, so old stored values persist; or intentionally incompatible within a declared window. "JSON ignores unknown fields" is not compatibility: required values, enums, defaults, validation, UI assumptions, SQL projections, signatures, and side effects can still break old consumers.
3. Plan The Transition
When versions overlap, expand, migrate, then contract:
- Make readers accept both old and new shapes without changing meaning.
- Ship compatible readers before new writers.
- Switch writers and migrate stored data with bounded, observable progress.
- Confirm old producers, queued messages, files, and supported clients are drained or upgraded.
- Remove the compatibility code only once its supported lifetime is over.
To deprecate a route, field, message, or format, and only when removal is authorized: ship and document the replacement, find and notify consumers, expose the established deprecation or sunset signal, measure usage per consumer, rehearse migration and rollback, and remove only when the agreed support window and usage criteria are both met. Age alone never proves something is safe to remove; consumers you cannot observe stay recorded as unverified.
Resolve defaults in the owning parser or config layer, not in scattered null checks. Fail early and loudly on invalid referents, fields, enum values, units, or versions. Keep unknown values only when passing them through is an explicit requirement; otherwise reject them with a diagnostic that names the field without echoing sensitive content. Use opaque stable identifiers. Version durable formats whose interpretation can change: say who bumps the version, which versions each reader accepts, and whether an unsupported version fails, migrates, or opens read-only. Never reinterpret old data silently.
4. Failure And Rollback
Define error categories, partial success, retry safety, duplicate handling, and whether bad input is rejected before side effects. Put validation in one owner. Treat rollback as a matrix: can the old version read what the new one wrote, can messages be replayed, does a down-migration lose data, and when is the last safe rollback point.
5. HTTP Routes
For HTTP/JSON surfaces, read references/http.md and work through its checklist: convention, contract, compatibility with existing callers, authentication, authorization and isolation, retries and idempotency, cost and incident control, collections, response cost, errors, and leaked internals.
6. Verify The Matrix
| Producer | Consumer | Evidence |
| old | old | existing behavior still pinned |
| old | new | defaults, migration, and old stored values work |
| new | new | new meaning and invalid cases work |
| new | old | compatible, or the rollout explicitly forbids this pair |
Add invalid types, missing required values, unknown enums, boundaries, duplicate delivery, serialization round trips, reload of stored data, and rollback where they apply. Check the assembled route or artifact when generation, packaging, proxies, or deployment can differ from source tests. Plan coverage with rumo-test, and apply the high-assurance risk gate in rumo-coding-guidelines before implementation; check the final diff with rumo-verify; record a material compatibility or versioning policy with rumo-plan.
Report
The authority, producers, consumers, classification, rollout order, migration owner, failure behavior, rollback cutoff, evidence obtained, and any external or field consumer still unverified.
A plan for adding PARTIALLY_REFUNDED to the order status enum:
Authority: OrderStatus in orders/model.py; serialized as a string.
Consumers: web list filter, finance report SQL (reports/daily.sql:40), reconciliation export, mobile app 3.x.
Old readers: the web filter drops unknown values; mobile 3.x throws on an unknown status.
Rollout: ship readers that map unknown statuses to "other", wait until mobile < 3.4 is unsupported,
then enable writers; no stored rows change.
Rollback cutoff: after the first PARTIALLY_REFUNDED row exists, roll back only to a reader-compatible version.
Unverified: third-party reconciliation tool, owner not identified.Not a plan: "JSON ignores unknown fields, so adding a value is compatible." Mobile 3.x throws, and the report SQL's IN (...) list silently drops the new rows.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- rumo-agent-collaborationSkill
- rumo-clarifySkill
- rumo-coding-guidelinesSkill
- rumo-database-change-safetySkill
- rumo-debugSkill
- rumo-explainSkill
- rumo-filesystem-safetySkill
- rumo-frontendSkill
- rumo-git-commitSkill
- rumo-handoffSkill
- rumo-lifecycle-safetySkill
- rumo-planSkill
- rumo-project-profileSkill
- rumo-proseSkill
- rumo-reflectSkill
- rumo-remote-opsSkill
- rumo-reviewSkill
- rumo-setupSkill
- rumo-testSkill
- rumo-verifySkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

