open-pr
Skill1 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Open a pull request for the current branch with summary, risk, and test plan. Use when the user wants a PR, merge request, or to send work for review. Use the host CLI (gh, glab) if authenticated; otherwise print the body and push instructions.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Commits and pushes
62 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- 0xdeafcafe/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- pascalorg/editortheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPTtheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- angusfretwell/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- mongodb/docstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- elpiarthera/vantage-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use commit-push, address-review and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
DataCoveySkillcommit-push
Commit and push the changes made on this chat session to the current branch. Use best practices from Conventional Commits.
Also in 3 projects that use this
saffron-healthSkilladdress-review
Address PR review comments systematically. Use when responding to code review feedback on a pull request.
Also in 3 projects that use this
DockerSkillreview-pr
Review one or more incoming Docker documentation pull requests as a maintainer. Independently validate technical claims, assess editorial fit and information architecture, choose a verdict, and draft exact inline or PR-wide feedback behind a confirmation gate. Use for requests such as "review PR 123", "is this PR correct?", "does this information belong here?", "validate this PR", or "help review backlog PRs". Do not use to maintain or fix a PR you own; use maintain-pr for that.
Also in 10 projects that use this
HashiCorpSkillchangelog
Add a `.changelog/<PR_NUMBER>.txt` entry for a GitHub Pull Request, commit, and push.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Google CloudSkillfix
Plan a remediation strategy after a test failure.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Harut8Skillarchitect
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- rpraharaj/ai-sdlc★ 019% same
Wrote their own version · 61
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT★ 188ksame name
- storybookjs/storybook★ 91ksame name
- pascalorg/editor★ 25ksame name
- dask/dask★ 14ksame name
- polarsource/polar★ 10ksame name
- cloudflare/agents★ 6ksame name
- Kiln-AI/Kiln★ 5.3ksame name
- analogjs/analog★ 3.2ksame name
- raine/workmux★ 3ksame name
- Akylas/OSS-DocumentScanner★ 2.6ksame name
51 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- commitSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- data-changeSkill
- debugSkill
- engineering-barSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- handoffSkill
- implement-changeSkill
- incident-triageSkill
- lean-reviewSkill
- performanceSkill
- production-passSkill
- ready-to-mergeSkill
- record-decisionSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- resolve-conflictsSkill
- revert-changeSkill
- review-changeSkill
- security-passSkill
- shape-workSkill
- ship-notesSkill
- start-projectSkill
- upgrade-depsSkill
- verify-uiSkill
- write-architectureSkill
- write-designSkill
- write-dev-tasksSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-prdSkill
- write-testsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 61 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 15
If git is missing, stop.
- Distinctive: line 35
Do not open a PR from the selected default/base branch itself unless the user insisted.
- Distinctive: line 39
Write a PR/MR body from the diff (not from memory):
- Very specific: line 56
If the repo has .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or a merge_request_template, fill that template instead and still include a test plan.
- Distinctive: line 84
Do not git push --force to a shared branch.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 61 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Open PR
Publish the current branch for review. Do not merge. Do not review the whole product — describe this change.
If git is missing, stop.
Inspect
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
git status --short
git remote -v
git log -1 --onelineResolve the selected remote and actual target using engineering-bar Shared procedures for base selection and change scope. Prefer the explicit or configured target and remote default over conventional branch names. Use the recorded merge-base and tip for the PR description.
git log --oneline <merge-base>..<tip>
git diff <merge-base> <tip> --Stop if there are no commits on this branch vs the base. If the branch has uncommitted work the user likely wants in the PR, run commit first (or say it is uncommitted). If the user has not run ready-to-merge on this change, say so; do not block the PR unless they asked for a merge gate.
Do not open a PR from the selected default/base branch itself unless the user insisted.
Body
Write a PR/MR body from the diff (not from memory):
## Summary
<what changed and why, 2–6 sentences>
## Test plan
- [ ] <command you ran, or steps>
- [ ] ...
## Risk
<who/what this can break, data/compat, rollback>
## Notes
<docs or generated files updated, follow-ups, waivers>If the repo has .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md or a merge_request_template, fill that template instead and still include a test plan.
Title: match this repo's PR title style if you can see past PRs (gh pr list / glab mr list when those CLIs work). Otherwise match commit style.
Publish
Detect the host from git remote -v.
GitHub, if gh works (gh auth status succeeds):
git push -u <remote> HEAD
gh pr create --title "..." --body "..." --base <base>GitLab, if glab works:
git push -u <remote> HEAD
glab mr create --title "..." --description "..." --target-branch <base>Otherwise:
git push -u <remote> HEADif the user asked to publish and a remote exists- Print the title, body, base, and the compare URL if you can construct it from the remote
- Say which CLI was missing
Do not git push --force to a shared branch. Do not add reviewers unless the user named them.
Done
Report the PR/MR URL, or the printed body plus the push/compare instructions. List the test plan items and which of them you actually ran in this session.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

