agentleFS
ronrefaelronrefael/sonde/.claude/skills/testing-patterns/SKILL.md

testing-patterns

Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Jest testing patterns, factory functions, mocking strategies, and TDD workflow. Use when writing unit tests, creating test factories, or following TDD red-green-refactor cycle.

44 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, bash-linux and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • SKB3002Skill

    intelligent-routing

    Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • xenitV1Skill

    bash-linux

    Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • xenitV1Skill

    red-team-tactics

    Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ChrisWilesSkill

    formik-patterns

    Formik form handling with validation patterns. Use when building forms, implementing validation, or handling form submission.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SKB3002Skill

    nextjs-react-expert

    React and Next.js performance optimization from Vercel Engineering. Use when building React components, optimizing performance, eliminating waterfalls, reducing bundle size, reviewing code for performance issues, or implementing server/client-side optimizations.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • adybaSkill

    safe-workflow

    SAFe Agentic Workflow orchestrator. Teaches the full SAFe methodology adapted for AI agents: pattern discovery, exit states, quality gates, agent personas, and specs-driven development. Use when setting up a project with SAFe workflow, understanding the multi-agent methodology, or coordinating work across agent personas. Triggers: "SAFe workflow", "agent workflow", "safe harness", "specs-driven", "exit states", "quality gates", "multi-agent workflow".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +4 more from xenitV1

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 29 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write failing test FIRST

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Never write production code without a failing test

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Test behavior, not implementation

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    Avoid testing implementation details

    line 22
  5. Distinctive:

    Use descriptive test names that describe behavior

    line 23
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep tests DRY and maintainable

    line 29
  7. Distinctive:

    Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:

    line 35
  8. Distinctive:

    react-ui-patterns: Test all UI states (loading, error, empty, success)

    line 261
  9. Distinctive:

    systematic-debugging: Write test that reproduces bug before fixing

    line 262

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 29 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Testing Patterns and Utilities

Testing Philosophy

Test-Driven Development (TDD):

  • Write failing test FIRST
  • Implement minimal code to pass
  • Refactor after green
  • Never write production code without a failing test

Behavior-Driven Testing:

  • Test behavior, not implementation
  • Focus on public APIs and business requirements
  • Avoid testing implementation details
  • Use descriptive test names that describe behavior

Factory Pattern:

  • Create getMockX(overrides?: Partial<X>) functions
  • Provide sensible defaults
  • Allow overriding specific properties
  • Keep tests DRY and maintainable

Test Utilities

Custom Render Function

Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:

// src/utils/testUtils.tsx
import { render } from '@testing-library/react-native';
import { ThemeProvider } from './theme';

export const renderWithTheme = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
  return render(
    <ThemeProvider>{ui}</ThemeProvider>
  );
};

Usage:

import { renderWithTheme } from 'utils/testUtils';
import { screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';

it('should render component', () => {
  renderWithTheme(<MyComponent />);
  expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
});

Factory Pattern

Component Props Factory

import { ComponentProps } from 'react';

const getMockMyComponentProps = (
  overrides?: Partial<ComponentProps<typeof MyComponent>>
) => {
  return {
    title: 'Default Title',
    count: 0,
    onPress: jest.fn(),
    isLoading: false,
    ...overrides,
  };
};

// Usage in tests
it('should render with custom title', () => {
  const props = getMockMyComponentProps({ title: 'Custom Title' });
  renderWithTheme(<MyComponent {...props} />);
  expect(screen.getByText('Custom Title')).toBeTruthy();
});

Data Factory

interface User {
  id: string;
  name: string;
  email: string;
  role: 'admin' | 'user';
}

const getMockUser = (overrides?: Partial<User>): User => {
  return {
    id: '123',
    name: 'John Doe',
    email: 'john@example.com',
    role: 'user',
    ...overrides,
  };
};

// Usage
it('should display admin badge for admin users', () => {
  const user = getMockUser({ role: 'admin' });
  renderWithTheme(<UserCard user={user} />);
  expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeTruthy();
});

Mocking Patterns

Mocking Modules

// Mock entire module
jest.mock('utils/analytics');

// Mock with factory function
jest.mock('utils/analytics', () => ({
  Analytics: {
    logEvent: jest.fn(),
  },
}));

// Access mock in test
const mockLogEvent = jest.requireMock('utils/analytics').Analytics.logEvent;

Mocking GraphQL Hooks

jest.mock('./GetItems.generated', () => ({
  useGetItemsQuery: jest.fn(),
}));

const mockUseGetItemsQuery = jest.requireMock(
  './GetItems.generated'
).useGetItemsQuery as jest.Mock;

// In test
mockUseGetItemsQuery.mockReturnValue({
  data: { items: [] },
  loading: false,
  error: undefined,
});

Test Structure

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    jest.clearAllMocks();
  });

  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render component with default props', () => {});
    it('should render loading state when loading', () => {});
  });

  describe('User interactions', () => {
    it('should call onPress when button is clicked', async () => {});
  });

  describe('Edge cases', () => {
    it('should handle empty data gracefully', () => {});
  });
});

Query Patterns

// Element must exist
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();

// Element should not exist
expect(screen.queryByText('Goodbye')).toBeNull();

// Element appears asynchronously
await waitFor(() => {
  expect(screen.findByText('Loaded')).toBeTruthy();
});

User Interaction Patterns

import { fireEvent, screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';

it('should submit form on button click', async () => {
  const onSubmit = jest.fn();
  renderWithTheme(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />);

  fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'user@example.com');
  fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123');
  fireEvent.press(screen.getByTestId('login-button'));

  await waitFor(() => {
    expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalled();
  });
});

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Testing Mock Behavior Instead of Real Behavior

// Bad - testing the mock
expect(mockFetchData).toHaveBeenCalled();

// Good - testing actual behavior
expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeTruthy();

Not Using Factories

// Bad - duplicated, inconsistent test data
it('test 1', () => {
  const user = { id: '1', name: 'John', email: 'john@test.com', role: 'user' };
});
it('test 2', () => {
  const user = { id: '2', name: 'Jane', email: 'jane@test.com' }; // Missing role!
});

// Good - reusable factory
const user = getMockUser({ name: 'Custom Name' });

Best Practices

  1. Always use factory functions for props and data
  2. Test behavior, not implementation
  3. Use descriptive test names
  4. Organize with describe blocks
  5. Clear mocks between tests
  6. Keep tests focused - one behavior per test

Running Tests

# Run all tests
npm test

# Run with coverage
npm run test:coverage

# Run specific file
npm test ComponentName.test.tsx

Integration with Other Skills

  • react-ui-patterns: Test all UI states (loading, error, empty, success)
  • systematic-debugging: Write test that reproduces bug before fixing

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.