testing-patterns
Skill2 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Jest testing patterns, factory functions, mocking strategies, and TDD workflow. Use when writing unit tests, creating test factories, or following TDD red-green-refactor cycle.
44 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xsovad06/sovatheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gopalparashar421/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- soilmass/motion-design-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- seandkendall/kiro-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- svngoku/coding-agents-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- piomin/claude-ai-spring-boottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, bash-linux and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SKB3002Skillintelligent-routing
Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
Also in 5 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillbash-linux
Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.
Also in 6 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillred-team-tactics
Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ChrisWilesSkillformik-patterns
Formik form handling with validation patterns. Use when building forms, implementing validation, or handling form submission.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SKB3002Skillnextjs-react-expert
React and Next.js performance optimization from Vercel Engineering. Use when building React components, optimizing performance, eliminating waterfalls, reducing bundle size, reviewing code for performance issues, or implementing server/client-side optimizations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
adybaSkillsafe-workflow
SAFe Agentic Workflow orchestrator. Teaches the full SAFe methodology adapted for AI agents: pattern discovery, exit states, quality gates, agent personas, and specs-driven development. Use when setting up a project with SAFe workflow, understanding the multi-agent methodology, or coordinating work across agent personas. Triggers: "SAFe workflow", "agent workflow", "safe harness", "specs-driven", "exit states", "quality gates", "multi-agent workflow".
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from xenitV1
Other versions44 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 8
- ChrisWiles/claude-code-showcase★ 6.1k99% same
- xfstudio/skills★ 999% same
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 293% same
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 299% same
- Ghosteken/agent-harness★ 293% same
- ipoprock/claude-code-showcase★ 199% same
- whmathews15/claude-code-showcase★ 199% same
- TheHiddenDeveloper/jarvis-skills★ 093% same
Wrote their own version · 36
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- ag2ai/faststream★ 5.4ksame name
- piomin/claude-ai-spring-boot★ 1.4ksame name
- bybren-llc/safe-agentic-workflow★ 405same name
- dilolabs/nosia★ 211same name
- xenitV1/Antigravity-Workflows★ 130same name
- langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks★ 116same name
- leather-io/mono★ 28same name
- VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp★ 28same name
26 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-native-cliSkill
- api-documentationSkill
- api-security-best-practicesSkill
- architectureSkill
- bash-proSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- code-review-excellenceSkill
- debugging-strategiesSkill
- documentationSkill
- github-actions-templatesSkill
- git-pr-workflows-pr-enhanceSkill
- ios-developerSkill
- performance-optimizerSkill
- rust-async-patternsSkill
- rust-proSkill
- security-auditSkill
- swiftui-expert-skillSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 29 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Write failing test FIRST
- Distinctive: line 17
Never write production code without a failing test
- Distinctive: line 20
Test behavior, not implementation
- Distinctive: line 22
Avoid testing implementation details
- Distinctive: line 23
Use descriptive test names that describe behavior
- Distinctive: line 29
Keep tests DRY and maintainable
- Distinctive: line 35
Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:
- Distinctive: line 261
react-ui-patterns: Test all UI states (loading, error, empty, success)
- Distinctive: line 262
systematic-debugging: Write test that reproduces bug before fixing
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 29 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Testing Patterns and Utilities
Testing Philosophy
Test-Driven Development (TDD):
- Write failing test FIRST
- Implement minimal code to pass
- Refactor after green
- Never write production code without a failing test
Behavior-Driven Testing:
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Focus on public APIs and business requirements
- Avoid testing implementation details
- Use descriptive test names that describe behavior
Factory Pattern:
- Create
getMockX(overrides?: Partial<X>)functions - Provide sensible defaults
- Allow overriding specific properties
- Keep tests DRY and maintainable
Test Utilities
Custom Render Function
Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:
// src/utils/testUtils.tsx
import { render } from '@testing-library/react-native';
import { ThemeProvider } from './theme';
export const renderWithTheme = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
return render(
<ThemeProvider>{ui}</ThemeProvider>
);
};Usage:
import { renderWithTheme } from 'utils/testUtils';
import { screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should render component', () => {
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent />);
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
});Factory Pattern
Component Props Factory
import { ComponentProps } from 'react';
const getMockMyComponentProps = (
overrides?: Partial<ComponentProps<typeof MyComponent>>
) => {
return {
title: 'Default Title',
count: 0,
onPress: jest.fn(),
isLoading: false,
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage in tests
it('should render with custom title', () => {
const props = getMockMyComponentProps({ title: 'Custom Title' });
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent {...props} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Custom Title')).toBeTruthy();
});Data Factory
interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
email: string;
role: 'admin' | 'user';
}
const getMockUser = (overrides?: Partial<User>): User => {
return {
id: '123',
name: 'John Doe',
email: 'john@example.com',
role: 'user',
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage
it('should display admin badge for admin users', () => {
const user = getMockUser({ role: 'admin' });
renderWithTheme(<UserCard user={user} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeTruthy();
});Mocking Patterns
Mocking Modules
// Mock entire module
jest.mock('utils/analytics');
// Mock with factory function
jest.mock('utils/analytics', () => ({
Analytics: {
logEvent: jest.fn(),
},
}));
// Access mock in test
const mockLogEvent = jest.requireMock('utils/analytics').Analytics.logEvent;Mocking GraphQL Hooks
jest.mock('./GetItems.generated', () => ({
useGetItemsQuery: jest.fn(),
}));
const mockUseGetItemsQuery = jest.requireMock(
'./GetItems.generated'
).useGetItemsQuery as jest.Mock;
// In test
mockUseGetItemsQuery.mockReturnValue({
data: { items: [] },
loading: false,
error: undefined,
});Test Structure
describe('ComponentName', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
});
describe('Rendering', () => {
it('should render component with default props', () => {});
it('should render loading state when loading', () => {});
});
describe('User interactions', () => {
it('should call onPress when button is clicked', async () => {});
});
describe('Edge cases', () => {
it('should handle empty data gracefully', () => {});
});
});Query Patterns
// Element must exist
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
// Element should not exist
expect(screen.queryByText('Goodbye')).toBeNull();
// Element appears asynchronously
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.findByText('Loaded')).toBeTruthy();
});User Interaction Patterns
import { fireEvent, screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should submit form on button click', async () => {
const onSubmit = jest.fn();
renderWithTheme(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />);
fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'user@example.com');
fireEvent.changeText(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123');
fireEvent.press(screen.getByTestId('login-button'));
await waitFor(() => {
expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});Anti-Patterns to Avoid
Testing Mock Behavior Instead of Real Behavior
// Bad - testing the mock
expect(mockFetchData).toHaveBeenCalled();
// Good - testing actual behavior
expect(screen.getByText('John Doe')).toBeTruthy();Not Using Factories
// Bad - duplicated, inconsistent test data
it('test 1', () => {
const user = { id: '1', name: 'John', email: 'john@test.com', role: 'user' };
});
it('test 2', () => {
const user = { id: '2', name: 'Jane', email: 'jane@test.com' }; // Missing role!
});
// Good - reusable factory
const user = getMockUser({ name: 'Custom Name' });Best Practices
- Always use factory functions for props and data
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Use descriptive test names
- Organize with describe blocks
- Clear mocks between tests
- Keep tests focused - one behavior per test
Running Tests
# Run all tests
npm test
# Run with coverage
npm run test:coverage
# Run specific file
npm test ComponentName.test.tsxIntegration with Other Skills
- react-ui-patterns: Test all UI states (loading, error, empty, success)
- systematic-debugging: Write test that reproduces bug before fixing
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

