agentleFS
ronniepinnellronniepinnell/casper/skills/verdict/SKILL.md

verdict

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Append-only judgment ledger. Every DOOR / GATE / PREMORTEM / REFUTE / DRIFT verdict line gets logged to one grep-able file so "show me every gate we overrode" is a query, not archaeology. Use whenever a judgment skill produces a verdict, and to query past verdicts.

10 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    MUST name a human in by: — a model cannot accept risk on anyone's behalf.

    line 38
  2. Distinctive:

    If a project keeps decisions elsewhere (e.g.

    line 55
  3. Very specific:

    Every judgment skill (/door /gate /premortem /refute /drift /altitude /think /sweep) — they emit, this records.

    line 60

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/verdict — The Judgment Ledger

Decisions evaporate; ledgers compound. Every verdict the judgment skills produce is one line here. Six months later the ledger answers: what did we lock in, what did we override, what did we accept, and who signed it.

Invocation

/verdict log DOOR: one-way | locked: uuid pks | escape: full remap | gate: join p95
/verdict show 20          # last 20 verdicts
/verdict grep GATE        # all gate verdicts (or any pattern)
/verdict stats            # counts by type, overrides, accepted risks

Ledger location & format

File: .claude/verdicts.log in the project (create on first log; add to the repo, NOT gitignore — the ledger is the point). One line per verdict:

2026-07-09 | DOOR | one-way | locked: uuid pks | escape: full remap | by: operator
2026-07-09 | GATE | TRIPPED p95=340ms>200ms | on-fail: STOP executed | by: claude
2026-07-10 | GATE | OVERRIDE 200→400ms | reason: cold cache accepted | by: operator
2026-07-11 | REFUTE | REFUTED "search works" | broke on: unicode names | by: claude

Fields: date | TYPE | verdict | detail… | by: <who>. TYPE is one of DOOR, GATE, PREMORTEM, REFUTE, DRIFT, ALTITUDE. Overrides and risk-acceptances MUST name a human in by: — a model cannot accept risk on anyone's behalf.

Procedure

  • log — append the line verbatim (plus date + by). Never edit or delete prior lines; corrections are new lines referencing the old.
  • show / grep — read and filter; render as-is.
  • stats — counts per TYPE, number of GATE OVERRIDE lines, number of PREMORTEM accepted-risks, oldest unresolved one-way door. Flag anything suspicious plainly (e.g. "4 gate overrides in 2 weeks, all same gate — the threshold is wrong or the gate is being gamed").

Rules

  • A verdict not logged is a verdict that didn't happen. The judgment skills end by calling this.
  • The ledger is append-only. History that can be rewritten is not history.
  • If a project keeps decisions elsewhere (e.g. a decisions DB), log there TOO, but the flat file stays — it survives every infra migration.

Composes with

  • Every judgment skill (/door /gate /premortem /refute /drift /altitude /think /sweep) — they emit, this records.
  • /calibrate — reads this ledger to score how past confidence aged.
  • /precedent — greps this ledger as its primary store of prior rulings.
  • /escalate — every queue adjudication lands here; the ledger feeds future precedent.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.