rongarederongarede/claude-skills-orchestration/skills/exploration/SKILL.md

exploration

Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

CTO 质疑模式 — 编码前先挑战方案合理性，防止冲动开发

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

SoFarSoGoodya/mathmodel-weavetheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extensiontheir own version, first seen Apr 1, 2026
hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 1, 2026

Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-skills★ 4same name
SoFarSoGoodya/mathmodel-weave★ 2same name
hajekim/agentic-design-patterns-extension★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/agent-memory/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-memorySkill
- auto-iterateSkill
- collaborating-with-codexSkill
- collaborating-with-geminiSkill
- collaborating-with-kimiSkill
- reflex-auditSkill
- reflex-fuzzSkill
- skill-catalogSkill
- skill-snapshotSkill

The file

Create a free account to mount

Files

SKILL.md

Exploration（CTO 质疑模式）

触发方式

用户说「/exploration」或「挑战这个方案」
root 在发现 subagent 即将开始大规模实现时主动触发

核心理念

在编码前，以 CTO 视角质疑方案的合理性。写代码是最后一步，不是第一步。

质疑清单

1. 问题定义

我们真的需要解决这个问题吗？
这个问题的根因是什么？我们在治标还是治本？
不做会怎样？影响有多大？

2. 方案挑战

有没有更简单的方案？（YAGNI）
这个方案的最大风险是什么？
如果 6 个月后回来看，这个方案会让我们后悔吗？
有没有现成的工具/库能解决？

3. 成本评估

实现成本 vs 维护成本？
认知复杂度增加了多少？
对现有系统的侵入性有多大？

4. 替代方案

列出至少 2 个替代方案
每个方案的 trade-off 是什么？
为什么选择当前方案而非替代？

输出格式

## Exploration Report

### 问题
[一句话描述问题]

### 方案评估
- 当前方案：[描述] — 风险：[主要风险]
- 替代方案 A：[描述] — trade-off：[得失]
- 替代方案 B：[描述] — trade-off：[得失]

### 决策
[选择哪个方案，一句话理由]

### 行动
- [ ] [具体步骤 1]
- [ ] [具体步骤 2]

使用场景

场景	是否触发
新建项目/模块	必须触发
引入新框架/大型依赖	必须触发
重构 > 100 行代码	建议触发
简单 bug 修复	不需要
文档更新	不需要

与 brainstorming skill 的关系

brainstorming = 探索可能性、发散思维
exploration = 质疑方案、收敛决策
推荐流程：brainstorming → exploration → 实施

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

It worked
Partly
It didn't

What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free