agentleFS
ronaldshipsronaldships/foundvia-discovery/skills/seo-technical/SKILL.md

seo-technical

Skill29 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub

Diagnose crawl access, HTTP responses, canonicals, sitemaps, rendering, and Core Web Vitals using observed site evidence. Use for technical indexing or performance problems; use seo-on-page for copy and seo-analytics for a traffic-loss investigation.

38 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use seo-agentic, seo-maps and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AgriciDanielSkill

    seo-agentic

    Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • timruebenachSkill

    seo-maps

    Maps intelligence for local SEO — geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification (Google/Bing/Apple/OSM), competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation from API data. Three-tier capability: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO (full intelligence), DataForSEO + Google (maximum coverage). Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", "maps analysis", "local rank tracking", "Share of Local Voice", or "SoLV".

    Also in 17 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-sitemap

    Analyze existing XML sitemaps or generate new ones with industry templates. Validates format, URLs, and structure. Use when user says "sitemap", "generate sitemap", "sitemap issues", or "XML sitemap".

    Also in 29 projects that use this

  • timruebenachSkill

    seo-ecommerce

    E-commerce SEO analysis: Google Shopping visibility, Amazon marketplace intelligence, product schema validation, competitor pricing analysis, and marketplace keyword gaps. Combines on-page product SEO with marketplace data from DataForSEO Merchant API. Use when user says "ecommerce SEO", "product SEO", "Google Shopping", "marketplace SEO", "product schema", "Amazon SEO", "product listings", "shopping ads", or "merchant SEO".

    Also in 17 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-images

    Image optimization analysis for SEO and performance. Checks alt text, file sizes, formats, responsive images, lazy loading, and CLS prevention. Use when user says "image optimization", "alt text", "image SEO", "image size", or "image audit".

    Also in 25 projects that use this

  • mangollcSkill

    seo-backlinks

    Backlink analysis and link building strategy: competitor backlink profiling, outreach plan generation, monthly SEO reporting framework, toxic link identification, link opportunity scoring, and unlinked mention discovery.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • +3 more from timruebenach
  • +3 more from megastep

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 35 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Check sitemap URLs against real public routes.

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    Read crawlability, performance, or security only for the relevant investigation.

    line 25

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 35 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Technical discovery diagnosis

Establish evidence

Inspect the supplied URL, intended public/private state, actual framework/version, and authorized Search Console history. Fetch initial HTML, robots.txt, response headers, and sitemap; use the Foundvia helper for a bounded preflight. If JavaScript changes the output, compare rendered HTML. A tool failure is not proof of a site failure.

Investigate in order

  1. Confirm status and redirect destination. Preserve intentional authentication and private routes.
  2. Distinguish a crawler prohibition from noindex. A blocked crawler cannot read a new noindex directive. Evaluate Googlebot and OAI-SearchBot independently; preserve GPTBot training policy.
  3. Compare declared canonical with the intended page and, where available, Google's selected canonical. Query parameters may represent distinct content. Do not canonicalize all child routes to the homepage.
  4. Check sitemap URLs against real public routes; include truthful lastmod only. A sitemap is a discovery hint, not proof of indexing.
  5. Inspect rendered content and crawlable links. Do not block framework assets such as /_next/ by default.
  6. For performance, use field data and a reproducible profile to locate the actual bottleneck. A laboratory score is not a real-user pass. Security headers protect users; do not present HSTS/CSP as ranking requirements.

Fix and verify

Report URL/file, evidence, consequence, priority, action, and verification. Change code only within the user's scope; check affected routes and the existing build/typecheck. Distinguish local fixes, deployment, and live verification. Do not promise recrawl timing or rank changes.

Read crawlability, performance, or security only for the relevant investigation. Source: Google robots specification.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.