open-pr
Skill43 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Stage, commit, push, and open a pull request following the author's repository and AGENTS.md conventions — repo-style commit messages, a prose PR summary, and a Testing Done command list. Use when work is finished and the caller wants it committed and a PR opened. Supports --draft and an optional local review before push.
- Commits and pushes
62 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- 0xdeafcafe/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- pascalorg/editortheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPTtheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- angusfretwell/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- mongodb/docstheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- elpiarthera/vantage-startertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use review-change, commit-push and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
thlaureSkillreview-change
Use this skill when the user asks for a code review, a correctness pass, a check before PR, or asks whether a Signalist change follows project conventions.
Also in 4 projects that use this
DataCoveySkillcommit-push
Commit and push the changes made on this chat session to the current branch. Use best practices from Conventional Commits.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Codagent-AISkillimplement-change
Implements an approved change in one continuous session, with tiered test runs. Use when asked to implement a change from its approved definition, or to invoke codagent:implement-change.
Also in 3 projects that use this
saffron-healthSkilladdress-review
Address PR review comments systematically. Use when responding to code review feedback on a pull request.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillwrite-tests
Write tests following project conventions. Use when adding new tests or modifying existing ones.
Also in 4 projects that use this
HashiCorpSkillchangelog
Add a `.changelog/<PR_NUMBER>.txt` entry for a GitHub Pull Request, commit, and push.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions62 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 62
- Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT★ 188ksame name
- storybookjs/storybook★ 91ksame name
- pascalorg/editor★ 25ksame name
- dask/dask★ 14ksame name
- polarsource/polar★ 10ksame name
- cloudflare/agents★ 6ksame name
- Kiln-AI/Kiln★ 5.3ksame name
- analogjs/analog★ 3.2ksame name
- raine/workmux★ 3ksame name
- Akylas/OSS-DocumentScanner★ 2.6ksame name
52 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- build-write-like-meSkill
- clarifySkill
- commitSkill
- deliver-prSkill
- exploreSkill
- implementSkill
- planSkill
- pr-fixSkill
- pr-monitorSkill
- rebaseSkill
- relay-archiveSkill
- relay-statusSkill
- review-prSkill
- reviewSkill
- simplifySkill
- stack-shipSkill
- tlSkill
- todoSkill
- validateSkill
- write-like-meSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 61 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Branch-if-on-default gate: Never commit straight onto the default branch.
- Very specific: line 36
Use the runtime-provided model identity when available, and the agent's verified no-reply identity for the email.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 61 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Open PR
Take finished work from working tree to open pull request: stage specific files, commit with a
repo-style message, push, and open the PR in the author's house style. Read <repo>/AGENTS.md and
~/.config/agents/AGENTS.md first (repo-specific rules win) and follow those preferences for commit
messages and PR descriptions. Execute git/gh operations through this skill's bundled
scripts/open-pr.sh helper rather than inlining command sequences in the skill.
Flags
--draft— open the PR as a draft (gh pr create --draft). Default is open (ready for review).--no-review— skip the optional local review before push.
Process
- Branch-if-on-default gate. Never commit straight onto the default branch. Invoke the helper's
ensure-branch <slug>command. It hard-fails if the default branch cannot be detected and, when a new branch is needed, reads the branch prefix from the first-timerelayconfig (relay config branch-prefix) rather than hardcoding a personal prefix. - Stage specific files. Invoke the helper's
statuscommand, then itsstage -- <files...>command for exactly what belongs in this change — never stage the whole tree. Confirm the diff carries no secrets and no formatting churn mixed in with behavior. - Commit in the repo's style. Match the repository's recent commit style and the AGENTS.md
preferences. Do not force Conventional Commits unless the repo already uses them. The subject should
lead with what changed; include a body only when useful, and make it explain why the change exists
rather than restating the diff. Keep refactor commits separate from feature/fix commits (split with
separate
stage/commithelper calls if both are present). End every message with aCo-authored-bytrailer for the actual model/agent currently doing the work; never hardcode a model. Use the runtime-provided model identity when available, and the agent's verified no-reply identity for the email. Then invoke the helper'scommit <message-file>command. - Local review before push (skip with
--no-review). Review the full diff from the helper'sdiffcommand for correctness and leftover debris before it leaves your machine. Dispatch thereviewskill as a sub-agent when available; otherwise scan it inline. - Push. Invoke the helper's
pushcommand. - Prefer the repo's PR template. Fetch it and fill each section from the actual change; only fall
back to the body in step 7 when none exists. Use the helper's
pr-templatecommand to fetch it. - Open the PR. Title follows the repo's PR-title style. Body follows AGENTS.md: one or two short
prose paragraphs focused on why/what, no bullet list, no per-file walkthrough, and a
Testing Donesection containing only the commands run. Disclose automated authorship with the actual agent/model used, not a hardcoded Claude footer. Add--draftto the helper call only when the caller passed it, and invokecreate-pr --title <title> --body-file <body-file>. - Return the PR URL that
gh pr createprints, to the caller.
PR body conventions
The body format is in step 7; the red flags and checklist below guard it. The one rule not covered there:
- Disclose agent authorship in any PR comment you post — mark it as written by an automated agent on the author's behalf; never phrase it as the author's own words.
Red flags
- Committing onto the default branch instead of branching first.
git add ./git add -Ainstead of staging the specific files.- A PR summary that is a bullet list, or that enumerates each file/caller and how the code works.
- A
Testing Donesection padded with prose or per-command descriptions instead of bare commands. - Refactor squashed into the same commit as a feature/fix; formatting churn mixed with behavior.
- A commit body that restates the diff ("what") instead of the reason ("why").
- Hand-rolling a body when the repo ships a PR template; assuming
main/masteras the base. - Missing the actual-model
Co-authored-bytrailer or automated-authorship disclosure.
Verification checklist
HEADis on a branch using the configuredrelaybranch prefix, not the default branch.- Only the intended files were staged (no
git add .); diff has no secrets or stray formatting. - Commit message matches repo/AGENTS.md style, includes the actual-model
Co-authored-bytrailer, and keeps refactor separate. - PR summary is 1–2 prose paragraphs on why/what — not bullets, not a file-by-file how.
Testing Doneis just the list of commands run; body discloses the actual automated agent/model.- Repo PR template used when present; base branch detected dynamically;
--draftapplied only if requested. - The PR URL was returned to the caller.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

