checkpoint
Skill9 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Save work in progress to a remote branch and keep working. Never touches main and never deploys; if invoked on main it moves the work to a new branch first. Use when asked to checkpoint, save progress, back this up, or push to the branch.
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
91 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- TheLunchTrae/claude-code-configstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- flonat/flonat-researchtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- jboczek/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AhmedMerza/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use aside, spinoff and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
TheKREATORSSkillaside
Answer a quick side question without interrupting or losing context from the current task. Resume work automatically after answering.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AhmedMerzaSkillspinoff
After a branch is finished, harvest the work it made CHEAP — the helper you wrote that four other sites now hand-roll, the plumbing that turned a deferred feature small, the pattern that just split the codebase in two. Produces a follow-up backlog (0–3 candidates, feeding /issue), NEVER commits on the current branch. Invoke with /spinoff at the tail of the chain — after /fix-review has settled the review findings, before the MR merges — or when the user asks \"what else should we do while we're here / what did this unlock / anything to follow up on\". This is ship-check's optional twin — that finds what's MISSING and blocks the merge; this finds what's now CHEAP and blocks nothing. Restraint-gated: \"nothing spun off\" is the common and correct answer, and a finding that would have been equally valid before this branch is not a finding.
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 5 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 5 projects that use this
seek888Skilldesign-html
Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +2 more from TheKREATORS
- +2 more from seek888
Other versions91 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- robritacca-dotcom/design-system★ 194% same
Wrote their own version · 90
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- leonvanzyl/agentic-coding-starter-kit★ 447same name
- myICOR/myPKA★ 319same name
- hsantanna88/clo-author★ 262same name
- hugosantanna/clo-author★ 262same name
- sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands★ 200same name
- flonat/flonat-research★ 150same name
- josipjelic/orchestrated-project-template★ 96same name
- panayiotism/claude-harness★ 79same name
80 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-auditSkill
- animation-jump-checkSkill
- api-consistencySkill
- chat-qualitySkill
- component-consistency-auditSkill
- component-doc-pageSkill
- content-auditSkill
- dependency-advisorySkill
- design-qaSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- drift-auditSkill
- first-deploySkill
- landSkill
- link-rotSkill
- new-componentSkill
- new-pageSkill
- new-presetSkill
- new-templateSkill
- new-tokenSkill
- new-validatorSkill
- parkSkill
- pre-deploySkill
- release-postSkill
- releaseSkill
- responsive-sweepSkill
- security-auditSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- shipSkill
- super-shipSkill
- token-auditSkill
- token-renameSkill
- visual-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 85 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 15
Use this skill when asked to save unfinished work — phrases like "checkpoint", "save my progress", "back this up", "push to the branch".
- Distinctive: line 22
On a work branch: commit and push there (steps 2–5).
- Distinctive: line 36
Every file deliberately left out and why
- Distinctive: line 41
Never touch main: no commits to it, no merges into it, no pushes of it
- Distinctive: line 42
Never force-push, never rewrite pushed history
- Very specific: line 43
Never commit .env* or anything credential-shaped — even if explicitly staged by mistake
- Distinctive: line 44
If there is nothing in scope to commit, say so and stop — don't invent a commit
- Very specific: line 45
Never chain into ship automatically — going live is always a separate, explicit ask
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 85 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
checkpoint
Save the session's work-in-progress to a remote branch, then keep working on it. Nothing merges, nothing deploys, main is never touched. The end state: the work is safely on GitHub and the session stays on the branch.
When invoked
Use this skill when asked to save unfinished work — phrases like "checkpoint", "save my progress", "back this up", "push to the branch". When the work is finished and should go live, that's ship; to save and stop working on it, that's park.
If asked to "merge and push": that's the retired ambiguous skill name, and it now maps onto more than one verb. Confirm the intended end state before doing anything: ship (merge into main, push, deploy), checkpoint (push the branch, keep working), or land (combine several pieces of pending work into a local main, pushing nothing).
Instructions
- Check the branch:
git branch --show-current.- On a work branch: commit and push there (steps 2–5).
- On
main: move the work to a branch first — there is no "push to main but don't deploy", because a push tomaindeploys the live site (SITE_URLinscripts/brand.mjsis the authority). Create a branch named for the work, not the date:git checkout -b wip/<short-topic>(e.g.wip/nav-search,wip/chart-tokens). Uncommitted changes ride along automatically. Never commit directly tomainfrom this skill.
- Survey the tree: run
git status --shortand classify every entry as in scope (this session's work) or out of scope (predates the session or wasn't part of the requested work). Never rungit add -A,git add ., orgit addon a directory — always add explicit file paths. Out-of-scope files stay out and are named in the report. - Quick check, not the full verify: run
npm run lint; if the session touchedwebsite/, also runnpm --prefix website run lint(root ESLint ignores the website workspace, so the root lint alone carries no signal about website work). This is a backup, not a release — the fullverify(several minutes) isship's job. A lint failure does not block the push: the whole point is that the work is saved even mid-mess. But flag any failure loudly in the report so it isn't a surprise at ship time. - Commit in the repo's conventional style (
feat(scope):,fix(scope):,chore(scope):, with a short why in the body) — checkpoint commits eventually reachmainthrough a merge, so they are real history, not throwaways. One commit is fine if the work is one concern; split if it's clearly several. - Push the branch:
git push -u origin <branch>(same-named remote branch). Pushing a branch publishes nothing — no deploy, no site change. - Stay on the branch and report:
- The branch name and each commit (hash + subject)
- Lint status, including any failure being flagged rather than fixed
- Every file deliberately left out and why
- The closing line: work is backed up, session continues on the branch; say
shipwhen it should go live,parkto set it aside
Guardrails
- Never touch
main: no commits to it, no merges into it, no pushes of it - Never force-push, never rewrite pushed history
- Never commit
.env*or anything credential-shaped — even if explicitly staged by mistake - If there is nothing in scope to commit, say so and stop — don't invent a commit
- Never chain into
shipautomatically — going live is always a separate, explicit ask
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

