agentleFS
robritacca-dotcomrobritacca-dotcom/rift-ds/.claude/skills/checkpoint/SKILL.md

checkpoint

Skill9 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

Save work in progress to a remote branch and keep working. Never touches main and never deploys; if invoked on main it moves the work to a new branch first. Use when asked to checkpoint, save progress, back this up, or push to the branch.

  • Reads credentials
  • Commits and pushes

91 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use aside, spinoff and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheKREATORSSkill

    aside

    Answer a quick side question without interrupting or losing context from the current task. Resume work automatically after answering.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AhmedMerzaSkill

    spinoff

    After a branch is finished, harvest the work it made CHEAP — the helper you wrote that four other sites now hand-roll, the plumbing that turned a deferred feature small, the pattern that just split the codebase in two. Produces a follow-up backlog (0–3 candidates, feeding /issue), NEVER commits on the current branch. Invoke with /spinoff at the tail of the chain — after /fix-review has settled the review findings, before the MR merges — or when the user asks \"what else should we do while we're here / what did this unlock / anything to follow up on\". This is ship-check's optional twin — that finds what's MISSING and blocks the merge; this finds what's now CHEAP and blocks nothing. Restraint-gated: \"nothing spun off\" is the common and correct answer, and a finding that would have been equally valid before this branch is not a finding.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • TheKREATORSSkill

    instinct-export

    Export instincts from project/global scope to a file

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    open-gstack-browser

    Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • diego-tobalinaSkill

    build-fix

    Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    design-html

    Design finalization: generates production-quality Pretext-native HTML/CSS. Works with approved mockups from /design-shotgun, CEO plans from /plan-ceo-review, design review context from /plan-design-review, or from scratch with a user description. Text actually reflows, heights are computed, layouts are dynamic. 30KB overhead, zero deps. Smart API routing: picks the right Pretext patterns for each design type. Use when: "finalize this design", "turn this into HTML", "build me a page", "implement this design", or after any planning skill. Proactively suggest when user has approved a design or has a plan ready. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "build the design", "code the mockup", "make it real".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +2 more from TheKREATORS
  • +2 more from seek888

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 85 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill when asked to save unfinished work — phrases like "checkpoint", "save my progress", "back this up", "push to the branch".

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    On a work branch: commit and push there (steps 2–5).

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    Every file deliberately left out and why

    line 36
  4. Distinctive:

    Never touch main: no commits to it, no merges into it, no pushes of it

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    Never force-push, never rewrite pushed history

    line 42
  6. Very specific:

    Never commit .env* or anything credential-shaped — even if explicitly staged by mistake

    line 43
  7. Distinctive:

    If there is nothing in scope to commit, say so and stop — don't invent a commit

    line 44
  8. Very specific:

    Never chain into ship automatically — going live is always a separate, explicit ask

    line 45

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 85 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

checkpoint

Save the session's work-in-progress to a remote branch, then keep working on it. Nothing merges, nothing deploys, main is never touched. The end state: the work is safely on GitHub and the session stays on the branch.

When invoked

Use this skill when asked to save unfinished work — phrases like "checkpoint", "save my progress", "back this up", "push to the branch". When the work is finished and should go live, that's ship; to save and stop working on it, that's park.

If asked to "merge and push": that's the retired ambiguous skill name, and it now maps onto more than one verb. Confirm the intended end state before doing anything: ship (merge into main, push, deploy), checkpoint (push the branch, keep working), or land (combine several pieces of pending work into a local main, pushing nothing).

Instructions

  1. Check the branch: git branch --show-current.
    • On a work branch: commit and push there (steps 2–5).
    • On main: move the work to a branch first — there is no "push to main but don't deploy", because a push to main deploys the live site (SITE_URL in scripts/brand.mjs is the authority). Create a branch named for the work, not the date: git checkout -b wip/<short-topic> (e.g. wip/nav-search, wip/chart-tokens). Uncommitted changes ride along automatically. Never commit directly to main from this skill.
  2. Survey the tree: run git status --short and classify every entry as in scope (this session's work) or out of scope (predates the session or wasn't part of the requested work). Never run git add -A, git add ., or git add on a directory — always add explicit file paths. Out-of-scope files stay out and are named in the report.
  3. Quick check, not the full verify: run npm run lint; if the session touched website/, also run npm --prefix website run lint (root ESLint ignores the website workspace, so the root lint alone carries no signal about website work). This is a backup, not a release — the full verify (several minutes) is ship's job. A lint failure does not block the push: the whole point is that the work is saved even mid-mess. But flag any failure loudly in the report so it isn't a surprise at ship time.
  4. Commit in the repo's conventional style (feat(scope):, fix(scope):, chore(scope):, with a short why in the body) — checkpoint commits eventually reach main through a merge, so they are real history, not throwaways. One commit is fine if the work is one concern; split if it's clearly several.
  5. Push the branch: git push -u origin <branch> (same-named remote branch). Pushing a branch publishes nothing — no deploy, no site change.
  6. Stay on the branch and report:
    • The branch name and each commit (hash + subject)
    • Lint status, including any failure being flagged rather than fixed
    • Every file deliberately left out and why
    • The closing line: work is backed up, session continues on the branch; say ship when it should go live, park to set it aside

Guardrails

  • Never touch main: no commits to it, no merges into it, no pushes of it
  • Never force-push, never rewrite pushed history
  • Never commit .env* or anything credential-shaped — even if explicitly staged by mistake
  • If there is nothing in scope to commit, say so and stop — don't invent a commit
  • Never chain into ship automatically — going live is always a separate, explicit ask

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.