sol-loop
Skill4.5k starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review a change in rounds with GPT 6.1 Sol as a separate reviewer until it approves or the budget runs out. Use when the user says "sol loop" or asks for a Sol review loop before shipping.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 2 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
2
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 14
Stop early if a round returns only nits.
- Common: line 16
Keep a ledger: id, severity, outcome, usage if returned.
- Distinctive: line 20
Run git status --short. Never stash, discard, or include unrelated changes.
- Distinctive: line 35
If no route reaches Sol, stop and tell the user.
- Distinctive: line 37
Do not edit scoped files while Sol runs.
- Distinctive: line 57
Check each finding and severity yourself.
- Very specific: line 63
Update the ledger. Re-run checks and git diff --shortstat <base>.
- Distinctive: line 73
Never push during the loop.
- Very specific: line 77
Add on <effort> only if verified.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
sol-loop
GPT 6.1 Sol reviews your change in rounds. Make the smallest changes that answer it, avoid scope creep, and push back when it is wrong.
Budget
- 3 rounds. Round 1 is full; later rounds check only changed code and open findings.
- 5 only if the user asks, or for security, permissions, auth, data loss, or state/concurrency while a blocker or should stays open with evidence.
- Stop early if a round returns only nits. Declined nits and comment, doc, or format-only fixes need no new round.
- One reviewer only. Sol must not start subagents or reviewers.
- Keep a ledger: id, severity, outcome, usage if returned. Never guess usage.
1. Scope
Run git status --short. Never stash, discard, or include unrelated changes; if they don't separate cleanly by path, stop and ask.
After git fetch origin, base is git merge-base HEAD origin/<PR base or default branch>. For a PR, HEAD must be the PR head or ahead only by this change. No remote: a base the user names, or HEAD for uncommitted changes only. The change is base to working tree, untracked files included; use the same diff every round.
State intent and out-of-scope in 1-2 sentences. Run the covering checks (swift build, script/test_quiet.sh --filter <Suite>); never send code the change breaks. Note missing or already-failing checks in the brief.
2. Start Sol
The reviewer is GPT 6.1 Sol, unless the user names another Sol version. Reach it the way your harness allows:
- Capy: a subagent or thread on model
openai/gpt-6.1-sol; keep its path or code for later rounds. - Cursor: a background agent or new chat with GPT 6.1 Sol selected.
- Claude Code and other harnesses without GPT models: Codex CLI,
codex exec -m gpt-6.1-sol -with the brief on stdin (read-only sandbox by default). Note the session id it prints;codex exec resume <SESSION_ID>continues it. - Anything else: give the user the brief to run in a Sol session and wait for the reply.
If no route reaches Sol, stop and tell the user. Never substitute another model, and never count a self-review as a round. Record provider, model, and effort only if your harness shows them.
Do not edit scoped files while Sol runs. Wait for the result; do not poll or start a second reviewer. A timeout, error, or no reply is not approval. On failure, cancel, confirm it stopped, and restart with the ledger.
Round 1 brief (Sol has none of your context):
Review only. Do not edit, commit, push, comment on PRs, or start subagents.
Repo: <abs path> Base: <sha> Intent: <intent> Out of scope: <scope> Checks: <results>
See: git diff <base> [-- <paths>]; git status --short (read untracked).
Read surrounding code. Find bugs, broken callers, mismatch with intent.
Skip style unless it hides a bug. Hold to the smallest change. Flag code,
tests, or guards the intent does not need. Other paths, rare cases, small
perf, extra compat: nits.
blocker = intended case wrong. should = real bug callers will hit, in intent. nit = rest.
Reply:
VERDICT: APPROVE or CHANGES
S1 [blocker|should|nit] <file>:<line> <claim>. Fix: <suggestion> (stable ids)3. Answer findings
Check each finding and severity yourself; another path, rare case, or small cost is a nit whatever its label.
- Agree: smallest fix, preferring delete or narrow over a new lock, cache, helper, or option. Fix the case that happened. One focused test that fails without the fix, if the intent needs it.
- Disagree: say why with evidence (file:line, test, output).
- Out of scope or nit: decline in one line, list as follow-up.
Update the ledger. Re-run checks and git diff --shortstat <base>; if review grew the diff, cut first. Never agree just to end the loop.
4. Next round
Only if budget remains and a blocker or should is open, behavior code changed, or approval does not cover the current behavior diff. Follow up the same Sol session, or start a fresh one. Send the round 1 brief, the ledger (fixed: / disagree: / declined: with evidence), the same base diff, and the change since last round. Tell Sol: open ids and changed code only, marking each old id resolved or still open: <reason>.
5. Stop and ship
Agreed: APPROVE on the current behavior diff, no blocker or should open, no concern of your own. Stuck: an item disputed after two replies, or budget spent; show both sides in 2-3 lines each and let the user decide. Budget end is not approval.
Never push during the loop; after agreement, push only if the user asked to push, ship, or update the PR. On a PR, add to the description:
Reviewed with sol-loop: <N> rounds with GPT 6.1 Sol. Sol verdict: approved
Add on <effort> only if verified.
Report: rounds with GPT 6.1 Sol, what Sol changed, diff size before and after, fixed and declined findings with reasons, usage if shown (else say not), pushed or not.
Adapted from sol-loop in t3dotgg/tstack (MIT, Copyright (c) 2026 Theo Browne).
Trending
More talk lately.about the whole repository
Who's talking about robinebers/openusage
- A Hacker News story“OpenUsage: Track all your AI usage, in one panel”Hacker News · Apr 30, 2026 · 2 points
- @github-trending-js.bsky.social“📦 robinebers / openusage ⭐ 1,831 (+53) 🗒 JavaScript Burning through your subscriptions too fast? Paying …”Bluesky · Apr 12, 2026 · 1 likes
- @mikestaub2.bsky.social“This is a useful too to track your AI agent usage: github.com/robinebers/o...”Bluesky · Feb 3, 2026 · 1 likes
- konste/tanks“Upstream OpenUsage v0.7.16 released — update the fork”GitHub · Oct 26, 2026
- sudosubin/agents.nix“agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: 0.7.15 → 0.7.16”GitHub · Oct 26, 2026
The biggest 5 of 40 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 40
Talked about on GitHub, Bluesky and Hacker News (40 times).
On GitHub · 37
- Oct 26, 2026Upstream OpenUsage v0.7.16 released — update the fork — konste/tanks0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 26, 2026agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: 0.7.15 → 0.7.16 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 22, 2026Improve quota reliability, customization, alerts and account support — meengi07/chiikawa-agent-pet0 reactions · 4 comments
- Oct 21, 2026Restless: menu bar panel, new name and icon, signed builds and Sparkle updates — notkainoa/restless0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 19, 2026Upstream OpenUsage v0.7.15 released — update the fork — konste/tanks0 reactions · 1 comment
32 more on GitHub
- Oct 18, 2026agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: 0.7.14 → 0.7.15 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2026GitHub Copilot — kota takibi — erayendes/mimir0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2026Cursor — kullanım ve harcama takibi — erayendes/mimir0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2026feat: common code backend? — vinzdg/codenotch0 reactions
- Oct 10, 2026Proper claude backoffs to avoid rate limiting — vinzdg/codenotch0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026Upstream OpenUsage v0.7.14 released — update the fork — konste/tanks0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 6, 2026agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: 0.7.13 → 0.7.14 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026Upstream OpenUsage v0.7.13 released — update the fork — konste/tanks0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 5, 2026Upstream openusage: cambios en proveedores — XusBadia/altillo0 reactions · 3 comments
- Oct 3, 2026agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: 0.7.12 → 0.7.13 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Oct 3, 2026Z.ai GLM Coding Plan detected but usage resources are empty — LuigiElleBalotta/AIUsage.NET0 reactions
- Oct 1, 2026agent-skills.github.robinebers.openusage: init at 0.7.12 — sudosubin/agents.nix0 reactions
- Sep 26, 2026[quota-watch] 2026-09-26 — Claude'un oauth/usage'ı artık User-Agent'a göre dallanıyor (cedar_ember); Codex refresh token'ının tek kullanımlık olduğu doğrulandı — erayendes/mimir0 reactions · 1 comment
- Sep 24, 2026usage API が 429 を返し続けると、入札も回復待ちの判定も効かなくなり、自動の着手が止まり、走っている run も stall として止められうる — maimuzo/continuo0 reactions · 130 comments
- Sep 19, 2026[quota-watch] 2026-09-19 — Claude CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR hiç okunmuyor; Codex kendi auth.json'a token yazıyor; yeni bir oauth/profile ucu var — erayendes/mimir0 reactions · 4 comments
- Sep 16, 2026feat(cursor): Cursor card — plan usage by session token — Rast53/usage-board0 reactions · 2 comments
- Sep 13, 2026[P2][RELIABILITY][DOCUMENTATION] Complete or retire the expired Prometheus counter migration — Reese-max/lobsterpulse0 reactions · 2 comments
- Sep 9, 2026feat(muse) - Add muse-code from Meta as provider — janekbaraniewski/openusage0 reactions · 5 comments
- Sep 5, 2026[quota-watch] 2026-09-05 — Antigravity grup-kota alan adları iki bağımsız rakipte doğrulandı; Claude web endpoint'i Cloudflare engeline takılabiliyor — erayendes/mimir0 reactions · 1 comment
- Aug 29, 2026[quota-watch] 2026-08-29 — Codex 5 saatlik pencere Plus için canlıya geçti; Antigravity grup-kota alan adlarında olası uyuşmazlık — erayendes/mimir0 reactions · 3 comments
- Aug 28, 2026feat(providers): add grok quota monitoring — medokin/ReservePane0 reactions
- Aug 26, 2026feat(providers): add OpenCode Go quota monitoring — medokin/ReservePane0 reactions
- Aug 13, 2026Document OpenCode Go Rate limits from GET /zen/go/v1/usage — lidge-jun/opencodex0 reactions · 4 comments
- Aug 10, 2026[quota-watch] 2026-08-10 — Antigravity: olası app/bundle adı değişikliği ve RetrieveUserQuotaSummary'de auth race raporu (düşük güven) — erayendes/mimir0 reactions · 3 comments
- Aug 4, 2026feat(ai): add Cursor personal usage reporting — can1357/oh-my-pi0 reactions
- Jul 13, 2026openusage: 0.6.13 -> 0.7.5, add Br1ght0ne to maintainers — NixOS/nixpkgs0 reactions
- Jun 26, 2026Wire SQLite reader into getSummary() to fix usage accuracy drift (#23 root cause) — ltmoerdani/opencode-copilot-chat0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 30, 2026[feature]: Opencode Go without workspace ID and auth cookie — slkiser/opencode-quota0 reactions · 4 comments
- Apr 10, 2026Upstream merge — Rana-Faraz/usage-tray-windows0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 7, 2026limit what provider models show up (includes PR) — Rana-Faraz/usage-tray-windows0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 5, 2026openusage: init at 0.6.13 — NixOS/nixpkgs0 reactions · 2 comments
- Feb 8, 2026[FEATURE]: OpenUsage in OpenCode — anomalyco/opencode0 reactions · 7 comments
On Bluesky · 2
- Apr 12, 2026📦 robinebers / openusage ⭐ 1,831 (+53) 🗒 JavaScript Burning through your subscriptions too fast? Paying for stuff you never use? Stop… — @github-trending-js.bsky.social1 likes and repost
- Feb 3, 2026This is a useful too to track your AI agent usage: github.com/robinebers/o... — @mikestaub2.bsky.social1 likes and repost
On Hacker News · 1
- Apr 30, 2026OpenUsage: Track all your AI usage, in one panel2 points
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 6
- t3dotgg/tstack★ 2.5k46% same
- connorch/skills★ 239% same
- Dhruv2mars/skills★ 233% same
- johnnygreco/skills★ 146% same
- luisgui1757/sentinel★ 042% same
- shubrt/skills★ 046% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- salalaslam/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use leaving-pr-comments, full-stop and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Dhruv2marsSkillleaving-pr-comments
Format and post agent-authored GitHub pull request
Also in 6 projects that use this
Nexus-Organization-InfosecSkillfull-stop
Shut down the Full Control phone-bridge completely — end Claude's watch loop, stop the bridge server (server.py started via ensure_server.ps1), and mark Claude offline in the app. Use whenever the user invokes /full-stop or says "stop full control", "stop the watch loop", "shut down the bridge/server", or "stop the ps1". Counterpart of [[full-control]], which starts everything.
Also in 6 projects that use this
shhacSkillfull-send
Complete an explicitly assigned task autonomously through parallel agents, peer-reviewed decisions, and automatic retries of temporary blockers. Use only when the user explicitly invokes Full Send.
Also in 6 projects that use this
assisjpSkilltakeover
Take over an existing branch, pull request, worktree, or agent handoff while preserving the original goal, contributor credit, and concurrent work. Use when the user asks to take over, finish, rescue, or continue someone else's implementation. Do not use to replace a clear request to start new work.
Also in 4 projects that use this
garrytanSkillmodernize
Bring an aging pull request onto its current base and decide whether it should still exist: MODERNIZE, REWORK or CLOSE, with range-diff proof before any push. (gstack)
Also in 4 projects that use this
assisjpSkillfile-pr
Prepare and open or update an authorized pull request with a concise problem-first description and verifiable evidence. Use when the user asks to create, file, open, or update a PR. Do not use merely to review a diff or when publication is not authorized.
Also in 6 projects that use this
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- macos-appkit-interopSkill
- macos-build-run-debugSkill
- macos-liquid-glassSkill
- macos-packaging-notarizationSkill
- macos-signing-entitlementsSkill
- macos-swiftpmSkill
- macos-swiftui-patternsSkill
- macos-telemetrySkill
- macos-test-triageSkill
- macos-view-refactorSkill
- macos-window-managementSkill
- release-swiftSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

